Bears Going "All In" for the Draft
https://www.si.com/fannation/bringmethesports/vikings/bears-to-hold-out-justin-fields-in-season-finale-against-vikingsIt'll be Nathan Peterman, not Justin Fields, under center for the
Chicago Bears in Sunday's regular season finale against the Minnesota
Vikings.
Field sustained a hip injury in this past Sunday's game
against the Lions. Head coach Matt Eberflus confirmed Wednesday that
Fields didn't suffer a long-term injury but Peterman will start at
Soldier Field against Minnesota.
three-win Bears appear be destined to go out with another loss, which
would guarantee them no worse than the No. 2 pick in the upcoming NFL
draft. If the Bears lose and the Texans beat the Colts, the Bears will
have the No. 1 pick.
If the Bears beat the Vikings, they could wind up tied with the Cardinals and Broncos for the second worst record in the NFL.
I mean there is no reason to risk Fields at this point. He already had a visit to the medical tent, he doesn't need another one
If I were Nathan, I'd fly his family in for this one. Could be his best game as a pro.
So a stat line like Peterman - 406 yards, 3 TD, 0 Int.
Watching that game I remember thinking the Lions were putting some damn hard hits on him and wondering when Eberflus was going to pull him. Unreal they let him keep playing.
@"HappyViking" said:https://www.si.com/fannation/bringmethesports/vikings/bears-to-hold-out-justin-fields-in-season-finale-against-vikingsIt'll be Nathan Peterman, not Justin Fields, under center for the Chicago Bears in Sunday's regular season finale against the Minnesota Vikings.
I think I'd rather watch this Peterman...

@"purplefaithful" said:@"HappyViking" said:https://www.si.com/fannation/bringmethesports/vikings/bears-to-hold-out-justin-fields-in-season-finale-against-vikingsIt'll be Nathan Peterman, not Justin Fields, under center for the Chicago Bears in Sunday's regular season finale against the Minnesota Vikings.
I think I'd rather watch this Peterman...
thats where my mind went as well
@"Kentis" said: Nathan Peterman
You can't underestimate what the D is capable of, hope they don't exceed my expectations.
Last year I was wondering what it would have been like to win all those one score games. I guess this year I am finding out.
@"BigAl99" said:You can't underestimate what the D is capable of, hope they don't exceed my expectations.
Last year I was wondering what it would have been like to win all those one score games. I guess this year I am finding out.
I think last year's team was better. If we had somehow snuck into the playoffs, I would've had more confidence in that team winning a game or two than I do in this year's team.
@"MaroonBells" said:@"BigAl99" said:You can't underestimate what the D is capable of, hope they don't exceed my expectations.
Last year I was wondering what it would have been like to win all those one score games. I guess this year I am finding out.
I think last year's team was better. If we had somehow snuck into the playoffs, I would've had more confidence in that team winning a game or two than I do in this year's team.
And it'll feel worse in this game against Chicago. I hate to be such a downer, but this D is f#$%ing horrible. The O-line is missing parts. I expect Chicago to release the hounds and make Cousins's life miserable.
@"StickyBun" said:@"MaroonBells" said:@"BigAl99" said:You can't underestimate what the D is capable of, hope they don't exceed my expectations.
Last year I was wondering what it would have been like to win all those one score games. I guess this year I am finding out.
I think last year's team was better. If we had somehow snuck into the playoffs, I would've had more confidence in that team winning a game or two than I do in this year's team.
And it'll feel worse in this game against Chicago. I hate to be such a downer, but this D is f#$%ing horrible. The O-line is missing parts. I expect Chicago to release the hounds and make Cousins's life miserable.
I'm not too worried about Chicago. We're probably better off with the 3 seed anyway.
But the prevailing thought in the preseason--that this team needed some time to get the new offense and new defense clicking--never materialized, especially on defense.
Also, I've always believed that the team who wins the Super Bowl isn't necessarily the best team, but it is almost always the team who enters the playoffs hot and healthy. The Vikings are neither hot nor healthy.
Could it happen in the playoffs? You bet. See 1987. We can win the 1st game, but getting past teams like the 49ers or Cowboys seems so unlikely right now.
@"MaroonBells" said:@"StickyBun" said:@"MaroonBells" said:@"BigAl99" said:You can't underestimate what the D is capable of, hope they don't exceed my expectations.
Last year I was wondering what it would have been like to win all those one score games. I guess this year I am finding out.
I think last year's team was better. If we had somehow snuck into the playoffs, I would've had more confidence in that team winning a game or two than I do in this year's team.
And it'll feel worse in this game against Chicago. I hate to be such a downer, but this D is f#$%ing horrible. The O-line is missing parts. I expect Chicago to release the hounds and make Cousins's life miserable.
I'm not too worried about Chicago. We're probably better off with the 3 seed anyway.But the prevailing thought in the preseason--that this team needed some time to get the new offense and new defense clicking--never materialized, especially on defense.
Also, I've always believed that the team who wins the Super Bowl isn't necessarily the best team, but it is almost always the team who enters the playoffs hot and healthy. The Vikings are neither hot nor healthy.
Could it happen in the playoffs? You bet. See 1987. We can win the 1st game, but getting past teams like the 49ers or Cowboys seems so unlikely right now.
Don't disagree. But my point is its going to FEEL worse for VikingNation with a loss in Chicago. Which I really think is going to happen.
@"StickyBun" said:@"MaroonBells" said:@"StickyBun" said:@"MaroonBells" said:@"BigAl99" said:You can't underestimate what the D is capable of, hope they don't exceed my expectations.
Last year I was wondering what it would have been like to win all those one score games. I guess this year I am finding out.
I think last year's team was better. If we had somehow snuck into the playoffs, I would've had more confidence in that team winning a game or two than I do in this year's team.
And it'll feel worse in this game against Chicago. I hate to be such a downer, but this D is f#$%ing horrible. The O-line is missing parts. I expect Chicago to release the hounds and make Cousins's life miserable.
I'm not too worried about Chicago. We're probably better off with the 3 seed anyway.But the prevailing thought in the preseason--that this team needed some time to get the new offense and new defense clicking--never materialized, especially on defense.
Also, I've always believed that the team who wins the Super Bowl isn't necessarily the best team, but it is almost always the team who enters the playoffs hot and healthy. The Vikings are neither hot nor healthy.
Could it happen in the playoffs? You bet. See 1987. We can win the 1st game, but getting past teams like the 49ers or Cowboys seems so unlikely right now.
Don't disagree. But my point is its going to FEEL worse for VikingNation with a loss in Chicago. Which I really think is going to happen.
Nathan Peterman is worse than Malik Willis and Zach Wilson. If they lose the NFL should step in and disqualify them from the playoffs.
Losing O'Neil really took the steam out of my engine...
And has already been pointed out, what we fans were hoping for as improvement over time? Just hasn't materialized to the degree we would have liked by now. On both sides of the ball.
The losses being as fugly as they have been? Just casts a spotlight on how the play calling and personnel need to improve next year.
We'll see how far they can go this post-season. Frankly, I think GB is the team on a roll in December and the Bucs are lurking out in the shadows.
I will be happy when Brady and Rogers are faded memories.
Vikings fans need to invest in this, especially this year.

@"StickyBun" said:@"MaroonBells" said:@"StickyBun" said:@"MaroonBells" said:@"BigAl99" said:You can't underestimate what the D is capable of, hope they don't exceed my expectations.
Last year I was wondering what it would have been like to win all those one score games. I guess this year I am finding out.
I think last year's team was better. If we had somehow snuck into the playoffs, I would've had more confidence in that team winning a game or two than I do in this year's team.
And it'll feel worse in this game against Chicago. I hate to be such a downer, but this D is f#$%ing horrible. The O-line is missing parts. I expect Chicago to release the hounds and make Cousins's life miserable.
I'm not too worried about Chicago. We're probably better off with the 3 seed anyway.But the prevailing thought in the preseason--that this team needed some time to get the new offense and new defense clicking--never materialized, especially on defense.
Also, I've always believed that the team who wins the Super Bowl isn't necessarily the best team, but it is almost always the team who enters the playoffs hot and healthy. The Vikings are neither hot nor healthy.
Could it happen in the playoffs? You bet. See 1987. We can win the 1st game, but getting past teams like the 49ers or Cowboys seems so unlikely right now.
Don't disagree. But my point is its going to FEEL worse for VikingNation with a loss in Chicago. Which I really think is going to happen.
Of course the Vikes will easily beat this Bears team, Sticky... in OT.
Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)
Warn Poster
Suspend User (3 days)
The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.