Bears GM Ryan Poles won’t get to decide HC Matt Eberflus’ 2024 fate
More Bears dysfunction:
Report: Bears GM Ryan Poles won’t get to decide HC Matt Eberflus’ 2024 fate (msn.com)
Getting ugly in Chi Town.
I can't see the Bears sticking with Justin Fields. But they won't give him away, either.

@"MaroonBells" said: Getting ugly in Chi Town.I hope they f this up...
Getsy out in Chicago. Does this make it more or less likely they keep Fields? I've heard both sides.
On one hand, it may mean they put more of the blame on the coaches than the player, and so may stick with Fields. On the other, it means Justin Fields will be learning his 3rd offense in four seasons. Never a good thing for a QB.
@"MaroonBells" said: Getsy out in Chicago. Does this make it more or less likely they keep Fields? I've heard both sides.On one hand, it may mean they put more of the blame on the coaches than the player, and so may stick with Fields. On the other, it means Justin Fields will be learning his 3rd offense in four seasons. Never a good thing for a QB.
Like reading tea leaves when it comes to the Bears. Hope they pass on QB's with both top 10 picks and leave us more options.
@"MaroonBells" said: Getsy out in Chicago. Does this make it more or less likely they keep Fields? I've heard both sides.On one hand, it may mean they put more of the blame on the coaches than the player, and so may stick with Fields. On the other, it means Justin Fields will be learning his 3rd offense in four seasons. Never a good thing for a QB.
Feel like it still leaves the decision in limbo. I tend to think they'll give Fields one more season unless they are absolutely convinced Williams/Maye/Daniels could be a top 5 QB in the NFL. If they trade back, even staying within the top 3 they can add Marvin Harrison Jr. or Nabers. Can add O-line or D-line at #9. Then will get even more future picks they could still use to leverage in a trade-up for a QB they identify if needed.
@"Geoff Nichols" said:@"MaroonBells" said: Getsy out in Chicago. Does this make it more or less likely they keep Fields? I've heard both sides.On one hand, it may mean they put more of the blame on the coaches than the player, and so may stick with Fields. On the other, it means Justin Fields will be learning his 3rd offense in four seasons. Never a good thing for a QB.
Feel like it still leaves the decision in limbo. I tend to think they'll give Fields one more season unless they are absolutely convinced Williams/Maye/Daniels could be a top 5 QB in the NFL. If they trade back, even staying within the top 3 they can add Marvin Harrison Jr. or Nabers. Can add O-line or D-line at #9. Then will get even more future picks they could still use to leverage in a trade-up for a QB they identify if needed.
I'm not a big Justin Fields fan, but I think this decision for them is huge. If the Bears move on from Fields and take Caleb Williams, and then he either refuses to sign, or worse, busts, while Fields goes on to have a decent career elsewhere, the egg on their face will be legendary.With that in mind, I can see them keeping Fields, trading back to 3 and taking MHJ. And of course that helps us a lot because it means one of the top 3 QBs now falls to 4, and Arizona is set to make a fortune from all the teams competing to trade up for the last blue-chip QB. The Vikings will almost certainly be one of them.
Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)
Warn Poster
Suspend User (3 days)
The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.