Forum › The Longship › Cash More Important than Cap

Cash More Important than Cap

SM
smleh
Joined Feb 2024
13 posts
Rep: 18
Separating Fact From Fiction Over How the NFL Salary 
  • As we move toward the closest thing the NFL has to a true offseason, I thought it would be a good time to separate some fact from fiction about that amorphous thing called the salary cap. There is nothing in the massive machine of NFL information and coverage that is more misrepresented, misdiagnosed and often misinformed than discussion around the cap. Let’s examine what it is and, more importantly, what it isn’t through a few myths, with the theme being: It’s the cash, stupid, not the cap.
Myth No. 1: Cap matters as much as, or even more than, cash No. Let’s make this very simple: Cash is real money; cap is simply accounting.  Cash is what a player will actually receive in a contract. Cap is a mechanism of compliance, a way NFL teams account for a contract over the life of the deal.  And through the NFL’s systematic magic of signing and option bonus proration—spreading out the cap impact of bonuses over the term of the deal—cap can be adjusted to provide short-term gain for long-term pain.
In analyzing a player contract or a team payroll, many fans (and even media) focus on cap impacts. I am here to tell you to stop doing that. What matters is the cash, not the cap. Cash is real money in and real money out. Cap is simply bookkeeping. Even dead money—leftover nonroster charges for players no longer with the team—is merely unamortized proration clogging up the pipes of the overall cap. It is not cash. When I was negotiating contracts on the team side for many years, I would have agents start to tell me how they could make our deal cap-friendly. I would cut them off. “I’m going to stop you right there,” I would say. “Our cap is none of your concern. I am paid quite well to manage and handle our cap. I’ll worry about that; you worry about your player. Are we clear?”
NFL teams have (now several) people paid to manage their cap books. They may choose management strategies that are team-friendly early and team-unfriendly late or more balanced. Cap can be easily moved around by a first-year NFL cap manager as much as an experienced one. The point is that it can be managed. The key for me as a negotiator, and an analyst, is always the same: What’s the cash? Year 1? The first three years? The first four years? And on and on. Cash matters a lot more than cap. Myth No. 2: Elite players should take less to “help the team win” No. Less cap? Sure. Less cash? No.
If top players, especially quarterbacks, want to facilitate the signing of other important players on the team—we can debate whether that is their role, but even if we allow for it—there is a way they can easily do that, and hundreds of players have. They can simply do a cap restructure of their contracts: converting their large salaries into signing bonuses, thereby pushing out cap charges into the future years through proration. These are cap restructures done by every team in the NFL. The player receives the exact same money he was scheduled to receive, sometimes even with better cash flow and an earlier payment schedule. So, you ask, what is the myth? Well, the myth is that a player needs to take less cash—not just cap—to help the team. There are fans, media and, unfortunately, even players who believe this, and it is wrong. 
Taking less cash only hurts the player and helps the owner, who is paying less than he should. NFL owners all have assets worth over $2 billion; they do not need players to sacrifice any cash in their contracts. It is quite enough for players to help the team to provide more cap; they certainly do not provide them more cash. Two players come to mind immediately. I have talked often about Tom Brady and the Patriots over the years. He not only did several cap restructures, but for some reason (there are many theories), he also took less cash compared to other top-echelon quarterbacks from those days. And the Patriots (1) did not need the cash and (2) were a mid-to-low payroll team throughout those years.
The present-day comparable is Patrick Mahomes, owner of a ridiculously long and highly undervalued contract. Mahomes, whose contract was under market soon after he signed it and locked himself in for 12 years, talks often about helping the team sign other players. To Patrick: Cap restructures do that; do not sacrifice your cash earnings! So when you read about a player saying he “took less” to help the team sign other players, know that he is being bamboozled by the team, or his agent, or the media, or whomever. He can always sacrifice short-term cap, but he is only hurting himself—not the team, not other players—by taking less money. Thus, we are back to where we started about the cap. The only people to whom cap numbers matter are the team and league officials who monitor compliance with it. For everyone else, it’s a shiny object that has no true impact in the business of football. Once again … Cash is what matters, not cap.
#1 · Feb 15, 6:41 AM
DE
deleted_user
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

Then why have a cap at all?  Because it is a way of keeping deep pocket owners from buying a superbowl,  so while I see the premise,   that deferred cap hits for cash up front are still hurting the teams ability to compete,  just maybe not in the year the cash was paid out.   So yes a over priced contract can hurt the franchise,   not just the owner.

#2 · Feb 15, 7:06 AM
DE
deleted_user
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

The only requirement is that teams spend a minimum of 90 percent of cap in cash over three year tranches. The new tranch is 24-26. The Browns actual payroll was more than $ 60 million than Vikings last year. They wanted to pay Dalvin Tomlinson and Vikings didn’t. The “cap” is a convenient excuse for teams than don’t want to spend. Vikings were 26th in payroll in 22, 22nd in 23. For 24 currently ranked 26th.

#3 · Feb 15, 7:14 AM
DE
deleted_user
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

Good info here. Thanks for posting this. 

#4 · Feb 15, 8:00 AM
DE
deleted_user
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"smleh" said: The only requirement is that teams spend a minimum of 90 percent of cap in cash over three year tranches. The new tranch is 24-26. The Browns actual payroll was more than $ 60 million than Vikings last year. They wanted to pay Dalvin Tomlinson and Vikings didn’t. The “cap” is a convenient excuse for teams than don’t want to spend. Vikings were 26th in payroll in 22, 22nd in 23. For 24 currently ranked 26th.
Well of they had to spend 90% and they were that low in 22 and 23,  they must have been ranked much higher in 21,  but in your saying payroll,   is that in cap or cash?  If it's cap that may just mean they had already paid it out in previous years and couldn't fit more cap under that year's cap.  I don't recall them carrying much spare cap the last few years so they are spending it somewhere. 
#5 · Feb 15, 5:59 PM
DE
deleted_user
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

Ok, then let's pay JJ 35 mil, Cousins 45 mil, Hunter 30 mil, and sign the top 4 free agents.

#6 · Feb 15, 8:02 PM
DE
deleted_user
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

I like Andrew Brandt, but whenever I hear someone making an argument, I wonder about their incentives and motivation. What is in it for them?

Andrew used to be on the team side of the game. I believe he is now on the player side. His incentive now is to tell players to get as much as they can; pay no attention to the cap; any time a player is released as a cap casualty that is just an owner who does not want to pay the player what he is worth. And he says that when he was negotiating for the Packers he would tell agents to make sure they got as much cash as possible for their player-clients and not to consider the cap at all. I am not ready to buy that one either. "Are we clear?"

And the notion that Brady and Mahomes have been bamboozled into accepting less cash in order to help out their billionaire owners is also hard for me to accept at face value. 

Maybe everything Andrew said that is 100% true. Maybe. But I'm not ready to buy his argument yet. I will reserve judgment until we hear from the other side.

#7 · Feb 17, 1:06 PM
DE
deleted_user
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
#8 · Feb 18, 4:34 AM
DE
deleted_user
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"StickyBun" said: https://twitter.com/vikingzfanpage/status/1759045463624319429?s=19
I'm a little worried that Kwesi might be a little too myopic in his approach to football finances. If you wanna win the game, you have to PLAY the game, even if it means spending more than you intended. Even if it means changing your mind or tweaking your long-term vision to accommodate for new and different information. 
#9 · Feb 18, 8:30 AM
DE
deleted_user
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

Adding $7M to everyone's cap space is no small thing. 

The 2024 salary cap is coming. Some are expecting it to be in the range of $242 million to $243 million per team. At least one source said in response to that, "More."
Another source says it will be closer to $250 million than $243 million.
#10 · Feb 19, 1:56 PM
DE
deleted_user
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"MaroonBells" said: Adding $7M to everyone's cap space is no small thing. 
The 2024 salary cap is coming. Some are expecting it to be in the range of $242 million to $243 million per team. At least one source said in response to that, "More."
Another source says it will be closer to $250 million than $243 million.
Well, 

Its $12 for McDonalds now, might as well be $250mm for an NFL Cap ;)

#11 · Feb 19, 2:48 PM
DE
deleted_user
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"StickyBun" said: https://twitter.com/vikingzfanpage/status/1759045463624319429?s=19
I'm a little worried that Kwesi might be a little too myopic in his approach to football finances. If you wanna win the game, you have to PLAY the game, even if it means spending more than you intended. Even if it means changing your mind or tweaking your long-term vision to accommodate for new and different information. 



This is likely getting made into a bigger deal than it needs to be. The Packers, Steelers, amongst others don't guarantee money at signing past year 1 either. The Vikings historically have offered signing bonuses and vesting guarantees in years 2 and 3. The dead money would be so large in years 2/3 its basically impossible to get out of the deal so its an effective guarantee vs. one in writing. Each side will posture but I fully believe they won't mess around with JJ too much. 

#12 · Feb 19, 7:23 PM
DE
deleted_user
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"Geoff Nichols" said:
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"StickyBun" said: https://twitter.com/vikingzfanpage/status/1759045463624319429?s=19
I'm a little worried that Kwesi might be a little too myopic in his approach to football finances. If you wanna win the game, you have to PLAY the game, even if it means spending more than you intended. Even if it means changing your mind or tweaking your long-term vision to accommodate for new and different information. 


 Each side will posture but I fully believe they won't mess around with JJ too much. 


That's all this is. This deal will get done.

#13 · Feb 20, 5:26 AM
DE
deleted_user
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"StickyBun" said:
@"Geoff Nichols" said:
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"StickyBun" said: https://twitter.com/vikingzfanpage/status/1759045463624319429?s=19
I'm a little worried that Kwesi might be a little too myopic in his approach to football finances. If you wanna win the game, you have to PLAY the game, even if it means spending more than you intended. Even if it means changing your mind or tweaking your long-term vision to accommodate for new and different information. 


 Each side will posture but I fully believe they won't mess around with JJ too much. 


That's all this is. This deal will get done.


Exactly how I feel.

#14 · Feb 26, 9:21 AM
Log in to reply.

Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)

Warn Poster

Suspend User (3 days)

The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.

Forum › The Longship › Cash More Important than Cap

Welcome to VikeFans!

Welcome back, Skol fans! This is our new home. Log in with your username or email and your existing password.


Be sure to check out the How To's and Questions forum for guides on getting around the new site, and use the Help Request forum if you run into anything that you need help with. Skol!