Forum The Longship A case for the worst Superbowl contender ever

A case for the worst Superbowl contender ever

ST
Joined May 2013
0 posts
Rep: 1

Quite the headline, huh? lol. Story below:

https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2022/dec/27/minnesota-vikings-worst-super-bowl-contender-ever

#1 · Dec 28, 5:08 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

That is the best article I've read in a long time.  Its well worth the time. "It’s never happened before.” IMHO is the MANTRA for this team.  Enjoy the read and enjoy the ride.  I particularly like the part about "gut and superstition " 

#2 · Dec 28, 5:39 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

A lot of the "experts" are focusing on stats such as point differential and others that the Vikes rate low in, but isn't 11-0 in one score games also a stat and one that an argument can be made is one of the most important ones as it is a measure of resiliency and ability to play in the clutch which are two of the most important elements to winning post season games.  At some point, the Vikes are likely to be in a close playoff game, at that point, which team will the "experts" want to put their money on to win the game, the team that was 11-0 in those games all season or the team with the high point differential?

#3 · Dec 28, 8:30 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"JR44" said: A lot of the "experts" are focusing on stats such as point differential and others that the Vikes rate low in, but isn't 11-0 in one score games also a stat and one that an argument can be made is one of the most important ones as it is a measure of resiliency and ability to play in the clutch which are two of the most important elements to winning post season games.  At some point, the Vikes are likely to be in a close playoff game, at that point, which team will the "experts" want to put their money on to win the game, the team that was 11-0 in those games all season or the team with the high point differential?
Right?  Our point differential isn't typical of most 12-3 teams because our defense isn't that good.  Better than last year in terms of getting some key stops at critical moments and getting more turnovers...  But the fact remains we give up a lot of yards and points.

If you take out the Dallas blow out, we look a lot better in point differential.  Also, if you look at our average margin of victory, it's almost 6 pts per win (5.83).

As the season has progressed, I think this is what we are.  A team with a good offense that can make some big plays at key times, a below average defense that has some swagger in big moments, and good special teams. I don't know if that's a recipe to win a Super Bowl this year, but we'll certainly find out.

#4 · Dec 29, 8:45 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"Wetlander" said:
@"JR44" said: A lot of the "experts" are focusing on stats such as point differential and others that the Vikes rate low in, but isn't 11-0 in one score games also a stat and one that an argument can be made is one of the most important ones as it is a measure of resiliency and ability to play in the clutch which are two of the most important elements to winning post season games.  At some point, the Vikes are likely to be in a close playoff game, at that point, which team will the "experts" want to put their money on to win the game, the team that was 11-0 in those games all season or the team with the high point differential?
Right?  Our point differential isn't typical of most 12-3 teams because our defense isn't that good.  Better than last year in terms of getting some key stops at critical moments and getting more turnovers...  But the fact remains we give up a lot of yards and points.

If you take out the Dallas blow out, we look a lot better in point differential.  Also, if you look at our average margin of victory, it's almost 6 pts per win (5.83).

As the season has progressed, I think this is what we are.  A team with a good offense that can make some big plays at key times, a below average defense that has some swagger in big moments, and good special teams. I don't know if that's a recipe to win a Super Bowl this year, but we'll certainly find out.



Totally agrees with you Wetlander.  We're setting a lot better now than a year ago and do have the possibilities/opportunities to go a lot further.

#5 · Dec 29, 9:06 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

I think you can't talk about this year accurately without fully appreciating what happened last year. Last year's Vikings ranked very highly in DVOA, despite the fact that they finished with a losing record. 

Last year, 8 of their 9 losses were one-possession games. A year later, same team, same core of players, same basic level of talent. Both teams probably 10 to 11 win rosters. But we're winning those games this year, likely because of better coaching, better culture and more emphasis on situational football. 

So, how are we going to do in the playoffs? Honestly, not well if we can't stop the mid-game offensive ruts and the wide open underneath routes on defense. Not well at all. 

My reason for hope is three-fold: 1. Getting Bradbury back alongside a much improved Ed Ingram. Cousins has been good all year, but he's on another level with protection. 2. Then getting Evans back to go with Shelley, Dantzler and P2. 3. Donatell has shown a very slight willingness to be more aggressive lately. If that continues to ratchet up, the Vikings might have a chance. 

#6 · Dec 29, 9:39 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"MaroonBells" said: I think you can't talk about this year accurately without fully appreciating what happened last year. Last year's Vikings ranked very highly in DVOA, despite the fact that they finished with a losing record. 

Last year, 8 of their 9 losses were one-possession games. A year later, same team, same core of players, same basic level of talent. Both teams probably 10 to 11 win rosters. But we're winning those games this year, likely because of better coaching, better culture and more emphasis on situational football. 

So, how are we going to do in the playoffs? Honestly, not well if we can't stop the mid-game offensive ruts and the wide open underneath routes on defense. Not well at all. 

My reason for hope is three-fold: 1. Getting Bradbury back alongside a much improved Ed Ingram. Cousins has been good all year, but he's on another level with protection. 2. Then getting Evans back to go with Shelley, Dantzler and P2. 3. Donatell has shown a very slight willingness to be more aggressive lately. If that continues to ratchet up, the Vikings might have a chance. 


 I think those two thoughts go together.  When Dantzler was healthy and starting to catch on, our D wasn't actually terrible.  If we have Evans, Shelley and Dantzler to go with P2, we have a chance.

#7 · Dec 29, 9:42 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

Every team in each conference has a playoff ride that ends except for one team. Does that make every losing playoff team a shit team with blatant weaknesses? Nope. The playoffs are a moment in time. If there's any team in the NFL that plays better in the moment, or when they need a play or a stop have it come through consistently with no more room for error its Minnesota. Win a home playoff game to start and then play YOLO ball on the road and good things might happen. 

#8 · Dec 29, 9:50 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"StickyBun" said: Every team in each conference has a playoff ride that ends except for one team. Does that make every losing playoff team a shit team with blatant weaknesses? Nope. The playoffs are a moment in time. If there's any team in the NFL that plays better in the moment, or when they need a play or a stop have it come through consistently with no more room for error its Minnesota. Win a home playoff game to start and then play YOLO ball on the road and good things might happen. 
i generally agree. but even your positivity is a litrle pessimistic. only 1 home game for No2 seed if you win round 1? or are we expecting to lose our spot?
#9 · Dec 29, 10:09 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"Vikeking2" said:
@"StickyBun" said: Every team in each conference has a playoff ride that ends except for one team. Does that make every losing playoff team a shit team with blatant weaknesses? Nope. The playoffs are a moment in time. If there's any team in the NFL that plays better in the moment, or when they need a play or a stop have it come through consistently with no more room for error its Minnesota. Win a home playoff game to start and then play YOLO ball on the road and good things might happen. 
i generally agree. but even your positivity is a litrle pessimistic. only 1 home game for No2 seed if you win round 1? or are we expecting to lose our spot?
I expect to lose the #2 seed, yes. Good catch. This D is really bad. I wouldn't be surprised to see KOC rest some starters in the last game against Chicago.
#10 · Dec 29, 10:19 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

Every team in this league is good - all professionals who are the best at what they do.

Any team can beat another “any given Sunday” home / away, favored or underdog.

Unless you have deep talent / The health of your starting players is damn important.

There is an element of luck / despite skill / in a few plays in every game which can determine an outcome. a fumble, a blocked punt, missed kick, etc.

Referees will often “keep teams in games” and too often dictate its outcome. I anticipate a lot less flags in the playoffs, they usually let guys go at each other.

Team chemistry and confidence help foster a “positive culture”

All that said, it has been a sweet ride, as Vikings fans we are ALWAYS expecting disappointment. I say, screw the “margin of victory” stats and naysayers. All we have ever wanted for our decades of heartbreak is “one year” to put it all together....

...Why not this one?

SKOL 

#11 · Dec 29, 1:18 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

I still keep thinking of the Cincinnati Bengals from last year.

#12 · Dec 29, 11:57 PM
Log in to reply.

Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)

Warn Poster

Suspend User (3 days)

The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.

Forum The Longship A case for the worst Superbowl contender ever

Welcome to VikeFans!

Welcome back, Skol fans! This is our new home. Log in with your username or email and your existing password.


Be sure to check out the How To's and Questions forum for guides on getting around the new site, and use the Help Request forum if you run into anything that you need help with. Skol!