Forum The Longship 2024 QB Watch

2024 QB Watch

MaroonBells
Joined Jan 2014
4,281 posts
Rep: 4,469

NFL Rookie Watch@NFLRookieWatxhThe potential 2024 QB draft class absolutely showed OUT in week one.
This QB class could be the best the NFL has EVER seen.
Caleb Williams (USC): 18/24, 319 passing yards, 5 TD’s
Drake Maye (UNC): 24/32, 269 yards, 2 TD’s, 2 INT’s
Shedeur Sanders (Colorado): 38/47, 510 yards (led country), 4 TD’s
Michael Penix Jr. (UW): 29/40, 450 yards, 5 TD’s
Quinn Ewers (Texas): 19/30, 260 yards, 3 TD’s
JJ McCarthy (Michigan): 26/30, 280 yards, 3 TD’s
Bo Nix (Oregon): 23/27, 287 yards, 3 TD’s
Riley Leonard (Duke): 17/33, 175 yards, 98 rushing yards, 1 TD
Spencer Rattler (SC): 30/39, 353 yards
Joe Milton (Tennessee): 21/30, 201 yards, 4 total TD’s
Jordan Travis (FSU): 23/31, 342 yards, 5 total TD’s
And only ONE of these QB’s came away with a loss 

Liked:
#1 · Sep 5, 12:13 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"StickyBun" said:
@"MaroonBells" said: Here's the same guy on Drake Maye...


I've never really warmed to Maye after doing a fan deep dive on him a few months ago. Wanted to see what all the hype was about.....and I never saw it. JMO. 


Maye definitely has issues. He can play great one minute then make a head scratching decision. He reminds me so much of Matthew Stafford and unfortunately Blake Bortles coming out. His arm is better than Bortles and similar to Stafford. Both Stafford and Bortles had issues starting out with streaks of decent play then regression. Bortles never really worked out of it while Stafford did. Maye is a question mark, but he does have the tools to thrive if he has what it takes mentally. 

I see many TD’s from Drake, but Int’s to go with it.

Liked:
#422 · Feb 4, 12:23 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"StickyBun" said:
@"MaroonBells" said: Here's the same guy on Drake Maye...


I've never really warmed to Maye after doing a fan deep dive on him a few months ago. Wanted to see what all the hype was about.....and I never saw it. JMO. 


Honestly, I think it's mostly about his prototypical NFL QB traits. He looks like Justin Herbert. But when you put him on you see a lot of flaws. True with all of them, but I expected more from a guy some think is the 1st or 2nd best QB in the best QB class in years. 


I think there is a certain allure projecting Maye into the Shannahan/McVay offense. I personally really like each of Williams/Maye/Daniels. But Maye is the one I feel best about playing in structure. Can definitely see why KOC particularly would like him. He's not perfect. Not many rookie QBs are. His supporting cast also didn't help him much. But you're getting a guy who's diverse and can beat any defense with his arm. Every blade of grass is in-play. Then add in some mobility and you have something. 

Liked:
#423 · Feb 4, 8:01 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"purplefaithful" said:
@"jargomcfargo" said: At some point you would think that fans would stop making excuses for why this team hasn't been competitive since 2009! 
@"minny65" said:
@"jargomcfargo" said: At some point you would think that fans would stop making excuses for why this team hasn't been competitive since 2009! 
Careful, you might be called out as too negative for the rah rah, all is well, crowd.  

C'mon now...Not competitive since 09??

 This is just an example of belief and conviction over fact...

11/5 in 2015
Championship game in 17? Minny Miracle?
 10/6 in 2019
13/4 and division title in 22? 

I get the SB drought, but not competitive isn't remotely accurate. 



Yes. 2009. If you think the team that was is in the championship game in 17 was truly competitive, they got smoked. Yes it was an unexpected fun season, but they weren't good enough to be  a superbowl caliber team.
Nor were they a championship caliber team in 2019 and certainly 2022. Maybe a chance in 2015, but how did that go?
When I say competitive, I mean a team that is good enough to win it all.
The Vikings used to field a team that was competitive to win it all about every 10 years. I haven't seen one since 2009.

Liked:
#424 · Feb 4, 10:25 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

Maye shuffles his feet in the pocket and drifts towards the side he intends to throw to.  Needs to learn to set and go through progressions.  His play is uneven.  Sometimes makes reads, sometimes locks on a guy.  Makes a great throw then one that misses badly.  His footwork is all over the place. 

Plays behind a weak line and with bad receivers, so he will arrive in the NFL with the ability to move and throw under pressure.  Hard to find examples of him throwing from a clean pocket with open targets.  Throws a nice deep ball.  Has the size and tools and good straight line speed.  Can slide when he remembers to but usually crashes into defenders-another inconsistent trait.  Throws into tight coverage and makes the occasional wtf throw that gets picked.  

He'll get drafted high and need a lot of work to clean up the issues.  Could develop into a solid top 10-15 type guy like Kirk.  I don't see him as that franchise game changer that every team is hoping to find but some team will try to sell that to it's fanbase regardless.  Reminds me of Matt Stafford with that ability to look great on one play then kill the drive on the next one.  A football roller coaster ride, if you enjoy that sort of thing.

Liked:
#425 · Feb 5, 6:14 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"Geoff Nichols" said:
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"StickyBun" said:
@"MaroonBells" said: Here's the same guy on Drake Maye...


I've never really warmed to Maye after doing a fan deep dive on him a few months ago. Wanted to see what all the hype was about.....and I never saw it. JMO. 


Honestly, I think it's mostly about his prototypical NFL QB traits. He looks like Justin Herbert. But when you put him on you see a lot of flaws. True with all of them, but I expected more from a guy some think is the 1st or 2nd best QB in the best QB class in years. 


I think there is a certain allure projecting Maye into the Shannahan/McVay offense. I personally really like each of Williams/Maye/Daniels. But Maye is the one I feel best about playing in structure. Can definitely see why KOC particularly would like him. He's not perfect. Not many rookie QBs are. His supporting cast also didn't help him much. But you're getting a guy who's diverse and can beat any defense with his arm. Every blade of grass is in-play. Then add in some mobility and you have something. 


Definitely agree with the bold. I think he has the highest floor among all the QBs, landing somewhere between Daniel Jones and Justin Herbert. Just not sure he has greatness written on him.  

Liked:
#426 · Feb 5, 6:44 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"Geoff Nichols" said:
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"StickyBun" said:
@"MaroonBells" said: Here's the same guy on Drake Maye...


I've never really warmed to Maye after doing a fan deep dive on him a few months ago. Wanted to see what all the hype was about.....and I never saw it. JMO. 


Honestly, I think it's mostly about his prototypical NFL QB traits. He looks like Justin Herbert. But when you put him on you see a lot of flaws. True with all of them, but I expected more from a guy some think is the 1st or 2nd best QB in the best QB class in years. 


I think there is a certain allure projecting Maye into the Shannahan/McVay offense. I personally really like each of Williams/Maye/Daniels. But Maye is the one I feel best about playing in structure. Can definitely see why KOC particularly would like him. He's not perfect. Not many rookie QBs are. His supporting cast also didn't help him much. But you're getting a guy who's diverse and can beat any defense with his arm. Every blade of grass is in-play. Then add in some mobility and you have something. 


I think any of those top 3 ending up in Minnesota is a pipe dream. So the question becomes, how would you rank that second tier (Nix, Penix, McCarthy) group as far as fit for the Vikings?

Liked:
#427 · Feb 5, 6:55 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
Liked:
#428 · Feb 5, 7:36 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"MaroonBells" said: https://twitter.com/dpbrugler/status/1754501215788900653?s=20
Feel like most will be surprised to see JJ McCarthy so high on the list. People bag on him for not really carrying Michigan, but if you watch his tape in detail he really made a lot of throws when they needed it most, which plays into that 3rd down %. Pulls out the storyline that Michigan may just have not needed to throw it much to win. Still don't think we saw what McCarthy can or can't be in that offense. Tough projection. 
Liked:
#429 · Feb 5, 7:53 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"Geoff Nichols" said:
@"MaroonBells" said: https://twitter.com/dpbrugler/status/1754501215788900653?s=20
Feel like most will be surprised to see JJ McCarthy so high on the list. People bag on him for not really carrying Michigan, but if you watch his tape in detail he really made a lot of throws when they needed it most, which plays into that 3rd down %. Pulls out the storyline that Michigan may just have not needed to throw it much to win. Still don't think we saw what McCarthy can or can't be in that offense. Tough projection. 
One thing McCarthy has developed that will help his pro career is play-action. He's excellent at hiding it, much like Cousins. I think he's got a bunch of upside, he's a young guy who just turned 21 years old and would benefit greatly by being drafted by Minnesota and sitting behind Cousins.
Liked:
#430 · Feb 5, 8:29 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"StickyBun" said:
@"Geoff Nichols" said:
@"MaroonBells" said: https://twitter.com/dpbrugler/status/1754501215788900653?s=20
Feel like most will be surprised to see JJ McCarthy so high on the list. People bag on him for not really carrying Michigan, but if you watch his tape in detail he really made a lot of throws when they needed it most, which plays into that 3rd down %. Pulls out the storyline that Michigan may just have not needed to throw it much to win. Still don't think we saw what McCarthy can or can't be in that offense. Tough projection. 
One thing McCarthy has developed that will help his pro career is play-action. He's excellent at hiding it, much like Cousins. I think he's got a bunch of upside, he's a young guy who just turned 21 years old and would benefit greatly by being drafted by Minnesota and sitting behind Cousins.
I haven't seen this comp much, but McCarthy reminds me a lot of Brock Purdy with a better arm. That's good enough in the right environment. But I do think it leads you to believe there will be some limitations. But you nailed the fact that McCarthy needs to probably sit at least a year. I just don't think that will be Kirk if its the route they go. Kirk and his camp are very aware the Vikings may draft a developmental QB and won't sign a deal that makes that a favorable outcome for MN. E.G they'll ask for guarantees through year 2 and partial guarantees into the 3rd year of a contract with no trade clause. I wouldn't read that as Kirk not wanting to be a team player. Its rather he wants it to be his team without the media pressure and fan favoritism towards a backup QB. 
Liked:
#431 · Feb 5, 9:21 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"Geoff Nichols" said:
@"StickyBun" said:
@"Geoff Nichols" said:
@"MaroonBells" said: https://twitter.com/dpbrugler/status/1754501215788900653?s=20
Feel like most will be surprised to see JJ McCarthy so high on the list. People bag on him for not really carrying Michigan, but if you watch his tape in detail he really made a lot of throws when they needed it most, which plays into that 3rd down %. Pulls out the storyline that Michigan may just have not needed to throw it much to win. Still don't think we saw what McCarthy can or can't be in that offense. Tough projection. 
One thing McCarthy has developed that will help his pro career is play-action. He's excellent at hiding it, much like Cousins. I think he's got a bunch of upside, he's a young guy who just turned 21 years old and would benefit greatly by being drafted by Minnesota and sitting behind Cousins.
I haven't seen this comp much, but McCarthy reminds me a lot of Brock Purdy with a better arm. That's good enough in the right environment. But I do think it leads you to believe there will be some limitations. But you nailed the fact that McCarthy needs to probably sit at least a year. I just don't think that will be Kirk if its the route they go. Kirk and his camp are very aware the Vikings may draft a developmental QB and won't sign a deal that makes that a favorable outcome for MN. E.G they'll ask for guarantees through year 2 and partial guarantees into the 3rd year of a contract with no trade clause. I wouldn't read that as Kirk not wanting to be a team player. Its rather he wants it to be his team without the media pressure and fan favoritism towards a backup QB. 
over and above existing money against the cap,  how much new money  do you see him wanting from Minny at the terms you laid out?
Liked:
#432 · Feb 5, 9:54 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"Geoff Nichols" said:
@"MaroonBells" said: https://twitter.com/dpbrugler/status/1754501215788900653?s=20
Feel like most will be surprised to see JJ McCarthy so high on the list. People bag on him for not really carrying Michigan, but if you watch his tape in detail he really made a lot of throws when they needed it most, which plays into that 3rd down %. Pulls out the storyline that Michigan may just have not needed to throw it much to win. Still don't think we saw what McCarthy can or can't be in that offense. Tough projection. 
I’m in the camp (the island?) that if Mccarthy is there at 11, run to the podium. The idea we could draft Verse or Murphy at 11 and somehow jump back into the first (with what?) to get Mccarthy seems like a pipe dream. I just don’t think he’ll be there late enough that it won’t cost us next year’s first to get him. And at that point is it worth it to not just take him at 11. Hell depending how the combine and process unfolds we might have to trade UP for him. I’d be good with that too. 

As to your note on Kirk— I’ve been saying it and getting ignored for months. There’s a lot of reasons and frankly evidence to indicate Kirk isn’t going to sign a contract to be a (handsomely paid) bridge QB. If another team will guarantee him 2+ years, why would he?

Liked:
#433 · Feb 5, 9:58 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"Geoff Nichols" said:
@"StickyBun" said:
@"Geoff Nichols" said:
@"MaroonBells" said: https://twitter.com/dpbrugler/status/1754501215788900653?s=20
Feel like most will be surprised to see JJ McCarthy so high on the list. People bag on him for not really carrying Michigan, but if you watch his tape in detail he really made a lot of throws when they needed it most, which plays into that 3rd down %. Pulls out the storyline that Michigan may just have not needed to throw it much to win. Still don't think we saw what McCarthy can or can't be in that offense. Tough projection. 
One thing McCarthy has developed that will help his pro career is play-action. He's excellent at hiding it, much like Cousins. I think he's got a bunch of upside, he's a young guy who just turned 21 years old and would benefit greatly by being drafted by Minnesota and sitting behind Cousins.
I haven't seen this comp much, but McCarthy reminds me a lot of Brock Purdy with a better arm. That's good enough in the right environment. But I do think it leads you to believe there will be some limitations. But you nailed the fact that McCarthy needs to probably sit at least a year. I just don't think that will be Kirk if its the route they go. Kirk and his camp are very aware the Vikings may draft a developmental QB and won't sign a deal that makes that a favorable outcome for MN. E.G they'll ask for guarantees through year 2 and partial guarantees into the 3rd year of a contract with no trade clause. I wouldn't read that as Kirk not wanting to be a team player. Its rather he wants it to be his team without the media pressure and fan favoritism towards a backup QB. 
What's the upside to drafting a QB then having him sit through most of the years you have cost control?

 Do KAM/KOC want to hitch their carees to aging Kirk off an achilles injury?

 Is the fan base going to stay interested in a team that wins 7-10 games every year and never does squat in the playoffs? The home field advantage seems to have evaporated and a friend who goes to every game says it feels dead in there a lot of the time.

As always I wonder what the direction is and can't see one that leads anywhere beyond revenue as the primary concern. Ymmv.

Liked:
#434 · Feb 5, 10:16 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"comet52" said:
@"Geoff Nichols" said:
@"StickyBun" said:
@"Geoff Nichols" said:
@"MaroonBells" said: https://twitter.com/dpbrugler/status/1754501215788900653?s=20
Feel like most will be surprised to see JJ McCarthy so high on the list. People bag on him for not really carrying Michigan, but if you watch his tape in detail he really made a lot of throws when they needed it most, which plays into that 3rd down %. Pulls out the storyline that Michigan may just have not needed to throw it much to win. Still don't think we saw what McCarthy can or can't be in that offense. Tough projection. 
One thing McCarthy has developed that will help his pro career is play-action. He's excellent at hiding it, much like Cousins. I think he's got a bunch of upside, he's a young guy who just turned 21 years old and would benefit greatly by being drafted by Minnesota and sitting behind Cousins.
I haven't seen this comp much, but McCarthy reminds me a lot of Brock Purdy with a better arm. That's good enough in the right environment. But I do think it leads you to believe there will be some limitations. But you nailed the fact that McCarthy needs to probably sit at least a year. I just don't think that will be Kirk if its the route they go. Kirk and his camp are very aware the Vikings may draft a developmental QB and won't sign a deal that makes that a favorable outcome for MN. E.G they'll ask for guarantees through year 2 and partial guarantees into the 3rd year of a contract with no trade clause. I wouldn't read that as Kirk not wanting to be a team player. Its rather he wants it to be his team without the media pressure and fan favoritism towards a backup QB. 
What's the upside to drafting a QB then having him sit through most of the years you have cost control?

 Do KAM/KOC want to hitch their carees to aging Kirk off an achilles injury?

 Is the fan base going to stay interested in a team that wins 7-10 games every year and never does squat in the playoffs? The home field advantage seems to have evaporated and a friend who goes to every game says it feels dead in there a lot of the time.

As always I wonder what the direction is and can't see one that leads anywhere beyond revenue as the primary concern. Ymmv.


It'll be interesting to hear Geoff...

 Some of my own thoughts:

 There is a BIG downside to pushing a rook QB out there too early
 GB imo is best in bringing a QB along
 None of the Tier 2 guys (who are the highest probability of being a Viking) are viewed as year 1 starters 
 Vikings with Kirk were 13/3 with a 28 ranked D just a season removed, 23 was an injury shit show

 All that said, I am not sure the Vikings and Kirk are going to reach agreement on a structure, especially with how Geoff is laying-out what Cousins is looking for.  

Liked:
#435 · Feb 5, 10:57 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"Geoff Nichols" said:
@"StickyBun" said:
@"Geoff Nichols" said:
@"MaroonBells" said: https://twitter.com/dpbrugler/status/1754501215788900653?s=20
Feel like most will be surprised to see JJ McCarthy so high on the list. People bag on him for not really carrying Michigan, but if you watch his tape in detail he really made a lot of throws when they needed it most, which plays into that 3rd down %. Pulls out the storyline that Michigan may just have not needed to throw it much to win. Still don't think we saw what McCarthy can or can't be in that offense. Tough projection. 
One thing McCarthy has developed that will help his pro career is play-action. He's excellent at hiding it, much like Cousins. I think he's got a bunch of upside, he's a young guy who just turned 21 years old and would benefit greatly by being drafted by Minnesota and sitting behind Cousins.
I haven't seen this comp much, but McCarthy reminds me a lot of Brock Purdy with a better arm. That's good enough in the right environment. But I do think it leads you to believe there will be some limitations. But you nailed the fact that McCarthy needs to probably sit at least a year. I just don't think that will be Kirk if its the route they go. Kirk and his camp are very aware the Vikings may draft a developmental QB and won't sign a deal that makes that a favorable outcome for MN. E.G they'll ask for guarantees through year 2 and partial guarantees into the 3rd year of a contract with no trade clause. I wouldn't read that as Kirk not wanting to be a team player. Its rather he wants it to be his team without the media pressure and fan favoritism towards a backup QB. 
If this is the case and Kirk is trying to make it difficult (i.e. stick it to us) and force our hand...see ya!! I'd rather go 4-13 next season with Minshew at QB and a rookie sitting behind him than get bent over a barrel by Cousins and his agent again coming off an achillies tear. Like I said, let some other team take that risk and the guarantees that accompany it..
Liked:
#436 · Feb 5, 11:43 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"supafreak84" said:
@"Geoff Nichols" said:
@"StickyBun" said:
@"Geoff Nichols" said:
@"MaroonBells" said: https://twitter.com/dpbrugler/status/1754501215788900653?s=20
Feel like most will be surprised to see JJ McCarthy so high on the list. People bag on him for not really carrying Michigan, but if you watch his tape in detail he really made a lot of throws when they needed it most, which plays into that 3rd down %. Pulls out the storyline that Michigan may just have not needed to throw it much to win. Still don't think we saw what McCarthy can or can't be in that offense. Tough projection. 
One thing McCarthy has developed that will help his pro career is play-action. He's excellent at hiding it, much like Cousins. I think he's got a bunch of upside, he's a young guy who just turned 21 years old and would benefit greatly by being drafted by Minnesota and sitting behind Cousins.
I haven't seen this comp much, but McCarthy reminds me a lot of Brock Purdy with a better arm. That's good enough in the right environment. But I do think it leads you to believe there will be some limitations. But you nailed the fact that McCarthy needs to probably sit at least a year. I just don't think that will be Kirk if its the route they go. Kirk and his camp are very aware the Vikings may draft a developmental QB and won't sign a deal that makes that a favorable outcome for MN. E.G they'll ask for guarantees through year 2 and partial guarantees into the 3rd year of a contract with no trade clause. I wouldn't read that as Kirk not wanting to be a team player. Its rather he wants it to be his team without the media pressure and fan favoritism towards a backup QB. 
If this is the case and Kirk is trying to make it difficult (i.e. stick it to us) and force our hand...see ya!! I'd rather go 4-13 next season with Minshew at QB and a rookie sitting behind him than get bent over a barrel by Cousins and his agent again coming off an achillies tear. Like I said, let some other team take that risk and the guarantees that accompany it..
IMO any QB we take this year should be ready to take the reins no later than mid 25 season,  if not we likely made the wrong pick.  I like the 1 year or so of watching and learning,  but after 2 full camps if they arent ready to take their lumps,  they likely never will be,  with that said,  the coach needs to find opportunities along the way for them to get a taste of the game so the dont completely sit out of football action for 2 years.
Liked:
#437 · Feb 5, 12:33 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"purplefaithful" said:
@"comet52" said:
@"Geoff Nichols" said:
@"StickyBun" said:
@"Geoff Nichols" said:
@"MaroonBells" said: https://twitter.com/dpbrugler/status/1754501215788900653?s=20
Feel like most will be surprised to see JJ McCarthy so high on the list. People bag on him for not really carrying Michigan, but if you watch his tape in detail he really made a lot of throws when they needed it most, which plays into that 3rd down %. Pulls out the storyline that Michigan may just have not needed to throw it much to win. Still don't think we saw what McCarthy can or can't be in that offense. Tough projection. 
One thing McCarthy has developed that will help his pro career is play-action. He's excellent at hiding it, much like Cousins. I think he's got a bunch of upside, he's a young guy who just turned 21 years old and would benefit greatly by being drafted by Minnesota and sitting behind Cousins.
I haven't seen this comp much, but McCarthy reminds me a lot of Brock Purdy with a better arm. That's good enough in the right environment. But I do think it leads you to believe there will be some limitations. But you nailed the fact that McCarthy needs to probably sit at least a year. I just don't think that will be Kirk if its the route they go. Kirk and his camp are very aware the Vikings may draft a developmental QB and won't sign a deal that makes that a favorable outcome for MN. E.G they'll ask for guarantees through year 2 and partial guarantees into the 3rd year of a contract with no trade clause. I wouldn't read that as Kirk not wanting to be a team player. Its rather he wants it to be his team without the media pressure and fan favoritism towards a backup QB. 
What's the upside to drafting a QB then having him sit through most of the years you have cost control?

 Do KAM/KOC want to hitch their carees to aging Kirk off an achilles injury?

 Is the fan base going to stay interested in a team that wins 7-10 games every year and never does squat in the playoffs? The home field advantage seems to have evaporated and a friend who goes to every game says it feels dead in there a lot of the time.

As always I wonder what the direction is and can't see one that leads anywhere beyond revenue as the primary concern. Ymmv.


It'll be interesting to hear Geoff...

 Some of my own thoughts:

 There is a BIG downside to pushing a rook QB out there too early
 GB imo is best in bringing a QB along
 None of the Tier 2 guys (who are the highest probability of being a Viking) are viewed as year 1 starters 
 Vikings with Kirk were 13/3 with a 28 ranked D just a season removed, 23 was an injury shit show

 All that said, I am not sure the Vikings and Kirk are going to reach agreement on a structure, especially with how Geoff is laying-out what Cousins is looking for.  



I don't think anyone knows what Cousins will be looking for. They don't even start talking for another few weeks.  

Liked:
#438 · Feb 5, 12:33 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"purplefaithful" said:
@"comet52" said:
@"Geoff Nichols" said:
@"StickyBun" said:
@"Geoff Nichols" said:
@"MaroonBells" said: https://twitter.com/dpbrugler/status/1754501215788900653?s=20
Feel like most will be surprised to see JJ McCarthy so high on the list. People bag on him for not really carrying Michigan, but if you watch his tape in detail he really made a lot of throws when they needed it most, which plays into that 3rd down %. Pulls out the storyline that Michigan may just have not needed to throw it much to win. Still don't think we saw what McCarthy can or can't be in that offense. Tough projection. 
One thing McCarthy has developed that will help his pro career is play-action. He's excellent at hiding it, much like Cousins. I think he's got a bunch of upside, he's a young guy who just turned 21 years old and would benefit greatly by being drafted by Minnesota and sitting behind Cousins.
I haven't seen this comp much, but McCarthy reminds me a lot of Brock Purdy with a better arm. That's good enough in the right environment. But I do think it leads you to believe there will be some limitations. But you nailed the fact that McCarthy needs to probably sit at least a year. I just don't think that will be Kirk if its the route they go. Kirk and his camp are very aware the Vikings may draft a developmental QB and won't sign a deal that makes that a favorable outcome for MN. E.G they'll ask for guarantees through year 2 and partial guarantees into the 3rd year of a contract with no trade clause. I wouldn't read that as Kirk not wanting to be a team player. Its rather he wants it to be his team without the media pressure and fan favoritism towards a backup QB. 
What's the upside to drafting a QB then having him sit through most of the years you have cost control?

 Do KAM/KOC want to hitch their carees to aging Kirk off an achilles injury?

 Is the fan base going to stay interested in a team that wins 7-10 games every year and never does squat in the playoffs? The home field advantage seems to have evaporated and a friend who goes to every game says it feels dead in there a lot of the time.

As always I wonder what the direction is and can't see one that leads anywhere beyond revenue as the primary concern. Ymmv.


It'll be interesting to hear Geoff...

 Some of my own thoughts:

 There is a BIG downside to pushing a rook QB out there too early
 GB imo is best in bringing a QB along
 None of the Tier 2 guys (who are the highest probability of being a Viking) are viewed as year 1 starters 
 Vikings with Kirk were 13/3 with a 28 ranked D just a season removed, 23 was an injury shit show

 All that said, I am not sure the Vikings and Kirk are going to reach agreement on a structure, especially with how Geoff is laying-out what Cousins is looking for.  



A lot will come down to who is interested and how his market shapes up. If in the end its hot and some ready to win teams like the Falcons, Steelers, etc. want to go for it over the next 2-3 years I don't really see how they are going to find a contract structure that works for MN. Comet said it well, Kirk doesn't want to be a bridge QB, he is looking to compete and win. So the Vikings can't really have it both ways. In other terms its where you are either competitive or rebuilding and aren't undergoing a competitive rebuild. 

Leaves MN in a real funny spot either needing to keep the pedal down on competing now or trading up for a high-end rookie QB who can play immediately. 

Liked:
#439 · Feb 5, 12:37 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"Geoff Nichols" said:
@"purplefaithful" said:
@"comet52" said:
@"Geoff Nichols" said:
@"StickyBun" said:
@"Geoff Nichols" said:
@"MaroonBells" said: https://twitter.com/dpbrugler/status/1754501215788900653?s=20
Feel like most will be surprised to see JJ McCarthy so high on the list. People bag on him for not really carrying Michigan, but if you watch his tape in detail he really made a lot of throws when they needed it most, which plays into that 3rd down %. Pulls out the storyline that Michigan may just have not needed to throw it much to win. Still don't think we saw what McCarthy can or can't be in that offense. Tough projection. 
One thing McCarthy has developed that will help his pro career is play-action. He's excellent at hiding it, much like Cousins. I think he's got a bunch of upside, he's a young guy who just turned 21 years old and would benefit greatly by being drafted by Minnesota and sitting behind Cousins.
I haven't seen this comp much, but McCarthy reminds me a lot of Brock Purdy with a better arm. That's good enough in the right environment. But I do think it leads you to believe there will be some limitations. But you nailed the fact that McCarthy needs to probably sit at least a year. I just don't think that will be Kirk if its the route they go. Kirk and his camp are very aware the Vikings may draft a developmental QB and won't sign a deal that makes that a favorable outcome for MN. E.G they'll ask for guarantees through year 2 and partial guarantees into the 3rd year of a contract with no trade clause. I wouldn't read that as Kirk not wanting to be a team player. Its rather he wants it to be his team without the media pressure and fan favoritism towards a backup QB. 
What's the upside to drafting a QB then having him sit through most of the years you have cost control?

 Do KAM/KOC want to hitch their carees to aging Kirk off an achilles injury?

 Is the fan base going to stay interested in a team that wins 7-10 games every year and never does squat in the playoffs? The home field advantage seems to have evaporated and a friend who goes to every game says it feels dead in there a lot of the time.

As always I wonder what the direction is and can't see one that leads anywhere beyond revenue as the primary concern. Ymmv.


It'll be interesting to hear Geoff...

 Some of my own thoughts:

 There is a BIG downside to pushing a rook QB out there too early
 GB imo is best in bringing a QB along
 None of the Tier 2 guys (who are the highest probability of being a Viking) are viewed as year 1 starters 
 Vikings with Kirk were 13/3 with a 28 ranked D just a season removed, 23 was an injury shit show

 All that said, I am not sure the Vikings and Kirk are going to reach agreement on a structure, especially with how Geoff is laying-out what Cousins is looking for.  



A lot will come down to who is interested and how his market shapes up. If in the end its hot and some ready to win teams like the Falcons, Steelers, etc. want to go for it over the next 2-3 years I don't really see how they are going to find a contract structure that works for MN. Comet said it well, Kirk doesn't want to be a bridge QB, he is looking to compete and win. So the Vikings can't really have it both ways. In other terms its where you are either competitive or rebuilding and aren't undergoing a competitive rebuild. 

Leaves MN in a real funny spot either needing to keep the pedal down on competing now or trading up for a high-end rookie QB who can play immediately. 



What about the Minshew bridge qb strategy to fire-up the fans @ USB stadium this fall? 

When you say high-end rookie, I assume you mean Caleb, Daniels or Maye? And are any or all of them ready to really start in September? 

Liked:
#440 · Feb 5, 12:58 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

Well that tears it, Kirk is against the competitive rebuild, blasphemy I say…!  ;) B)  

Liked:
#441 · Feb 5, 1:06 PM
Log in to reply.

Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)

Warn Poster

Suspend User (3 days)

The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.

Forum The Longship 2024 QB Watch

Welcome to VikeFans!

Welcome back, Skol fans! This is our new home. Log in with your username or email and your existing password.


Be sure to check out the How To's and Questions forum for guides on getting around the new site, and use the Help Request forum if you run into anything that you need help with. Skol!