Forum The Longship Kipers new Mock

Kipers new Mock

supafreak84
Joined Jan 2014
1,318 posts
Rep: 1,433

Just released today. He has the Vikings landing McCarthy at pick #11 (without having tobmove up), and then taking Cooper Dejean with the 23rd pick. Talk about best case scenario if we can't move up for Drake Maye. 

Looking at the board if we were able to keep the 23rd pick, there should be some interesting talent on the board. Latu, Chop Robinson, both Texas receivers, the Oregon center. 

#1 · Mar 19, 9:19 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

I dont think anyone wants JJ gone.  He is gonna test the market, fine, you need to pay him his money.  Problem may be he wants to reset the market money wise AND term wise.  

Now thats a problem if true and you dont just hand him the bag, it would be dumb business.  Most likely it will get done, but never say never is dumb.  

Hes not getting traded anyway without a new deal in place Soooo.  

#22 · Mar 20, 11:40 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"Bullazin" said: I dont think anyone wants JJ gone.  He is gonna test the market, fine, you need to pay him his money.  Problem may be he wants to reset the market money wise AND term wise.  

Now thats a problem if true and you dont just hand him the bag, it would be dumb business.  Most likely it will get done, but never say never is dumb.  

Hes not getting traded anyway without a new deal in place Soooo.  


Yes nobody wants him gone, but if the only we you can acquire the franchise QB we want and need is by trading Jefferson, I think that has to be a legitimate conversation at this point. All options have to be on the table 

#23 · Mar 20, 11:52 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"supafreak84" said:
@"Bullazin" said: I dont think anyone wants JJ gone.  He is gonna test the market, fine, you need to pay him his money.  Problem may be he wants to reset the market money wise AND term wise.  

Now thats a problem if true and you dont just hand him the bag, it would be dumb business.  Most likely it will get done, but never say never is dumb.  

Hes not getting traded anyway without a new deal in place Soooo.  


Yes nobody wants him gone, but if the only we you can acquire the franchise QB we want and need is by trading Jefferson, I think that has to be a legitimate conversation at this point. All options have to be on the table 


I don't think trading the 24 year old best WRer in the NFL should be on the table for any unknown quantity. This angst that some fans have over paying a premier player money is just weird. If you're guaranteed a franchise QB, well then of course. There aren't any guarantees other than that JJ is a proven premier quantity.

#24 · Mar 20, 12:08 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"StickyBun" said:
@"supafreak84" said:
@"Bullazin" said: I dont think anyone wants JJ gone.  He is gonna test the market, fine, you need to pay him his money.  Problem may be he wants to reset the market money wise AND term wise.  

Now thats a problem if true and you dont just hand him the bag, it would be dumb business.  Most likely it will get done, but never say never is dumb.  

Hes not getting traded anyway without a new deal in place Soooo.  


Yes nobody wants him gone, but if the only we you can acquire the franchise QB we want and need is by trading Jefferson, I think that has to be a legitimate conversation at this point. All options have to be on the table 


I don't think trading the 24 year old best WRer in the NFL should be on the table for any unknown quantity. This angst that some fans have over paying a premier player money is just weird. 


We can pay him and I don't think anybody thinks he's not deserving, but if we don't have a QB and get the one we want...what's the point? We've done this with premier skill position players FOR YEARS and haven't done shit because we didn't have a QB who could get us over the hump. Let's actually fix that for a change and if the cost is moving Jefferson to acquire the draft capital to do it, why wouldn't you? Especially in light of the strange contract negotiations 

#25 · Mar 20, 12:13 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

Shit, I’m still pissed they traded Randy, what the hell do I know…!?  :s  boy, sure seems some really want to take the “competitive” out of this rebuild!  :s 

#26 · Mar 20, 12:16 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"supafreak84" said:
@"StickyBun" said:
@"supafreak84" said:
@"Bullazin" said: I dont think anyone wants JJ gone.  He is gonna test the market, fine, you need to pay him his money.  Problem may be he wants to reset the market money wise AND term wise.  

Now thats a problem if true and you dont just hand him the bag, it would be dumb business.  Most likely it will get done, but never say never is dumb.  

Hes not getting traded anyway without a new deal in place Soooo.  


Yes nobody wants him gone, but if the only we you can acquire the franchise QB we want and need is by trading Jefferson, I think that has to be a legitimate conversation at this point. All options have to be on the table 


I don't think trading the 24 year old best WRer in the NFL should be on the table for any unknown quantity. This angst that some fans have over paying a premier player money is just weird. 


We can pay him and I don't think anybody thinks he's not deserving, but if we don't have a QB and get the one we want...what's the point? We've done this with premier skill position players FOR YEARS and haven't done shit because we didn't have a QB who could get us over the hump. Let's actually fix that for a change and if the cost is moving Jefferson to acquire the draft capital to do it, why wouldn't you? Especially in light of the strange contract negotiations 


The issue is there's no guarantees the swing for the QB will work. Its much easier to give up other draft compensation for a risky unknown quantity than give up a highly productive, premier elite talent known quantity like JJ at only 24 years old. That's just stupid. Its like exchanging gold for cryptocurrency. We wouldn't be getting Andrew Luck or Peyton Manning. We'd be getting Drake Maye or Jayden Daniels. Hell, we wouldn't even be getting Caleb Williams. Not sure how any of that would compute.

#27 · Mar 20, 12:23 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

You improve the chances of a rookie QB to succeed by surrounding him w/ premier players. Look no further than Purdy. Keep both JJ & CD.

#28 · Mar 20, 1:18 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"StickyBun" said:
@"supafreak84" said:
@"StickyBun" said:
@"supafreak84" said:
@"Bullazin" said: I dont think anyone wants JJ gone.  He is gonna test the market, fine, you need to pay him his money.  Problem may be he wants to reset the market money wise AND term wise.  

Now thats a problem if true and you dont just hand him the bag, it would be dumb business.  Most likely it will get done, but never say never is dumb.  

Hes not getting traded anyway without a new deal in place Soooo.  


Yes nobody wants him gone, but if the only we you can acquire the franchise QB we want and need is by trading Jefferson, I think that has to be a legitimate conversation at this point. All options have to be on the table 


I don't think trading the 24 year old best WRer in the NFL should be on the table for any unknown quantity. This angst that some fans have over paying a premier player money is just weird. 


We can pay him and I don't think anybody thinks he's not deserving, but if we don't have a QB and get the one we want...what's the point? We've done this with premier skill position players FOR YEARS and haven't done shit because we didn't have a QB who could get us over the hump. Let's actually fix that for a change and if the cost is moving Jefferson to acquire the draft capital to do it, why wouldn't you? Especially in light of the strange contract negotiations 


The issue is there's no guarantees the swing for the QB will work. Its much easier to give up other draft compensation for a risky unknown quantity than give up a highly productive, premier elite talent known quantity like JJ at only 24 years old. That's just stupid. Its like exchanging gold for cryptocurrency. We wouldn't be getting Andrew Luck or Peyton Manning. We'd be getting Drake Maye or Jayden Daniels. Hell, we wouldn't even be getting Caleb Williams. Not sure how any of that would compute.


Absolutely it's always better to have the sure thing, but say we are absolutely convinced Drake Maye is our guy and the franchise QB we have needed forever, but the only way to get him was to either move Jefferson in a trade or mortgage our future and strip our next two drafts down to almost nothing to move up and get him? To me, I'm moving Jefferson, grabbing the QB I want, and not only retaining picks, but adding picks to fill in our roster holes with young talent. Not that I'd ever want to see Jefferson traded, but it would make sense 

#29 · Mar 20, 1:42 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

From GBN

Rumor du jour: Vikes, Pats close to swapping picks … Just a quick follow-up to yesterday’s story on the growing buzz surrounding Minnesota’s attempt to move up in the draft from the 11th pick overall to a position where they could get one of this year’s top QBs after acquiring an extra 1st from Houston, but there was a palpable buzz earlier today that the Vikings are ‘close’ to a deal with New England in which Minnesota would get the 3rd pick overall, presumably where they would select North Carolina QB Drake Maye, in exchange for a monster package of picks that could include the Vikings two first rounders this year and their #1 in
 2025.

So this is what I was referencing. Everybody good giving up this kind of picks package to move up? Also considering that the 2025 pick may very well be a top 5 or top 10 pick

#30 · Mar 20, 6:56 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"supafreak84" said: From GBN

Rumor du jour: Vikes, Pats close to swapping picks … Just a quick follow-up to yesterday’s story on the growing buzz surrounding Minnesota’s attempt to move up in the draft from the 11th pick overall to a position where they could get one of this year’s top QBs after acquiring an extra 1st from Houston, but there was a palpable buzz earlier today that the Vikings are ‘close’ to a deal with New England in which Minnesota would get the 3rd pick overall, presumably where they would select North Carolina QB Drake Maye, in exchange for a monster package of picks that could include the Vikings two first rounders this year and their #1 in
 2025.

So this is what I was referencing. Everybody good giving up this kind of picks package to move up? Also considering that the 2025 pick may very well be a top 5 or top 10 pick


I’m fine with it. If it works we hit the jackpot. If it doesn’t well we won 7 games last year so its not like we blew up a juggernaut. A jackpot sounds nice to me. Let’s give it a shot!

#31 · Mar 20, 8:16 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"supafreak84" said: From GBN

Rumor du jour: Vikes, Pats close to swapping picks … Just a quick follow-up to yesterday’s story on the growing buzz surrounding Minnesota’s attempt to move up in the draft from the 11th pick overall to a position where they could get one of this year’s top QBs after acquiring an extra 1st from Houston, but there was a palpable buzz earlier today that the Vikings are ‘close’ to a deal with New England in which Minnesota would get the 3rd pick overall, presumably where they would select North Carolina QB Drake Maye, in exchange for a monster package of picks that could include the Vikings two first rounders this year and their #1 in
 2025.

So this is what I was referencing. Everybody good giving up this kind of picks package to move up? Also considering that the 2025 pick may very well be a top 5 or top 10 pick


For sure.  If the Vikings think they can get a franchise QB for that price and we hit...  No one will care about missing out on a couple prospects that may or may not be good in 2024 and 2025.

Now like I said earlier, even if the player we take busts, we probably don't know that until the end of the 2025 season.  And if he busts, we're probably picking early in the 2026 draft where we'll have a first round pick again to take another shot.

#32 · Mar 20, 8:47 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

If we hit on the QB I don't care about the draft capital. Next year they will be in a position to plug quite a few holes with younger free agents that have already proven they are players in the NFL.

#33 · Mar 20, 10:08 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

The only reason JJM fell to us in Kiper's mock is that he doesn't include trades in his mocks. With both the Broncos and Raiders right behind us needing a QB I can't imagine 1 of them not jumping us if we stay at 11.  For that matter the Saints at 14 and Seahawks at 16 could get ambitious.  After that.... elevator shaft to the top of the 2nd.

#34 · Mar 20, 11:45 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"supafreak84" said: From GBN

Rumor du jour: Vikes, Pats close to swapping picks … Just a quick follow-up to yesterday’s story on the growing buzz surrounding Minnesota’s attempt to move up in the draft from the 11th pick overall to a position where they could get one of this year’s top QBs after acquiring an extra 1st from Houston, but there was a palpable buzz earlier today that the Vikings are ‘close’ to a deal with New England in which Minnesota would get the 3rd pick overall, presumably where they would select North Carolina QB Drake Maye, in exchange for a monster package of picks that could include the Vikings two first rounders this year and their #1 in
 2025.

So this is what I was referencing. Everybody good giving up this kind of picks package to move up? Also considering that the 2025 pick may very well be a top 5 or top 10 pick


Yep. It beats the shit out of giving up JJ in a trade. These are unknown quantities.....draft picks that get squandered every single year by most teams. You trade JJ and then you'll need to draft a WRer because it'll be a need pick, how dumb is that? Minnesota won't be drafting top 5 next year, lets not get dramatic. 

You said you need to swing for the fences to get a 'franchise QB'....this is how you do it. Its not about being ok with it as a fan, its just what has to happen if you want a top tier potential rookie QB. Its a big risk. Nobody's going to deny that. I'm still not convinced however that Minnesota is looking to move up that far.

#35 · Mar 21, 3:10 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
#36 · Mar 21, 4:54 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"supafreak84" said: From GBN

Rumor du jour: Vikes, Pats close to swapping picks … Just a quick follow-up to yesterday’s story on the growing buzz surrounding Minnesota’s attempt to move up in the draft from the 11th pick overall to a position where they could get one of this year’s top QBs after acquiring an extra 1st from Houston, but there was a palpable buzz earlier today that the Vikings are ‘close’ to a deal with New England in which Minnesota would get the 3rd pick overall, presumably where they would select North Carolina QB Drake Maye, in exchange for a monster package of picks that could include the Vikings two first rounders this year and their #1 in
 2025.

So this is what I was referencing. Everybody good giving up this kind of picks package to move up? Also considering that the 2025 pick may very well be a top 5 or top 10 pick


Absolutely. I'd even throw in a 3rd rounder if that's what it took. If you hit on a franchise QB and put him into one of the best surrounds in the NFL, and get to pay him peanuts for 4 years, nobody's going to give a damn about what it took to get him. 

#37 · Mar 21, 6:26 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"supafreak84" said: From GBN

Rumor du jour: Vikes, Pats close to swapping picks … Just a quick follow-up to yesterday’s story on the growing buzz surrounding Minnesota’s attempt to move up in the draft from the 11th pick overall to a position where they could get one of this year’s top QBs after acquiring an extra 1st from Houston, but there was a palpable buzz earlier today that the Vikings are ‘close’ to a deal with New England in which Minnesota would get the 3rd pick overall, presumably where they would select North Carolina QB Drake Maye, in exchange for a monster package of picks that could include the Vikings two first rounders this year and their #1 in
 2025.

So this is what I was referencing. Everybody good giving up this kind of picks package to move up? Also considering that the 2025 pick may very well be a top 5 or top 10 pick

If the trade actually happens then this is the hill that this regime has chosen to die on. I do think that if they draft Maye or any QB in this draft that both KOC & Kwesi will be extended in order to give that QB adequate time to develop. But, no doubt if they swing & miss, it'll be the end for this regime.

#38 · Mar 21, 7:01 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"StickyBun" said:
@"supafreak84" said: From GBN

Rumor du jour: Vikes, Pats close to swapping picks … Just a quick follow-up to yesterday’s story on the growing buzz surrounding Minnesota’s attempt to move up in the draft from the 11th pick overall to a position where they could get one of this year’s top QBs after acquiring an extra 1st from Houston, but there was a palpable buzz earlier today that the Vikings are ‘close’ to a deal with New England in which Minnesota would get the 3rd pick overall, presumably where they would select North Carolina QB Drake Maye, in exchange for a monster package of picks that could include the Vikings two first rounders this year and their #1 in
 2025.

So this is what I was referencing. Everybody good giving up this kind of picks package to move up? Also considering that the 2025 pick may very well be a top 5 or top 10 pick


Yep. It beats the shit out of giving up JJ in a trade. These are unknown quantities.....draft picks that get squandered every single year by most teams. You trade JJ and then you'll need to draft a WRer because it'll be a need pick, how dumb is that? Minnesota won't be drafting top 5 next year, lets not get dramatic. 

You said you need to swing for the fences to get a 'franchise QB'....this is how you do it. Its not about being ok with it as a fan, its just what has to happen if you want a top tier potential rookie QB. Its a big risk. Nobody's going to deny that. I'm still not convinced however that Minnesota is looking to move up that far.



I just think you have to be careful how you allocate that draft haul in a trade. Ask the Panthers, who also thought it was dramatic to think they'd be drafting in the top 5 again in 2024.  It happens, especially with a rookie QB. You give up that haul, you essentially are going to have a one player draft the next two seasons. If that player turns out to be Andrew Luck, great, if not....you are in deep deep doodoo. 

#39 · Mar 21, 7:02 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"supafreak84" said: From GBN

Rumor du jour: Vikes, Pats close to swapping picks … Just a quick follow-up to yesterday’s story on the growing buzz surrounding Minnesota’s attempt to move up in the draft from the 11th pick overall to a position where they could get one of this year’s top QBs after acquiring an extra 1st from Houston, but there was a palpable buzz earlier today that the Vikings are ‘close’ to a deal with New England in which Minnesota would get the 3rd pick overall, presumably where they would select North Carolina QB Drake Maye, in exchange for a monster package of picks that could include the Vikings two first rounders this year and their #1 in
 2025.

So this is what I was referencing. Everybody good giving up this kind of picks package to move up? Also considering that the 2025 pick may very well be a top 5 or top 10 pick


Absolutely. I'd even throw in a 3rd rounder if that's what it took. If you hit on a franchise QB and put him into one of the best surrounds in the NFL, and get to pay him peanuts for 4 years, nobody's going to give a damn about what it took to get him. 


It may very well take some additional garnishment (as to how the media draftniks refer to it)...

Am I comfortable giving up this much capital? NO

 More importantly, do I trust the org to pick the right guy? Sometimes
 
 I dont believe the system is flawed in choosing QB's from the college ranks. Rather I believe a very high % of these kids are ruined coming into bad situations. 

 Do I think the Vikings offer more positives (vs the avg team) in terms of surround to curate a QB?  YES 

 Do I think the Vikings will eventually move up that high in the draft? No, but it may not be for lack of trying

#40 · Mar 21, 7:12 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"supafreak84" said:
@"StickyBun" said:
@"supafreak84" said: From GBN

Rumor du jour: Vikes, Pats close to swapping picks … Just a quick follow-up to yesterday’s story on the growing buzz surrounding Minnesota’s attempt to move up in the draft from the 11th pick overall to a position where they could get one of this year’s top QBs after acquiring an extra 1st from Houston, but there was a palpable buzz earlier today that the Vikings are ‘close’ to a deal with New England in which Minnesota would get the 3rd pick overall, presumably where they would select North Carolina QB Drake Maye, in exchange for a monster package of picks that could include the Vikings two first rounders this year and their #1 in
 2025.

So this is what I was referencing. Everybody good giving up this kind of picks package to move up? Also considering that the 2025 pick may very well be a top 5 or top 10 pick


Yep. It beats the shit out of giving up JJ in a trade. These are unknown quantities.....draft picks that get squandered every single year by most teams. You trade JJ and then you'll need to draft a WRer because it'll be a need pick, how dumb is that? Minnesota won't be drafting top 5 next year, lets not get dramatic. 

You said you need to swing for the fences to get a 'franchise QB'....this is how you do it. Its not about being ok with it as a fan, its just what has to happen if you want a top tier potential rookie QB. Its a big risk. Nobody's going to deny that. I'm still not convinced however that Minnesota is looking to move up that far.



I just think you have to be careful how you allocate that draft haul in a trade. Ask the Panthers, who also thought it was dramatic to think they'd be drafting in the top 5 again in 2024.  It happens, especially with a rookie QB. You give up that haul, you essentially are going to have a one player draft the next two seasons. If that player turns out to be Andrew Luck, great, if not....you are in deep deep doodoo. 


Panther's and Viking's rosters are two very different things. And we aren't starting a rookie QB....guaranteed that isn't KOC's plan. Would a highly drafted rookie start a few games at the end of the year if Minnesota isn't in sniffing range of the playoffs? Sure. Just wondering how you'd feel to watch JJ light it up for another team and do what he does and then see the rookie QB tank? Its just not going to happen, trading JJ. And it shouldn't. Its much better to trade up using draft picks. 

#41 · Mar 21, 7:17 AM
Log in to reply.

Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)

Warn Poster

Suspend User (3 days)

The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.

Forum The Longship Kipers new Mock

Welcome to VikeFans!

Welcome back, Skol fans! This is our new home. Log in with your username or email and your existing password.


Be sure to check out the How To's and Questions forum for guides on getting around the new site, and use the Help Request forum if you run into anything that you need help with. Skol!