Jalen Nailor to the raiders
That one hurts
Good for Nailor, but now I think we can probably dismiss all the Addison trade rumors.
Didn’t make sense to pay him that kind of money here. He could be a nice piece for Vegas.
That's a real shame, as he seems to be on the same page with JJM...but, I guess that means we're keeping Addison despite trade rumors.
KOC, JJM, Flores...make a good plan, or you'll be following Kwesi....
Raiders had close to $112m in available cap space. The Vikings will probably miss Jalen, but I'm glad the Vikings didn't try to get in a bidding war with the them.
MaroonBells wrote:
Good for Nailor, but now I think we can probably dismiss all the Addison trade rumors.
Yup, Addison approves.
Hurry-up Vikings, we ain't getting any younger!
The big question now becomes does the team trust Tai Felton to step into that 3rd receiver role? Hard to say being we saw nothing from him last season
supafreak84 wrote:
The big question now becomes does the team trust Tai Felton to step into that 3rd receiver role? Hard to say being we saw nothing from him last season
LMK what McCardell says...His DNA is all over that pick.
Hurry-up Vikings, we ain't getting any younger!
Probably have to draft a WR somewhere in the mix and bring in a real cheap veteran.
Can’t really rely on Felton to be WR3 now or in the future given how little he played last year.
Don't shoot the messenger, but taking a receiver high in the draft might not be the worst idea in the world. Tate, Lemon, Tyson, Boston...any one of those guys could realistically be sitting on the board at 18. Do we trust Addison or do we even have any intention on giving him a big contract after the off the field stuff and the drops? The argument could be made...
supafreak84 wrote:
Don't shoot the messenger, but taking a receiver high in the draft might not be the worst idea in the world. Tate, Lemon, Tyson, Boston...any one of those guys could realistically be sitting on the board at 18. Do we trust Addison or do we even have any intention on giving him a big contract after the off the field stuff and the drops?
Koc luvs him WR's like Zimsu had a fetish for Corners...
Hurry-up Vikings, we ain't getting any younger!
purplefaithful wrote:
Koc luvs him WR's like Zimsu had a fetish for Corners...
Well, we certainly know he wants to throw it all over the field so you need the horses at receiver to do that
JR44 wrote:
Not sure how 69 receptions over 4 seasons gets you 35 million, amazing
There were reportedly over 10 teams in on Nailor. It's not about 69 receptions over an injury plagued first three seasons. It's about how he looked when he was healthy.
What the Vikings lost when Nailor agreed to a nice three-year deal with the Raiders (worth up to $35 million with $23 million guaranteed) goes beyond just his modest production (28 and 29 catches the last two years).
Of those 57 catches, 47 went for first downs.
He had just one drop last season.
He was one of the few Vikings pass-catchers who developed consistent chemistry with J.J. McCarthy, and Nailor made the key catch that sealed Minnesota’s best win of the year at Detroit. A good third receiver isn’t irreplaceable. But it’s the sort of thing you notice when you don’t have it.
Nailor’s departure also sets up a key year for (and decision on) Jordan Addison.
Will the Vikings pick up his fifth-year option for 2027 — at a cost estimated at $18 million for that season, and a decision that needs to be made by May 1? That’s a lot of money for a player who has faced off-field issues and who had a subpar year in 2025 (career-low 42 catches and a career-high six drops). But declining the option after losing Nailor would leave the Vikings’ WR depth perilously thin behind Justin Jefferson heading into next year.
Strib
Hurry-up Vikings, we ain't getting any younger!
Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)
Warn Poster
Suspend User (3 days)
The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.