Forum The Longship Vikings are waiving Reagor

Vikings are waiving Reagor

StickierBuns
Joined May 2013
5,336 posts
Rep: 1
#1 · Aug 30, 7:45 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
The problem I had with Bradford was wondering if he'd be good.  He could look awesome, but then just take a stupid sack, make a really costly Int or fumble.  He just never was a top tier QB.  I "wanted" to like that trade, but Bradford was just never all that good and I was skeptical.  That 70% completion rate in 2016 was a bit misleading by the 7 yard completion average (among then lowest in the NFL).I do think Rick did swing for the fences with that trade looking for a short term QB solution, but it turned out to be a swing and a huge miss.Funny how it's Ok if Rick swings and misses, but if Kwesi does it, he's just a complete clueless inexperienced idiot.Why is that?
#62 · Aug 31, 5:27 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"supafreak84" said:
@"mblack" said:
@"supafreak84" said:
@"mblack" said: John Carlson, Mike Wallace, Sam Bradford, Daniel Carlson, Kaare V, Josh Freeman etc. All GMs made good and bad descisions. 
I think we can throw Sam Bradford out of that mix. When you are a conference favorite and lose your starting quarterback to a catastrophic leg injury 10 days before the regular season starts...you do what you have to do, and Bradford was a good player for us until his knee gave out. There were no better options and holding that move as a negative against Spieman is ridiculous 
Nope you cant make excuses why a pick was made or draft was made. 1. Rick was GM when Daniel Carlson was cut 2. Rick gave up too much for Bradford who ended up being wait for it …. injured and nit justifying all the picks. 

This is what was said at the time

The Vikings gave up a first-round pick in 2017 and a fourth-round pick in 2018 that can become a third- or second-rounder based on conditions -- a massive price to pay for what could amount to one season of work.

Again i am not blaming Rick. i am just saying all GMs have good and bad moves.



It's not an excuse, but what was the alternative? What would you have preferred him to do in that situation? 


Draft a backup rather than rely on Shaun Hill?  Rick really could have tried drafting more than one QB.  He ended up signing the poster boy of drafting a backup QB in Cousins.

#63 · Aug 31, 5:37 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"greediron" said:
@"supafreak84" said:
@"mblack" said:
@"supafreak84" said:
@"mblack" said: John Carlson, Mike Wallace, Sam Bradford, Daniel Carlson, Kaare V, Josh Freeman etc. All GMs made good and bad descisions. 
I think we can throw Sam Bradford out of that mix. When you are a conference favorite and lose your starting quarterback to a catastrophic leg injury 10 days before the regular season starts...you do what you have to do, and Bradford was a good player for us until his knee gave out. There were no better options and holding that move as a negative against Spieman is ridiculous 
Nope you cant make excuses why a pick was made or draft was made. 1. Rick was GM when Daniel Carlson was cut 2. Rick gave up too much for Bradford who ended up being wait for it …. injured and nit justifying all the picks. 

This is what was said at the time

The Vikings gave up a first-round pick in 2017 and a fourth-round pick in 2018 that can become a third- or second-rounder based on conditions -- a massive price to pay for what could amount to one season of work.

Again i am not blaming Rick. i am just saying all GMs have good and bad moves.



It's not an excuse, but what was the alternative? What would you have preferred him to do in that situation? 


Draft a backup rather than rely on Shaun Hill?  Rick really could have tried drafting more than one QB.  He ended up signing the poster boy of drafting a backup QB in Cousins.


One of my biggest gripes with Rick was he never took enough shots at QB in the draft. However the two backups that year were Hill and Taylor Heinike, who has shown to be a capable backup QB. The league is littered with Shaun Hill's and Heinike's and very few can sustain their starter being out for an extended period of time. I just don't think you can dump on Rick under the circumstances for the Bradford trade 

#64 · Aug 31, 7:15 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"supafreak84" said:
@"greediron" said:
@"supafreak84" said:
@"mblack" said:
@"supafreak84" said:
@"mblack" said: John Carlson, Mike Wallace, Sam Bradford, Daniel Carlson, Kaare V, Josh Freeman etc. All GMs made good and bad descisions. 
I think we can throw Sam Bradford out of that mix. When you are a conference favorite and lose your starting quarterback to a catastrophic leg injury 10 days before the regular season starts...you do what you have to do, and Bradford was a good player for us until his knee gave out. There were no better options and holding that move as a negative against Spieman is ridiculous 
Nope you cant make excuses why a pick was made or draft was made. 1. Rick was GM when Daniel Carlson was cut 2. Rick gave up too much for Bradford who ended up being wait for it …. injured and nit justifying all the picks. 

This is what was said at the time

The Vikings gave up a first-round pick in 2017 and a fourth-round pick in 2018 that can become a third- or second-rounder based on conditions -- a massive price to pay for what could amount to one season of work.

Again i am not blaming Rick. i am just saying all GMs have good and bad moves.



It's not an excuse, but what was the alternative? What would you have preferred him to do in that situation? 


Draft a backup rather than rely on Shaun Hill?  Rick really could have tried drafting more than one QB.  He ended up signing the poster boy of drafting a backup QB in Cousins.


One of my biggest gripes with Rick was he never took enough shots at QB in the draft. However the two backups that year were Hill and Taylor Heinike, who has shown to be a capable backup QB. The league is littered with Shaun Hill's and Heinike's and very few can sustain their starter being out for an extended period of time. I just don't think you can dump on Rick under the circumstances for the Bradford trade 


I agree, I think at the time most fans were happy with the Bradford deal. Spielman didn't really have many options and with the team they had they needed a starting caliber QB.

#65 · Aug 31, 7:50 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

Another thing about Bradford is he was considered during that time one of the most accurate quarterbacks with a strong arm.  No mobility at all, but he could really sling the football.

#66 · Aug 31, 8:34 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"1VikesFan" said:
@"supafreak84" said:
@"greediron" said:
@"supafreak84" said:
@"mblack" said:
@"supafreak84" said:
@"mblack" said: John Carlson, Mike Wallace, Sam Bradford, Daniel Carlson, Kaare V, Josh Freeman etc. All GMs made good and bad descisions. 
I think we can throw Sam Bradford out of that mix. When you are a conference favorite and lose your starting quarterback to a catastrophic leg injury 10 days before the regular season starts...you do what you have to do, and Bradford was a good player for us until his knee gave out. There were no better options and holding that move as a negative against Spieman is ridiculous 
Nope you cant make excuses why a pick was made or draft was made. 1. Rick was GM when Daniel Carlson was cut 2. Rick gave up too much for Bradford who ended up being wait for it …. injured and nit justifying all the picks. 

This is what was said at the time

The Vikings gave up a first-round pick in 2017 and a fourth-round pick in 2018 that can become a third- or second-rounder based on conditions -- a massive price to pay for what could amount to one season of work.

Again i am not blaming Rick. i am just saying all GMs have good and bad moves.



It's not an excuse, but what was the alternative? What would you have preferred him to do in that situation? 


Draft a backup rather than rely on Shaun Hill?  Rick really could have tried drafting more than one QB.  He ended up signing the poster boy of drafting a backup QB in Cousins.


One of my biggest gripes with Rick was he never took enough shots at QB in the draft. However the two backups that year were Hill and Taylor Heinike, who has shown to be a capable backup QB. The league is littered with Shaun Hill's and Heinike's and very few can sustain their starter being out for an extended period of time. I just don't think you can dump on Rick under the circumstances for the Bradford trade 


I agree, I think at the time most fans were happy with the Bradford deal. Spielman didn't really have many options and with the team they had they needed a starting caliber QB.


I think the main reason most fans were somewhat ok with that deal was we felt the team was going to be special. The comp was very one-sided. Bradford came out in Game 1 and put on a show, that also helped big time. And then.....

#67 · Sep 1, 3:21 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"comet52" said: I'd have tanked it and drafted Mahomes the next spring.  When Ted went down with such a brutal injury my first thought was tank the season and draft his successor.

Now before anyone cries it would be impossible to pull that off, I have been told over and over around here what a great g.m. Rick was.  Surely a great g.m. could have accomplished that, instead of giving up the farm for journeyman Sam Bradford and his bum knees, right?  

Unfortunately, short-term short-sighted thinking helmed the Longship for many years, leading to so many missed opportunities on the personnel front.  Maybe KAM is finally going to change that, we'll see.


Is that what you stated at the time or is that 20/20?

For instance, do you want us to tank this season for what should be a great QB class?

#68 · Sep 1, 11:38 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"minny65" said:
@"comet52" said: I'd have tanked it and drafted Mahomes the next spring.  When Ted went down with such a brutal injury my first thought was tank the season and draft his successor.

Now before anyone cries it would be impossible to pull that off, I have been told over and over around here what a great g.m. Rick was.  Surely a great g.m. could have accomplished that, instead of giving up the farm for journeyman Sam Bradford and his bum knees, right?  

Unfortunately, short-term short-sighted thinking helmed the Longship for many years, leading to so many missed opportunities on the personnel front.  Maybe KAM is finally going to change that, we'll see.


Is that what you stated at the time or is that 20/20?

For instance, do you want us to tank this season for what should be a great QB class?



I don't think the Wilfs would ever allow a tank (even if it would be in the best interest of the franchise) henceforth the "competitive rebuild." Caleb Williams or Drake Maye would look pretty damn good in purple, but no chance of that happening. Wash, rinse, repeat...

#69 · Sep 1, 11:55 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"minny65" said:
@"comet52" said: I'd have tanked it and drafted Mahomes the next spring.  When Ted went down with such a brutal injury my first thought was tank the season and draft his successor.

Now before anyone cries it would be impossible to pull that off, I have been told over and over around here what a great g.m. Rick was.  Surely a great g.m. could have accomplished that, instead of giving up the farm for journeyman Sam Bradford and his bum knees, right?  

Unfortunately, short-term short-sighted thinking helmed the Longship for many years, leading to so many missed opportunities on the personnel front.  Maybe KAM is finally going to change that, we'll see.


Is that what you stated at the time or is that 20/20?

For instance, do you want us to tank this season for what should be a great QB class?



If Kirk had a dislocated knee and was done for the year and probably his career, sure.    And even without that scenario, I would have been fine if they'd taken that route.   I want a QBOTF a lot more than I want to watch another 9-8 season with a one and done playoff loss.

And yes I stated it at the time but everyone was on the same kick as Rick - OMG we can't let this championship roster miss it's chance, let's find a QB, etc.   Wasn't ever likely to work.  I do remember the glowing Strib article about how he and Howie Roseman were such good friends that their families took vacations together in the offseason.  Howie took his good friend for a ride that day.

#70 · Sep 1, 12:06 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

Just another thought on Spielman and his lack of rolling the dice on quarterbacks. I think missing out on Ponder made him gun shy for a bit (understandably), then there was so much scrutiny surrounding the Cousins signing from the amount of guaranteed money to his stigma of never being able to win the big game, that he wanted to avoid any possible QB controversy by not having a legit young draft pick waiting in the wings behind him. By signing the Sean Mannions of the world, there was never any threat of controversy or the crowd calling for a QB change when Kirk threw an INT or two. I think it was done intentionally and by design.

I would actually love to call in when Rick is one of the hosts on NFL Radio and ask him about this and a few other things. 

#71 · Sep 1, 12:19 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"supafreak84" said: Just another thought on Spielman and his lack of rolling the dice on quarterbacks. I think missing out on Ponder made him gun shy for a bit (understandably), then there was so much scrutiny surrounding the Cousins signing from the amount of guaranteed money to his stigma of never being able to win the big game, that he wanted to avoid any possible QB controversy by not having a legit young draft pick waiting in the wings behind him. By signing the Sean Mannions of the world, there was never any threat of controversy or the crowd calling for a QB change when Kirk threw an INT or two. I think it was done intentionally and by design.

I would actually love to call in when Rick is one of the hosts on NFL Radio and ask him about this and a few other things. 


What a terrible year to be in the market for a QB as a whole.  Newton went 1st, Locker went 8th and Gabbert went 10th before the Vikings selected 12th (right after my Badger JJ Watt).  Kaepernick and Dalton were still on the board.  In retrospect, Dalton was probably the best available though fairly far down on the pre-draft rankings. Bleacher Report said:
Overall Position Grade: C
A lot of mid-tier prospects, but no franchise quarterback in the bunch.

Here were the QB rankings pre-draft

1. Cam Newton, Auburn
2. Colin Kaepernick, Nevada
3. Blaine Gabbert, Missouri
4. Tyrod Taylor, Virginia Tech
5. Christian Ponder, Florida State
6. Jake Locker, Washington
7. Greg McElroy, Alabama
8. Ryan Mallett, Arkansas
9. Andy Dalton, TCU
10. Pat Devlin, Delaware
11. Ricky Stanzi, Iowa

Dalton has had a long career but with around a .500% win-loss record.  Kaep had that one year.  Locker is working at the Denny's in Spokane.

#72 · Sep 5, 11:54 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"badgervike" said:
@"supafreak84" said: Just another thought on Spielman and his lack of rolling the dice on quarterbacks. I think missing out on Ponder made him gun shy for a bit (understandably), then there was so much scrutiny surrounding the Cousins signing from the amount of guaranteed money to his stigma of never being able to win the big game, that he wanted to avoid any possible QB controversy by not having a legit young draft pick waiting in the wings behind him. By signing the Sean Mannions of the world, there was never any threat of controversy or the crowd calling for a QB change when Kirk threw an INT or two. I think it was done intentionally and by design.

I would actually love to call in when Rick is one of the hosts on NFL Radio and ask him about this and a few other things. 


What a terrible year to be in the market for a QB as a whole.  Newton went 1st, Locker went 8th and Gabbert went 10th before the Vikings selected 12th (right after my Badger JJ Watt).  Kaepernick and Dalton were still on the board.  In retrospect, Dalton was probably the best available though fairly far down on the pre-draft rankings. Bleacher Report said:
Overall Position Grade: C
A lot of mid-tier prospects, but no franchise quarterback in the bunch.

Here were the QB rankings pre-draft

1. Cam Newton, Auburn
2. Colin Kaepernick, Nevada
3. Blaine Gabbert, Missouri
4. Tyrod Taylor, Virginia Tech
5. Christian Ponder, Florida State
6. Jake Locker, Washington
7. Greg McElroy, Alabama
8. Ryan Mallett, Arkansas
9. Andy Dalton, TCU
10. Pat Devlin, Delaware
11. Ricky Stanzi, Iowa

Dalton has had a long career but with around a .500% win-loss record.  Kaep had that one year.  Locker is working at the Denny's in Spokane.



It was a crap year to be taking a QB. I wanted us to take Pouncey and fix the interior of our offensive line. 12 years later and I'm still waiting for them to fix the interior of our line. 

This is hard to believe, but Christian Ponder is the same age as Kirk Cousins (35). Vastly different career paths..

#73 · Sep 5, 12:03 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"supafreak84" said:
@"badgervike" said:
@"supafreak84" said: Just another thought on Spielman and his lack of rolling the dice on quarterbacks. I think missing out on Ponder made him gun shy for a bit (understandably), then there was so much scrutiny surrounding the Cousins signing from the amount of guaranteed money to his stigma of never being able to win the big game, that he wanted to avoid any possible QB controversy by not having a legit young draft pick waiting in the wings behind him. By signing the Sean Mannions of the world, there was never any threat of controversy or the crowd calling for a QB change when Kirk threw an INT or two. I think it was done intentionally and by design.

I would actually love to call in when Rick is one of the hosts on NFL Radio and ask him about this and a few other things. 


What a terrible year to be in the market for a QB as a whole.  Newton went 1st, Locker went 8th and Gabbert went 10th before the Vikings selected 12th (right after my Badger JJ Watt).  Kaepernick and Dalton were still on the board.  In retrospect, Dalton was probably the best available though fairly far down on the pre-draft rankings. Bleacher Report said:
Overall Position Grade: C
A lot of mid-tier prospects, but no franchise quarterback in the bunch.

Here were the QB rankings pre-draft

1. Cam Newton, Auburn
2. Colin Kaepernick, Nevada
3. Blaine Gabbert, Missouri
4. Tyrod Taylor, Virginia Tech
5. Christian Ponder, Florida State
6. Jake Locker, Washington
7. Greg McElroy, Alabama
8. Ryan Mallett, Arkansas
9. Andy Dalton, TCU
10. Pat Devlin, Delaware
11. Ricky Stanzi, Iowa

Dalton has had a long career but with around a .500% win-loss record.  Kaep had that one year.  Locker is working at the Denny's in Spokane.



It was a crap year to be taking a QB. I wanted us to take Pouncey and fix the interior of our offensive line. 12 years later and I'm still waiting for them to fix the interior of our line. 

This is hard to believe, but Christian Ponder is the same age as Kirk Cousins (35). Vastly different career paths..



The QB room was pretty bare as I recall post Favre.  Pay Tarvaris and keep him or play Joe Webb.  That's why you shouldn't go into a draft with a distinct position of need.

#74 · Sep 5, 12:40 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"badgervike" said:
@"supafreak84" said: Just another thought on Spielman and his lack of rolling the dice on quarterbacks. I think missing out on Ponder made him gun shy for a bit (understandably), then there was so much scrutiny surrounding the Cousins signing from the amount of guaranteed money to his stigma of never being able to win the big game, that he wanted to avoid any possible QB controversy by not having a legit young draft pick waiting in the wings behind him. By signing the Sean Mannions of the world, there was never any threat of controversy or the crowd calling for a QB change when Kirk threw an INT or two. I think it was done intentionally and by design.

I would actually love to call in when Rick is one of the hosts on NFL Radio and ask him about this and a few other things. 


What a terrible year to be in the market for a QB as a whole.  Newton went 1st, Locker went 8th and Gabbert went 10th before the Vikings selected 12th (right after my Badger JJ Watt).  Kaepernick and Dalton were still on the board.  In retrospect, Dalton was probably the best available though fairly far down on the pre-draft rankings. Bleacher Report said:
Overall Position Grade: C
A lot of mid-tier prospects, but no franchise quarterback in the bunch.

Here were the QB rankings pre-draft

1. Cam Newton, Auburn
2. Colin Kaepernick, Nevada
3. Blaine Gabbert, Missouri
4. Tyrod Taylor, Virginia Tech
5. Christian Ponder, Florida State
6. Jake Locker, Washington
7. Greg McElroy, Alabama
8. Ryan Mallett, Arkansas
9. Andy Dalton, TCU
10. Pat Devlin, Delaware
11. Ricky Stanzi, Iowa

Dalton has had a long career but with around a .500% win-loss record.  Kaep had that one year.  Locker is working at the Denny's in Spokane.



Which one.  I might be tempted to stop by.  Didn't Tyrod have a lengthy backup career, even getting some starts in Buffalo  

Then there was Ryan Leaf 2.0, Ryan Mallett.

#75 · Sep 5, 12:43 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

Eh, that’s how it goes. 
If you need a QB right now you’re kind of at the mercy of fate.  A good GM has to have a strategy for how they
end up getting a good QB in a sea of uncertain prospects.  I don’t think there’s really evidence that
suggested that Rick really had a strategy.

Regarding Bradford, he was a known injury risk.  He took a shot.  It didn’t pay off.  In hindsight, it kind of sucks that the draft
pick we used for Bradford could have picked Mahomes with a moderate trade up.

#76 · Sep 5, 1:35 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"medaille" said: Eh, that’s how it goes.  If you need a QB right now you’re kind of at the mercy of fate.  A good GM has to have a strategy for how they end up getting a good QB in a sea of uncertain prospects.  I don’t think there’s really evidence that suggested that Rick really had a strategy.

Regarding Bradford, he was a known injury risk.  He took a shot.  It didn’t pay off.  In hindsight, it kind of sucks that the draft
pick we used for Bradford could have picked Mahomes with a moderate trade up.


On Mahomes, he was universally thought of as a second round pick leading up to the draft. So I'm not sure how many teams viewed him in the same light as KC who moved all the way up to draft him 10th overall. I know i was surprised when they made the pick. It took some balls to do that with Alex Smith coming off a Pro Bowl caliber season. But great example of a team having a plan at the position and executing it to perfection 

#77 · Sep 5, 2:13 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"supafreak84" said:
@"medaille" said: Eh, that’s how it goes.  If you need a QB right now you’re kind of at the mercy of fate.  A good GM has to have a strategy for how they end up getting a good QB in a sea of uncertain prospects.  I don’t think there’s really evidence that suggested that Rick really had a strategy.

Regarding Bradford, he was a known injury risk.  He took a shot.  It didn’t pay off.  In hindsight, it kind of sucks that the draft
pick we used for Bradford could have picked Mahomes with a moderate trade up.


On Mahomes, he was universally thought of as a second round pick leading up to the draft. So I'm not sure how many teams viewed him in the same light as KC who moved all the way up to draft him 10th overall. I know i was surprised when they made the pick. It took some balls to do that with Alex Smith coming off a Pro Bowl caliber season. But great example of a team having a plan at the position and executing it to perfection 


I think the thing I like most about their strategy is that
they weren’t needy and they had the stuff in place to help him succeed.  They had a good QB.  They had a good system.  They could afford to wait a year or two for
the right prospect to fall within range of them trading up for a reasonable
price that wouldn’t cripple them and if it didn’t work out they were probably
still going to the playoffs.  Then when
they saw a guy that would work, they jumped on it.  There’s a large enough sample of guys that are
SB caliber that are found within reach of teams that aren’t bottom dwellers.  You just have to be ready to get your guy
when they are available.

#78 · Sep 5, 3:25 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"medaille" said:
@"supafreak84" said:
@"medaille" said: Eh, that’s how it goes.  If you need a QB right now you’re kind of at the mercy of fate.  A good GM has to have a strategy for how they end up getting a good QB in a sea of uncertain prospects.  I don’t think there’s really evidence that suggested that Rick really had a strategy.

Regarding Bradford, he was a known injury risk.  He took a shot.  It didn’t pay off.  In hindsight, it kind of sucks that the draft
pick we used for Bradford could have picked Mahomes with a moderate trade up.


On Mahomes, he was universally thought of as a second round pick leading up to the draft. So I'm not sure how many teams viewed him in the same light as KC who moved all the way up to draft him 10th overall. I know i was surprised when they made the pick. It took some balls to do that with Alex Smith coming off a Pro Bowl caliber season. But great example of a team having a plan at the position and executing it to perfection 


I think the thing I like most about their strategy is that
they weren’t needy and they had the stuff in place to help him succeed.  They had a good QB.  They had a good system.  They could afford to wait a year or two for
the right prospect to fall within range of them trading up for a reasonable
price that wouldn’t cripple them and if it didn’t work out they were probably
still going to the playoffs.  Then when
they saw a guy that would work, they jumped on it.  There’s a large enough sample of guys that are
SB caliber that are found within reach of teams that aren’t bottom dwellers.  You just have to be ready to get your guy
when they are available.



Sometimes the plan works and sometimes it doesn't.  Ask the 49ers about trading up for your QB of the future when you have a QB in his prime....  The reality is KC was either very good or very lucky in scouting...probably a combination of both.  There's a lot more examples of swings and misses at QB than there are successes.

#79 · Sep 5, 3:52 PM
Log in to reply.

Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)

Warn Poster

Suspend User (3 days)

The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.

Forum The Longship Vikings are waiving Reagor

Welcome to VikeFans!

Welcome back, Skol fans! This is our new home. Log in with your username or email and your existing password.


Be sure to check out the How To's and Questions forum for guides on getting around the new site, and use the Help Request forum if you run into anything that you need help with. Skol!