Forum The Longship Chicago tells Bears.... not so fast!

Chicago tells Bears.... not so fast!

JimmyinSD
JimmyinSD
Admin
Joined May 2013
1,754 posts
Rep: 1,867

Looks like the windy city is trying to make a bid to keep the team downtown.  Not sure if this is the most financially responsible use of public funds in a town on its ass,   but its not my tax dollars so....

this looks pretty nice,  but I see it being way over budget and way pared down from what we are being shown, once the union machine in Chicago gets involved.

Why isn't Chuck Foreman in the Hall of Fame?

#1 · Jan 9, 1:40 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"JimmyinSD" said: Looks like the windy city is trying to make a bid to keep the team downtown.  Not sure if this is the most financially responsible use of public funds in a town on its ass,   but its not my tax dollars so....

this looks pretty nice,  but I see it being way over budget and way pared down from what we are being shown, once the union machine in Chicago gets involved.


I remember the story about how the workers buried in Hoover dam cuz they couldn't stop pouring once they started.  Wonder how that story will play out in downtown Chicago?

And I thought they just renovated it a few years back.  Or am I that old already?

#2 · Jan 9, 1:47 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

I mean they already fucked it up 

#3 · Jan 9, 1:48 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"greediron" said:
@"JimmyinSD" said: Looks like the windy city is trying to make a bid to keep the team downtown.  Not sure if this is the most financially responsible use of public funds in a town on its ass,   but its not my tax dollars so....

this looks pretty nice,  but I see it being way over budget and way pared down from what we are being shown, once the union machine in Chicago gets involved.


I remember the story about how the workers buried in Hoover dam cuz they couldn't stop pouring once they started.  Wonder how that story will play out in downtown Chicago?

And I thought they just renovated it a few years back.  Or am I that old already?



you are that old already.   :)

#4 · Jan 9, 2:20 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

Very reminiscent of USB inside. 

Whichever stadium proposal makes the family the most $ will win. 

Soldier Field with a roof? Dayum, that just doesn't sound right.

#5 · Jan 9, 3:39 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"purplefaithful" said: Very reminiscent of USB inside. 

Whichever stadium proposal makes the family the most $ will win. 

Soldier Field with a roof? Dayum, that just doesn't sound right.


Will they still find a way to have a shitty field?

#6 · Jan 9, 3:52 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"greediron" said:
@"purplefaithful" said: Very reminiscent of USB inside. 

Whichever stadium proposal makes the family the most $ will win. 

Soldier Field with a roof? Dayum, that just doesn't sound right.


Will they still find a way to have a shitty field?


Why the hell wouldn't they? It's worked so well for them!

#7 · Jan 9, 6:23 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

No mention of the fact that they are still land locked with horrible parking/tailgating area and are within city limits of ridiculous hotel/food/taxes. A destination area with more reasonably priced accommodations and restaurants with parking in the burbs with less headaches and crime makes another reinvention of Soldier Field a lot less inviting.  

#8 · Jan 9, 8:41 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

I thought Arlington Heights was pretty much a done deal.  Did I miss something?

#9 · Jan 9, 8:48 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"mgobluevikes" said: No mention of the fact that they are still land locked with horrible parking/tailgating area and are within city limits of ridiculous hotel/food/taxes. A destination area with more reasonably priced accommodations and restaurants with parking in the burbs with less headaches and crime makes another reinvention of Soldier Field a lot less inviting.  
Sounds like many of the the same arguments made against the  metrodome site 10+ years ago, but we know how that ended.
#10 · Jan 10, 5:25 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"1VikesFan" said: I thought Arlington Heights was pretty much a done deal.  Did I miss something?
They are getting close to closing on the land,  but as of now it's still a wide open game and I'm sure all that really matters is what makes the team the most money,  fans are sheep,  they will go along with whatever they get.
#11 · Jan 10, 5:27 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"JimmyinSD" said:
@"mgobluevikes" said: No mention of the fact that they are still land locked with horrible parking/tailgating area and are within city limits of ridiculous hotel/food/taxes. A destination area with more reasonably priced accommodations and restaurants with parking in the burbs with less headaches and crime makes another reinvention of Soldier Field a lot less inviting.  
Sounds like many of the the same arguments made against the  metrodome site 10+ years ago, but we know how that ended.
I think a lot of longtime Bears fans have had it with the city. Frankly, they've had it with their ownership. Think of the political climate change in the last 10 yrs. Chicago isn't in a good spot all the way around. 
#12 · Jan 10, 8:15 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"mgobluevikes" said:
@"JimmyinSD" said:
@"mgobluevikes" said: No mention of the fact that they are still land locked with horrible parking/tailgating area and are within city limits of ridiculous hotel/food/taxes. A destination area with more reasonably priced accommodations and restaurants with parking in the burbs with less headaches and crime makes another reinvention of Soldier Field a lot less inviting.  
Sounds like many of the the same arguments made against the  metrodome site 10+ years ago, but we know how that ended.
I think a lot of longtime Bears fans have had it with the city. Frankly, they've had it with their ownership. Think of the political climate change in the last 10 yrs. Chicago isn't in a good spot all the way around. 
a lot of our fans were done with downtown,  but when push came to shove they all decided a new stadium was more important than the rest of the wants ( ie: parking, tailgating, etc )  I suspect that since the ownership in this case doesnt have LA to hold over the cities head,  the fans know they arent in danger of possibly losing their franchise so would be less willing to settle than our fan base was,  but none the less,  if they ended up with that thing where soldier is now,  they will be there.
#13 · Jan 10, 8:31 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

Fans dont have a say unfortunately...

#14 · Jan 10, 8:36 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

I lived in Chicago for a while and the more you try to figure out how deals get done, the more you realize that you don't really want to watch the sausage being made.

I'm sure that wherever they end up, the McCaskeys will find themselves smothered in finger lickin' good public stadium cash gravy.  

#15 · Jan 11, 11:02 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"comet52" said: I lived in Chicago for a while and the more you try to figure out how deals get done, the more you realize that you don't really want to watch the sausage being made.


#16 · Jan 12, 6:34 AM
Log in to reply.

Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)

Warn Poster

Suspend User (3 days)

The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.

Forum The Longship Chicago tells Bears.... not so fast!

Welcome to VikeFans!

Welcome back, Skol fans! This is our new home. Log in with your username or email and your existing password.


Be sure to check out the How To's and Questions forum for guides on getting around the new site, and use the Help Request forum if you run into anything that you need help with. Skol!