Forum The Longship Bears Going "All In" for the Draft

Bears Going "All In" for the Draft

HA
Joined May 2013
0 posts
Rep: 0

https://www.si.com/fannation/bringmethesports/vikings/bears-to-hold-out-justin-fields-in-season-finale-against-vikingsIt'll be Nathan Peterman, not Justin Fields, under center for the
Chicago Bears in Sunday's regular season finale against the Minnesota
Vikings. 
Field sustained a hip injury in this past Sunday's game
against the Lions. Head coach Matt Eberflus confirmed Wednesday that
Fields didn't suffer a long-term injury but Peterman will start at
Soldier Field against Minnesota. 

The
three-win Bears appear be destined to go out with another loss, which
would guarantee them no worse than the No. 2 pick in the upcoming NFL
draft. If the Bears lose and the Texans beat the Colts, the Bears will
have the No. 1 pick. 
If the Bears beat the Vikings, they could wind up tied with the Cardinals and Broncos for the second worst record in the NFL.

#1 · Jan 4, 11:36 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

I mean there is no reason to risk Fields at this point. He already had a visit to the medical tent, he doesn't need another one 

#2 · Jan 4, 12:03 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

If I were Nathan, I'd fly his family in for this one. Could be his best game as a pro. 

#3 · Jan 4, 12:14 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

So a stat line like Peterman - 406 yards, 3 TD, 0 Int. 

#4 · Jan 4, 12:22 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

Watching that game I remember thinking the Lions were putting some damn hard hits on him and wondering when Eberflus was going to pull him.  Unreal they let him keep playing.

#5 · Jan 4, 12:31 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"HappyViking" said:
https://www.si.com/fannation/bringmethesports/vikings/bears-to-hold-out-justin-fields-in-season-finale-against-vikingsIt'll be Nathan Peterman, not Justin Fields, under center for the Chicago Bears in Sunday's regular season finale against the Minnesota Vikings. 



I think I'd rather watch this Peterman...

#6 · Jan 4, 4:10 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"purplefaithful" said:
@"HappyViking" said:
https://www.si.com/fannation/bringmethesports/vikings/bears-to-hold-out-justin-fields-in-season-finale-against-vikingsIt'll be Nathan Peterman, not Justin Fields, under center for the Chicago Bears in Sunday's regular season finale against the Minnesota Vikings. 



I think I'd rather watch this Peterman...



thats where my mind went as well

#7 · Jan 4, 4:44 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

Nathan Peterman


Stats
Game
CMP%
YDS
TD
INT
Rating
Dec 24
vs
60.0
25
0
1
33.3
Dec 18
vs
0.0
0
0
0
39.6
Regular Season
50.0
25
0
1
21.5
Career (2017-2022)
52.5
598
3
13
32.2

Even our D couldn’t make this guy look good, could they…?! :o
 

#8 · Jan 5, 6:16 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"Kentis" said: Nathan Peterman
Stats
Game
CMP%
YDS
TD
INT
Rating
Dec 24
vs
60.0
25
0
1
33.3
Dec 18
vs
0.0
0
0
0
39.6
Regular Season
50.0
25
0
1
21.5
Career (2017-2022)
52.5
598
3
13
32.2
Even our D couldn’t make this guy look good, could they…?! :o
 

You can't underestimate what the D is capable of, hope they don't exceed my expectations. 

Last year I was wondering what it would have been like to win all those one score games.  I guess this year I am finding out.

#9 · Jan 6, 6:04 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"BigAl99" said:
@"Kentis" said: Nathan Peterman
Stats
Game
CMP%
YDS
TD
INT
Rating
Dec 24
vs
60.0
25
0
1
33.3
Dec 18
vs
0.0
0
0
0
39.6
Regular Season
50.0
25
0
1
21.5
Career (2017-2022)
52.5
598
3
13
32.2
Even our D couldn’t make this guy look good, could they…?! :o
 

You can't underestimate what the D is capable of, hope they don't exceed my expectations. 

Last year I was wondering what it would have been like to win all those one score games.  I guess this year I am finding out.



I think last year's team was better. If we had somehow snuck into the playoffs, I would've had more confidence in that team winning a game or two than I do in this year's team. 

#10 · Jan 6, 6:11 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"BigAl99" said:
@"Kentis" said: Nathan Peterman
Stats
Game
CMP%
YDS
TD
INT
Rating
Dec 24
vs
60.0
25
0
1
33.3
Dec 18
vs
0.0
0
0
0
39.6
Regular Season
50.0
25
0
1
21.5
Career (2017-2022)
52.5
598
3
13
32.2
Even our D couldn’t make this guy look good, could they…?! :o
 

You can't underestimate what the D is capable of, hope they don't exceed my expectations. 

Last year I was wondering what it would have been like to win all those one score games.  I guess this year I am finding out.



I think last year's team was better. If we had somehow snuck into the playoffs, I would've had more confidence in that team winning a game or two than I do in this year's team. 



And it'll feel worse in this game against Chicago. I hate to be such a downer, but this D is f#$%ing horrible. The O-line is missing parts. I expect Chicago to release the hounds and make Cousins's life miserable. 

#11 · Jan 6, 6:41 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"StickyBun" said:
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"BigAl99" said:
@"Kentis" said: Nathan Peterman
Stats
Game
CMP%
YDS
TD
INT
Rating
Dec 24
vs
60.0
25
0
1
33.3
Dec 18
vs
0.0
0
0
0
39.6
Regular Season
50.0
25
0
1
21.5
Career (2017-2022)
52.5
598
3
13
32.2
Even our D couldn’t make this guy look good, could they…?! :o
 

You can't underestimate what the D is capable of, hope they don't exceed my expectations. 

Last year I was wondering what it would have been like to win all those one score games.  I guess this year I am finding out.



I think last year's team was better. If we had somehow snuck into the playoffs, I would've had more confidence in that team winning a game or two than I do in this year's team. 



And it'll feel worse in this game against Chicago. I hate to be such a downer, but this D is f#$%ing horrible. The O-line is missing parts. I expect Chicago to release the hounds and make Cousins's life miserable. 


I'm not too worried about Chicago. We're probably better off with the 3 seed anyway.

But the prevailing thought in the preseason--that this team needed some time to get the new offense and new defense clicking--never materialized, especially on defense. 

Also, I've always believed that the team who wins the Super Bowl isn't necessarily the best team, but it is almost always the team who enters the playoffs hot and healthy. The Vikings are neither hot nor healthy. 

Could it happen in the playoffs? You bet. See 1987. We can win the 1st game, but getting past teams like the 49ers or Cowboys seems so unlikely right now. 

#12 · Jan 6, 7:06 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"StickyBun" said:
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"BigAl99" said:
@"Kentis" said: Nathan Peterman
Stats
Game
CMP%
YDS
TD
INT
Rating
Dec 24
vs
60.0
25
0
1
33.3
Dec 18
vs
0.0
0
0
0
39.6
Regular Season
50.0
25
0
1
21.5
Career (2017-2022)
52.5
598
3
13
32.2
Even our D couldn’t make this guy look good, could they…?! :o
 

You can't underestimate what the D is capable of, hope they don't exceed my expectations. 

Last year I was wondering what it would have been like to win all those one score games.  I guess this year I am finding out.



I think last year's team was better. If we had somehow snuck into the playoffs, I would've had more confidence in that team winning a game or two than I do in this year's team. 



And it'll feel worse in this game against Chicago. I hate to be such a downer, but this D is f#$%ing horrible. The O-line is missing parts. I expect Chicago to release the hounds and make Cousins's life miserable. 


I'm not too worried about Chicago. We're probably better off with the 3 seed anyway.

But the prevailing thought in the preseason--that this team needed some time to get the new offense and new defense clicking--never materialized, especially on defense. 

Also, I've always believed that the team who wins the Super Bowl isn't necessarily the best team, but it is almost always the team who enters the playoffs hot and healthy. The Vikings are neither hot nor healthy. 

Could it happen in the playoffs? You bet. See 1987. We can win the 1st game, but getting past teams like the 49ers or Cowboys seems so unlikely right now. 



Don't disagree. But my point is its going to FEEL worse for VikingNation with a loss in Chicago. Which I really think is going to happen. 

#13 · Jan 6, 7:10 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"StickyBun" said:
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"StickyBun" said:
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"BigAl99" said:
@"Kentis" said: Nathan Peterman
Stats
Game
CMP%
YDS
TD
INT
Rating
Dec 24
vs
60.0
25
0
1
33.3
Dec 18
vs
0.0
0
0
0
39.6
Regular Season
50.0
25
0
1
21.5
Career (2017-2022)
52.5
598
3
13
32.2
Even our D couldn’t make this guy look good, could they…?! :o
 

You can't underestimate what the D is capable of, hope they don't exceed my expectations. 

Last year I was wondering what it would have been like to win all those one score games.  I guess this year I am finding out.



I think last year's team was better. If we had somehow snuck into the playoffs, I would've had more confidence in that team winning a game or two than I do in this year's team. 



And it'll feel worse in this game against Chicago. I hate to be such a downer, but this D is f#$%ing horrible. The O-line is missing parts. I expect Chicago to release the hounds and make Cousins's life miserable. 


I'm not too worried about Chicago. We're probably better off with the 3 seed anyway.

But the prevailing thought in the preseason--that this team needed some time to get the new offense and new defense clicking--never materialized, especially on defense. 

Also, I've always believed that the team who wins the Super Bowl isn't necessarily the best team, but it is almost always the team who enters the playoffs hot and healthy. The Vikings are neither hot nor healthy. 

Could it happen in the playoffs? You bet. See 1987. We can win the 1st game, but getting past teams like the 49ers or Cowboys seems so unlikely right now. 



Don't disagree. But my point is its going to FEEL worse for VikingNation with a loss in Chicago. Which I really think is going to happen. 


Nathan Peterman is worse than Malik Willis and Zach Wilson.  If they lose the NFL should step in and disqualify them from the playoffs. 

#14 · Jan 6, 7:44 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

Losing O'Neil really took the steam out of my engine...

And has already been pointed out, what we fans were hoping for as improvement over time? Just hasn't materialized to the degree we would have liked by now. On both sides of the ball. 

The losses being as fugly as they have been? Just casts a spotlight on how the play calling and personnel need to improve next year.

We'll see how far they can go this post-season. Frankly, I think GB is the team on a roll in December and the Bucs are lurking out in the shadows.

I will be happy when Brady and Rogers are faded memories.  

#15 · Jan 6, 7:48 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

Vikings fans need to invest in this, especially this year.

#16 · Jan 6, 7:53 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"StickyBun" said:
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"StickyBun" said:
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"BigAl99" said:
@"Kentis" said: Nathan Peterman
Stats
Game
CMP%
YDS
TD
INT
Rating
Dec 24
vs
60.0
25
0
1
33.3
Dec 18
vs
0.0
0
0
0
39.6
Regular Season
50.0
25
0
1
21.5
Career (2017-2022)
52.5
598
3
13
32.2
Even our D couldn’t make this guy look good, could they…?! :o
 

You can't underestimate what the D is capable of, hope they don't exceed my expectations. 

Last year I was wondering what it would have been like to win all those one score games.  I guess this year I am finding out.



I think last year's team was better. If we had somehow snuck into the playoffs, I would've had more confidence in that team winning a game or two than I do in this year's team. 



And it'll feel worse in this game against Chicago. I hate to be such a downer, but this D is f#$%ing horrible. The O-line is missing parts. I expect Chicago to release the hounds and make Cousins's life miserable. 


I'm not too worried about Chicago. We're probably better off with the 3 seed anyway.

But the prevailing thought in the preseason--that this team needed some time to get the new offense and new defense clicking--never materialized, especially on defense. 

Also, I've always believed that the team who wins the Super Bowl isn't necessarily the best team, but it is almost always the team who enters the playoffs hot and healthy. The Vikings are neither hot nor healthy. 

Could it happen in the playoffs? You bet. See 1987. We can win the 1st game, but getting past teams like the 49ers or Cowboys seems so unlikely right now. 



Don't disagree. But my point is its going to FEEL worse for VikingNation with a loss in Chicago. Which I really think is going to happen. 

Of course the Vikes will easily beat this Bears team, Sticky... in OT.

#17 · Jan 6, 8:02 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"Kentis" said: Nathan Peterman
Stats
Game
CMP%
YDS
TD
INT
Rating
Dec 24
vs
60.0
25
0
1
33.3
Dec 18
vs
0.0
0
0
0
39.6
Regular Season
50.0
25
0
1
21.5
Career (2017-2022)
52.5
598
3
13
32.2
Even our D couldn’t make this guy look good, could they…?! :o
 
Please, please, don't dare them or they will work to prove you wrong...  LOL
#18 · Jan 6, 10:42 AM
Log in to reply.

Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)

Warn Poster

Suspend User (3 days)

The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.

Forum The Longship Bears Going "All In" for the Draft

Welcome to VikeFans!

Welcome back, Skol fans! This is our new home. Log in with your username or email and your existing password.


Be sure to check out the How To's and Questions forum for guides on getting around the new site, and use the Help Request forum if you run into anything that you need help with. Skol!