Forum The Longship O'Neill Fair Contract Extension?

O'Neill Fair Contract Extension?

Cricket
Cricket
Mod May 2026 Trivia Champion
Joined May 2013
419 posts
Rep: 256

https://www.si.com/nfl/vikings/onsi/what-might-fair-contract-extension-for-brian-oneill-look-like

What Might a Fair Contract Extension For Brian O'Neill Look Like?

O'Neill's case is tricky because for as consistent as he's been, he's getting a bit older and has dealt with a few injuries in recent years.

Brian O'Neill wants a new contract. The Vikings want to keep him around. But finding fair value for both sides could be somewhat tricky, given O'Neill's age and recent injury history.

A new report from ESPN's Kevin Seifert has confirmed what we suspected, which is that O'Neill's lack of participation in Vikings OTAs — he was present but not in uniform for both practices open to the media over the last couple weeks — is related to his desire for a contract extension. The Vikings' standout right tackle is headed into the final year of the five-year, $92.5 million deal he signed with Minnesota back in 2021, two different general managers ago.

Per Seifert, O'Neill will be in uniform and participating at least to some extent in this week's mandatory minicamp, which begins on Tuesday at TCO Performance Center. Unlike OTAs, skipping minicamp comes with fines. O'Neill will presumably be doing enough to avoid those fines but still limiting his workload to some degree in an effort to minimize injury risk.

"Brian O'Neill turns 31 in September," Seifert wrote in a follow-up tweet. "Everyone in the building wants him to remain with the Vikings, but a contract befitting his stature is complicated and is really a decision that needs to be made by a permanent general manager. Over to you, Nolan Teasley."

O'Neill has been the Vikings' starting right tackle almost since the moment he was drafted in the second round out of Pitt in 2018. This offseason's retirements of C.J. Ham and Harrison Smith (though the latter's isn't official) have made O'Neill the Vikings' longest-tenured player, as he heads into his ninth NFL season.

Virtually everything about O'Neill's Vikings career has been positive. He's made two Pro Bowls and been a model of consistency at the right tackle position. He isn't immune to bad reps or subpar games, but the complete picture of his season always ends up looking very good, whether you're watching the tape or glancing at his PFF grades. O'Neill is a locker room leader who is basically a lock to be voted as a captain for the sixth straight year this fall. He's one of the best second-round picks in Vikings history, joined on that Mt. Rushmore by Matt Blair, Sammy White, and either Eric Kendricks or Dalvin Cook.

Yet even with that context established, it's not quite as simple for Teasley, Rob Brzezinski, and the Vikings as giving O'Neill whatever he asks for on a new contract. He'll be 31 in September. He's a great offensive lineman but not a truly elite one. And although he's played 124 of a possible 133 games in his career, he has suffered a notable lower-body injury in three of the last four years (Achilles tear in Week 16 of 2022, ankle sprain in Week 14 of 2023, MCL sprain in Week 4 last year).

The Vikings drafted Northwestern tackle Caleb Tiernan in the third round this year, giving them a potential fallback plan if they can't agree to terms with O'Neill. Still, Tiernan is entirely unproven and will be an outlier if he overcomes his arm length and plays tackle at a high level in the NFL. The Vikings, with a win-now roster, should absolutely be looking to keep O'Neill around. There's no reason why he can't continue to hold down the right tackle spot and deliver borderline Pro Bowl play for several more years.

The question is what kind of deal makes sense for both the Vikings and O'Neill, in terms of length and average value. Anything above $26 million per year would be top-five tackle money, which is probably a touch too rich. But O'Neill is due a raise from his previous $18.5 million AAV and will likely become one of the league's highest-paid right tackles. Could $24-25 million per year over three or four years be the sweet spot? Let's say three years and $72 million, with a good chunk of guaranteed money and some extra incentives if he plays all 17 games and/or earns Pro Bowl or All-Pro honors. That feels rather fair for both sides.

It'll be interesting to see what happens, especially considering the Vikings may have big contracts coming for Murray and Jordan Addison next offseason, if all goes right. Does Teasley wait until training camp to get a look at Tiernan before deciding? Will O'Neill and his camp draw a hard line or acquiesce a bit to make sure he has long-term security before this season begins?

Getting a deal done makes sense for both the Vikings and O'Neill, but there are several factors that each side will have to consider in negotiations.

LIVE WELL ~ LOVE MUCH ~ LAUGH OFTEN

Liked:
#1 · Jun 9, 11:20 AM
purplefaithful
Joined May 2013
8,111 posts
Rep: 4,678

It will be interesting to see how Teasley manages this...And Cashman and AVG.

I sure as hell dont want to start a rookie at RT. On top of that, we can only hope LT is as taken care of as we hope too.

my $ is on an O'Neil extension that lets the org out of the contract fairly easily after a season. I think AVG gets one more extension too.

Your guess is as good as mine re: Cashman. I do know there is a noticeable drop-off when he aint playing.

edited Jun 9, 2026 11:28 AM CT

Hurry-up Vikings, we ain't getting any younger! 

Liked:
#2 · Jun 9, 11:27 AM CT
purplefaithful
Joined May 2013
8,111 posts
Rep: 4,678

1. Lane Johnson (Philadelphia Eagles)

  • Age: 35 / 36

  • Contract Details: In March 2025, Johnson and the Eagles agreed to a one-year contract extension worth $25 million. Combined with his existing deal, his total compensation was brought to $65 million, with $40 million fully guaranteed at signing.

  • Annual Average Salary: $25,000,000 APY

  • Contract Duration: Signed through the 2027 season

2. Rob Havenstein (Los Angeles Rams)

  • Age: 30 (at signing)

  • Contract Details: Just before entering his 30s, Havenstein signed a three-year contract extension with the Rams. The deal was worth $34.5 million, featuring $24.1 million in guaranteed money.

  • Annual Average Salary: $11,500,000 APY

  • Contract Duration: Kept him in Los Angeles through the 2025 season

Outside of top-tier, proven veterans like Johnson, the market for right tackles over 30 primarily shifts to shorter "bridge" contracts or year-to-year team options. Players in their late 20s and early 30s with large Right Tackle contracts include 27-year-old Tristan Wirfs (Tampa Bay Buccaneers, $28.1M APY) and Taylor Moton (Carolina Panthers, $22M APY).

Source: Gemini

edited Jun 9, 2026 11:44 AM CT

Hurry-up Vikings, we ain't getting any younger! 

Liked:
#3 · Jun 9, 11:43 AM CT
StickierBuns
Joined May 2013
8,853 posts
Rep: 645

Like I mentioned in another thread, you have to be very careful extending players past 30 years old. Diminishing returns is a real thing at that age in the NFL for certain positions especially. Teasley doesn't want to overextend himself and have issues like Minnesota just got themselves out of.

Liked:
#4 · Jun 9, 11:56 AM CT
NorseFeathers
Joined Apr 2019
230 posts
Rep: 322

O'Neill's absence from mandatory minicamp would yield roughly $108K in fines. Per Seifert, O’Neill is expected to attend this week’s minicamp and participate in at least a limited capacity.

Liked:
#5 · Jun 9, 12:02 PM CT
purplefaithful
Joined May 2013
8,111 posts
Rep: 4,678

StickierBuns wrote:

Like I mentioned in another thread, you have to be very careful extending players past 30 years old. Diminishing returns is a real thing at that age in the NFL for certain positions especially. Teasley doesn't want to overextend himself and have issues like Minnesota just got themselves out of.
https://x.com/vikingzfanpage/status/2064387950775767232

Yah, I hear you re: the after 30 extensions.

After losing JG, keeping AVG for at least another 1-2 would be my #1 priority among the 3.

Hurry-up Vikings, we ain't getting any younger! 

Liked:
#6 · Jun 9, 12:24 PM CT
StickierBuns
Joined May 2013
8,853 posts
Rep: 645

purplefaithful wrote:

Yah, I hear you re: the after 30 extensions.
After losing JG, keeping AVG for at least another 1-2 would be my #1 priority among the 3.

Its all about the length and the 'real' year/s of the contract. Say a 3 year deal but 2 of the years are real....you can get out of the 3rd year easily if necessary. AVG has had his share of injuries.

Liked:
#7 · Jun 9, 12:37 PM CT
comet52
Joined Sep 2013
825 posts
Rep: 1,170

NorseFeathers wrote:

O'Neill's absence from mandatory minicamp would yield roughly $108K in fines. Per Seifert, O’Neill is expected to attend this week’s minicamp and participate in at least a limited capacity.

Walking from the locker room to the field and standing there is probably the extent of his participation.

Liked:
#8 · Jun 9, 12:53 PM CT
pattersaur
Joined Jul 2017
821 posts
Rep: 755

comet52 wrote:

Walking from the locker room to the field and standing there is probably the extent of his participation.

At least he's not milking a summer long ear infection a la Hockenson. My guess is the team and O'Neill come to an extension. He's been a good Viking.

Liked:
#9 · Jun 9, 1:10 PM CT
Log in to reply.

Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)

Warn Poster

Suspend User (3 days)

The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.

Forum The Longship O'Neill Fair Contract Extension?
Return to top ↑

Welcome to VikeFans!

Welcome back, Skol fans! This is our new home. Log in with your username or email and your existing password.


Be sure to check out the How To's and Questions forum for guides on getting around the new site, and use the Help Request forum if you run into anything that you need help with. Skol!

You belong here, Vikings fan.

Join the VikeFans community to share your takes, react to posts, and talk Vikings with fans who get it.