Forum The Longship Bridgewater returning?

Bridgewater returning?

KY
Joined Jul 2017
12 posts
Rep: 0

Twitter rumors from several pretty solid twitter sources are strongly hinting that Teddy has been or is within days of being cleared to practice.  The rumors seem to be that he will come off the PUP sometime this week.  If this is true, things are about to get crazy.

Liked:
#1 · Aug 21, 1:45 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"JimmyinSD" said:
@"Jor-El" said:
@"StickyBun" said: Heinicke's lack of arm strength is alarming and it limits him big time. I don't see the love for the guy. All this gushing over a guy that was playing against absolute scrubs on that last drive.
No kidding...isn't there a current thread about former Vikings that were envisioned as rising stars here but have been waived early by other teams (Charles Johnson, Audie Cole)...? 

For the strong Heinicke supporters: isn't even the most optimistic ceiling for his potential that he might turn into a decent backup QB, someone who could play a game or two if needed, like Shaun Hill or Case Keenum?? Or is there actually some belief that a couple years from now, Taylor Heinicke could be a starting NFL QB with the ability to lead a team to the playoffs and beyond?



affordable back up with upside.  i dont want a watered down pocket passer as a back up,  i want a guy that may not have the prototypical physical traits of a starter,  but has something to their game that will allow them to be competitive and maybe have a bit of an edge as a relative unknown coming into relief situations or a spot start.

we need a young developing guy to cheaply back up who ever wins out the starting battle.  both keenum and heineke are FA after this year,  but I think Heineke has a better game as a back up and will likely come at a lower price tag which will be key for a team thinking about franchise tagging 1 QB, and paying the other over 2 million,  it wouldnt make sense to pay another backup 2 million per year or more.



I think that's a realistic hope - that Heinicke could become a competent backup. IMO either Bridgewater or Bradford will be gone a year from now, so we will need someone as a backup to whoever remains. 

Backup QBs like Keenum are relatively valuable, but only after they have proven they can handle coming in as a substitute for a few games - REAL GAMES. Heinicke has taken zero snaps in the NFL, so he is not going to be snatched away by other teams if we waive him to our PS.

Liked:
#82 · Aug 30, 8:31 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

Someone posted here yesterday that Heinicke isn't eligible for the practice squad. So is he or isn't he?

Liked:
#83 · Aug 30, 8:41 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"prairieghost" said: Someone posted here yesterday that Heinicke isn't eligible for the practice squad. So is he or isn't he?
I wouldnt know why he wouldnt be,  he wasnt available last year and this is only his 3rd year.  IIRC they have to be active for the equivalent of 2 seasons (32 games) before they arent eligible for the PS. 
Liked:
#84 · Aug 30, 8:56 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"KyVikesFan11" said: Im not sure where the sources were getting their information, but whatever they thought they had didn't pan out.  Have a hard time thinking Teddy would be cleared to return to practice over a week ago, and still hasn't returned.  Maybe there is more going on behind the scenes that we know, with his contract and all or maybe the speculation was purely false info?  Either way, its starting to look like Teddy will head to the PUP to start the season.  Best case scenario for the team anyway, IMO.  Keep him under contract thru next season. 
IMO this kind of "leak" that Bridgewater is about to return is probably coming from him or his agent or others in his camp. The intent is to create the impression that "he's almost ready", so that, when he argues that he is healthy enough to come off PUP before week 7, everyone thinks, "Yeah I thought he was ready to go a few weeks ago..."
Liked:
#85 · Aug 30, 9:17 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"Jor-El" said:
@"JimmyinSD" said:
@"Jor-El" said:
@"StickyBun" said: Heinicke's lack of arm strength is alarming and it limits him big time. I don't see the love for the guy. All this gushing over a guy that was playing against absolute scrubs on that last drive.
No kidding...isn't there a current thread about former Vikings that were envisioned as rising stars here but have been waived early by other teams (Charles Johnson, Audie Cole)...? 

For the strong Heinicke supporters: isn't even the most optimistic ceiling for his potential that he might turn into a decent backup QB, someone who could play a game or two if needed, like Shaun Hill or Case Keenum?? Or is there actually some belief that a couple years from now, Taylor Heinicke could be a starting NFL QB with the ability to lead a team to the playoffs and beyond?



affordable back up with upside.  i dont want a watered down pocket passer as a back up,  i want a guy that may not have the prototypical physical traits of a starter,  but has something to their game that will allow them to be competitive and maybe have a bit of an edge as a relative unknown coming into relief situations or a spot start.

we need a young developing guy to cheaply back up who ever wins out the starting battle.  both keenum and heineke are FA after this year,  but I think Heineke has a better game as a back up and will likely come at a lower price tag which will be key for a team thinking about franchise tagging 1 QB, and paying the other over 2 million,  it wouldnt make sense to pay another backup 2 million per year or more.



I think that's a realistic hope - that Heinicke could become a competent backup. IMO either Bridgewater or Bradford will be gone a year from now, so we will need someone as a backup to whoever remains. 

Backup QBs like Keenum are relatively valuable, but only after they have proven they can handle coming in as a substitute for a few games - REAL GAMES. Heinicke has taken zero snaps in the NFL, so he is not going to be snatched away by other teams if we waive him to our PS.



Didn't a team grab Booty (hehe I said grab booty) off of our squad,.. and Thigpen?   Possibly not Booty but I'm sure Thigpen was.  Teams aren't looking for starters on practice squads... just backups and developmental guys.  I don't think anyone is saying he's a star... just that QBs with "Grit and Guts" are valued over "technical QBs with no passion" by some.    

Liked:
#86 · Aug 30, 11:08 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

It's all fun and games until that guy ends up filling in for Christian Ponder in a playoff game; then we immediately pull the plug and pretend it never happened.

Liked:
#87 · Aug 30, 11:50 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"StickyBun" said: Heinicke's lack of arm strength is alarming and it limits him big time. I don't see the love for the guy. All this gushing over a guy that was playing against absolute scrubs on that last drive.
And playing WITH absolute scrubs as well. Everyone always forgets that part. It all evens out. 

But the praise for Heinicke is not as much about what he's done this year, it's more about how he looked two years ago. Most impressed I've been with a rookie QB since Brad Johnson. Some don't see it I guess, but he's got something. And clearly I'm not alone in thinking that. Vikings gave a valuable roster spot to him rather than put him on the practice squad, exposing him to the wire. That says a lot about an undrafted kid from OD. 

Liked:
#88 · Aug 30, 11:54 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"StickyBun" said: Heinicke's lack of arm strength is alarming and it limits him big time. I don't see the love for the guy. All this gushing over a guy that was playing against absolute scrubs on that last drive.
And playing WITH absolute scrubs as well. Everyone always forgets that part. It all evens out. 

But the praise for Heinicke is not as much about what he's done this year, it's more about how he looked two years ago. Most impressed I've been with a rookie QB since Brad Johnson. Some don't see it I guess, but he's got something. And clearly I'm not alone in thinking that. Vikings gave a valuable roster spot to him rather than put him on the practice squad, exposing him to the wire. That says a lot about an undrafted kid from OD. 



Preseason games make for QB 'stars', happens every season. 'Stars' that get cut or win #3 jobs. I'd MUCH rather have Keenum backing up Bradford. Its not even close, IMO. And if Heinicke can't win the backup job, why keep him? Find another project because his time will have passed with Minnesota if he isn't the #2 to start the season. Maybe he will be? 

Minnesota is going to have to give serious consideration to keeping just 2 QBs (Bridgewater on PUP) to keep another guy on that super deep D-line talent. 

Liked:
#89 · Aug 30, 12:07 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"BlackMagic7" said: It's all fun and games until that guy ends up filling in for Christian Ponder in a playoff game; then we immediately pull the plug and pretend it never happened.
I think Heineke has already shown that he is an actual QB,  Webb was an athlete that was asked to play the position.
Liked:
#90 · Aug 30, 12:10 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"StickyBun" said:
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"StickyBun" said: Heinicke's lack of arm strength is alarming and it limits him big time. I don't see the love for the guy. All this gushing over a guy that was playing against absolute scrubs on that last drive.
And playing WITH absolute scrubs as well. Everyone always forgets that part. It all evens out. 

But the praise for Heinicke is not as much about what he's done this year, it's more about how he looked two years ago. Most impressed I've been with a rookie QB since Brad Johnson. Some don't see it I guess, but he's got something. And clearly I'm not alone in thinking that. Vikings gave a valuable roster spot to him rather than put him on the practice squad, exposing him to the wire. That says a lot about an undrafted kid from OD. 



Preseason games make for QB 'stars', happens every season. 'Stars' that get cut or win #3 jobs. I'd MUCH rather have Keenum backing up Bradford. Its not even close, IMO. And if Heinicke can't win the backup job, why keep him? Find another project because his time will have passed with Minnesota if he isn't the #2 to start the season. Maybe he will be? 

Minnesota is going to have to give serious consideration to keeping just 2 QBs (Bridgewater on PUP) to keep another guy on that super deep D-line talent. 


whats easier to find on the street,  a QB that knows your system or a LB that can play special teams?  I dont see needing to keep 6 LBs unless they really thing they have something special to work with because outside of Barr, Kendricks, and Gedeon I havent really seen much to jump up and down about,  why not keep the third QB and go with 5 LBs? ( that 3rd QB is more likely to see the field considering our offensive line woes and our LBs((outside of Kendricks)) inability to make contact with anybody.)

Liked:
#91 · Aug 30, 12:15 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

Give up on Heinicke?  Seems a bit early in his career to say his time has passed.  But I won't likely lose any sleep over our 3rd string QB.  Not at this part of the season anyway.

Liked:
#92 · Aug 30, 12:24 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

Maybe my memory is fading, has anyone ever seen Heinicke play against a starting defense?  I really am surprised by some of the hype surrounding this guy.

Liked:
#93 · Aug 30, 12:44 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

I agree with that Jimmy; but i think Webb had the "it factor" as well. Very much so; there was a lot of nuances to his passing game that made us do a double take.

He had wheels, but a lot of us liked his arm and his makeup as a passer.

... the point I was aiming for was just that the wheels can fall off the developmental wagon fast. Not steering this to a Webb conversation, just pointing out that we kind of played out the "developmental to starter" situation and it potentially bit us in the ass. We have 2 starting calibur QB already and a playoff calibur squad. And its not like Keenum has a bad track record - hes an overacheiver. He never was supposed to start in this league, he got out there and "proved it" I guess... 

... lol Im not trying to make a scene; i like Heineke and would love to see him succeed - he has a lot of folks rooting for him. I just dont think its that big of a deal at the end of the day; I like Keenum's experience if shit goes south. If we keep Heieneke, it'll be exciting if he needs to make a start.

Liked:
#94 · Aug 30, 12:58 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"BlackMagic7" said: I agree with that Jimmy; but i think Webb had the "it factor" as well. Very much so; there was a lot of nuances to his passing game that made us do a double take.

He had wheels, but a lot of us liked his arm and his makeup as a passer.

... the point I was aiming for was just that the wheels can fall off the developmental wagon fast. Not steering this to a Webb conversation, just pointing out that we kind of played out the "developmental to starter" situation and it potentially bit us in the ass. We have 2 starting calibur QB already and a playoff calibur squad. And its not like Keenum has a bad track record - hes an overacheiver. He never was supposed to start in this league, he got out there and "proved it" I guess... 

... lol Im not trying to make a scene; i like Heineke and would love to see him succeed - he has a lot of folks rooting for him. I just dont think its that big of a deal at the end of the day; I like Keenum's experience if shit goes south. If we keep Heieneke, it'll be exciting if he needs to make a start.

Spider had a big ass arm.... .just didnt know where the sucker was going to land.   :)

Liked:
#95 · Aug 30, 1:22 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

I'll be...source fails miserable yet again...go figure...

Liked:
#96 · Aug 31, 4:25 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

I believe there was a discrepancy and the fine line between being game ready and cleared to practice. If you aren't game ready and can protect yourself.. then you are unable to physically perform.
I feel Teddys camp probably pushed to be taken off PUP because he was going to be cleared to practice. I am going to guess they lost that fight.
Just my opinion that is.

Liked:
#97 · Aug 31, 5:48 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@e"Canthony" said: I believe there was a discrepancy and the fine line between being game ready and cleared to practice. If you aren't game ready and can protect yourself.. then you are unable to physically perform. I feel Teddys camp probably pushed to be taken off PUP because he was going to be cleared to practice. I am going to guess they lost that fight. Just my opinion that is.


But he hasn't been cleared to practice as far as I know, has he?

Liked:
#98 · Aug 31, 6:00 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"Purplewhizz" said:
@e"Canthony" said: I believe there was a discrepancy and the fine line between being game ready and cleared to practice. If you aren't game ready and can protect yourself.. then you are unable to physically perform. I feel Teddys camp probably pushed to be taken off PUP because he was going to be cleared to practice. I am going to guess they lost that fight. Just my opinion that is.


But he hasn't been cleared to practice as far as I know, has he?


Doesn't appear so as he was videod working out with Floyd away from the rest.  However he may be taking part in non contact parts of practice and doing his rehab drills during the more physical parts.

Liked:
#99 · Aug 31, 6:15 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"Canthony" said: I believe there was a discrepancy and the fine line between being game ready and cleared to practice. If you aren't game ready and can protect yourself.. then you are unable to physically perform. I feel Teddys camp probably pushed to be taken off PUP because he was going to be cleared to practice. I am going to guess they lost that fight. Just my opinion that is.


Are people still doubting that Bridgewater and Vikings management are at odds, or going to be, over the PUP/tolling idea, and it will likely get ugly? Good thing people are so pleased with his tweets about his faith..

Liked:
#100 · Aug 31, 7:33 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"Jor-El" said:
@"Canthony" said: I believe there was a discrepancy and the fine line between being game ready and cleared to practice. If you aren't game ready and can protect yourself.. then you are unable to physically perform. I feel Teddys camp probably pushed to be taken off PUP because he was going to be cleared to practice. I am going to guess they lost that fight. Just my opinion that is.


Are people still doubting that Bridgewater and Vikings management are at odds, or going to be, over the PUP/tolling idea, and it will likely get ugly? Good thing people are so pleased with his tweets about his faith..


I guess I am doubting it as a very good source told me a month ago that it was not a point of contention at that time and we have seen nothing to suggest otherwise since then.

Liked:
#101 · Aug 31, 7:42 AM
Log in to reply.

Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)

Warn Poster

Suspend User (3 days)

The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.

Forum The Longship Bridgewater returning?

Welcome to VikeFans!

Welcome back, Skol fans! This is our new home. Log in with your username or email and your existing password.


Be sure to check out the How To's and Questions forum for guides on getting around the new site, and use the Help Request forum if you run into anything that you need help with. Skol!