Forum The Longship NFLDG 2026 Mock Draft

NFLDG 2026 Mock Draft

NF
Joined Jan 2014
70 posts
Rep: 106

If there were a draft anything could happen... this is it! Enjoy the mock leading up to this year's draft. Promise this combines a combination of my own insights paired with some of what I'm hearing:

-- Start it off with a TRADE, the Vikings move back to 1(23) with PHI adding a late 3rd and 4th while giving up a 7th as a sweetener --

1(23) via PHI: Peter Woods DT / Clemson - Although teams are lower on this years DT class, Woods draft stock is being slept on. He can be an immediate one-gap penetrator and disruptor in the run game. Although he needs continued development as a pass-rusher the win rate is strong and the 2024 tape is awesome. The Vikings haven't been directly paired to Woods but they did a lot of work on him over the fall.

-- Another TRADE, the Vikings use their added flexibility in the 3rd to move up for their preferred corner --

1(32) via SEA: Chris Johnson CB / San Diego State - I've heard the Vikings are high on Chris Johnson and I have to say he is a perfect fit for the Vikings defensive system on the outside. He can play on/off coverage and is reliable playing the flat in the run. While he may not have an elite trait, he can do everything well in a versatile defensive system. We'll see if he makes it this far. I would not sleep on Colton Hood being a fit for MN as well.

3(97): Sam Rousch TE/Stanford - Sadiq will be in-play for MN in round one, this feels like a stronger value. Rousch was limited as a pass catcher in Stanford's offense but is a great athlete with a good feel for zone coverage. He'll need time to develop as a route-runner but could see the field early as a high-end run blocker. He could be a Hockenson replacement in 2027.

3(98) via PHI: Kamari Ramsey S/USC - Ramsey is flexible on the back-end having played nickel at USC in 2025 but is likely a deep half safety in the NFL. The Vikings like Jay Ward and will continue leveraging Metellus as a 3rd safety/robber. Ramsey gives them depth and competition for both Theo Jackson and Ward, filling out the back-end of the defense.

4(137) via PHI: Demond Claiborne RB/Wake Forest - I've been on Claiborne for awhile, his explosiveness is very impressive and gives the Vikings RB room a different flavor. He will not develop into a full-time back until he shows better hands in the pass game. But his feel and traits give him high-end upside if he puts it all together.

5(163): Parker Brailsford C/Alabama - We'll see how the Vikings attack center, I'm mainly curious on the style of player they chase. If they are open to a wide-zone athlete, Brailsford make more sense to me than Logan Jones in the 3rd. Brailsford played well against SEC competition and although he lacks the size, is highly physical and gets to the second level in the run game. He's immediate competition to start which is a great 5th round value.

6(196): Mason Reiger EDGE/Wisconsin - His health will be a consideration for teams along with being a bit undersized. But his first step is elite and he fits the profile of hybrid EDGE players Flores has been highly successful with. He would git cleanly into the VanGinkel role as depth.

7(234) CJ Daniels WR/Miami - He's an older player but as a strong track record of getting open with reliable hands. While it may not be the sexiest choice at WR, he can compete for targets as a rookie in a role similar to Jarius Wright.

7(244) Devin Eastern DT/Minnesota - Whether its on the roster or as a UDFA, being able to grab a physically imposing NT would round out the Vikings D-line room for this upcoming season.

Liked:
#1 · Apr 22, 9:33 AM
Cricket
Cricket
Mod
Joined May 2013
257 posts
Rep: 47

Mike Olson wrote:

Love this Guru!

That's some fancy dancing for an interim GM!

:tu_01:

LIVE WELL ~ LOVE MUCH ~ LAUGH OFTEN

Liked:
#22 · Apr 23, 9:45 AM
MaroonBells
Joined Jan 2014
4,338 posts
Rep: 4,518

Nice work, Geoff! Woods makes a lot of sense and I’d be very happy with that pick (assuming we trade down). But at the end of the day, I think Flores might prefer the youth, length, traits and versatility of a Keldric Faulk. If we stay at 18, I think this pick will be Thieneman. But I think we want (if not need) to trade down and start filling in some of the missing drafted depth we lost in the Turner and Hockenson trades. Here, we get an extra 3rd and a 4th and give up a 7th.

1-Keldric Faulk, DL - Production over traits? Fake news. Faulk is not an edge in our defense. He’s a 5t/4i. Versatility and disguisability.

2-Jake Golday, LB - Really REALLY want Rodriguez but I think he goes in the 30s. If Caleb Banks is here….? 

3a-Connor Lew, C - Injury gifts top center to Vikings. With Brandel, he has time

3b-Oscar Delp, TE - Package player early. Starter in 2027 with 10 more lbs.

3c-VJ Payne, S - Day-two safety depth may prompt Vikings to pass on Thieneman in the 1st.

4-Emmett Johnson, RB - Something about this Husker says Vikings

5-Mason Reiger, DE - Even if we don’t trade JG

6-Jeff Caldwell, WR - Holy H/W/S

7a-Alex Harkey, T/G - Saltier Fries

7b-Scooby Williams, LB - Ruh roh, Raggy

“A gentleman is someone who can play the accordion, but doesn't." - Tom Waits

Liked:
#23 · Apr 23, 12:09 PM
StickierBuns
Joined May 2013
8,256 posts
Rep: 95

I don't see much dancing at all from Brez and company today. Solid, steady wins the day. The most exotic thing would be trading Greenard.

Liked:
#24 · Apr 23, 1:56 PM
JustInTime
Joined Feb 2025
2,473 posts
Rep: 1,579

StickierBuns wrote:

I don't see much dancing at all from Brez and company today. Solid, steady wins the day. The most exotic thing would be trading Greenard.

Which supposedly has already happened.

“Hell is empty and all the devils are here”

Shakespeare 

Liked:
#25 · Apr 23, 1:57 PM
StickierBuns
Joined May 2013
8,256 posts
Rep: 95

JustInTime wrote:

Which supposedly has already happened.

I saw that.....would be completely fine with me and I say that really liking Greenard. Let's release the Dallas Turner kraken please....

Liked:
#26 · Apr 23, 2:00 PM
purplefaithful
Joined May 2013
7,642 posts
Rep: 4,210

JustInTime wrote:

Which supposedly has already happened.

Wait....What?

Eagles have pick 54, f that

Pretend for a moment that Lewis is onto something, and Minnesota executes a deal in the Pick No. 49 range. That would implicate these likely trade partners:

  • Kansas City Chiefs (Pick 40)

  • New Orleans Saints (Pick 42)

  • Miami Dolphins (Pick 43)

  • Tampa Bay Buccaneers (Pick 46)

  • Indianapolis Colts (Pick 47)

  • Atlanta Falcons (Pick 48)

  • Carolina Panthers (Pick 51)

  • Philadelphia Eagles (Pick 54)

  • Los Angeles Chargers (Pick 55)


edited Apr 23, 2026 2:08 PM

Hurry-up Vikings, we ain't getting any younger! 

Liked:
#27 · Apr 23, 2:04 PM
StickierBuns
Joined May 2013
8,256 posts
Rep: 95

purplefaithful wrote:

Wait....What?
Eagles have pick 54, f that

Pretend for a moment that Lewis is onto something, and Minnesota executes a deal in the Pick No. 49 range. That would implicate these likely trade partners:
Kansas City Chiefs (Pick 40)
New Orleans Saints (Pick 42)
Miami Dolphins (Pick 43)
Tampa Bay Buccaneers (Pick 46)
Indianapolis Colts (Pick 47)
Atlanta Falcons (Pick 48)
Carolina Panthers (Pick 51)
Philadelphia Eagles (Pick 54)
Los Angeles Chargers (Pick 55)

I've thought for a week now that Philly and Minnesota would agree to get pick #54 from them for Greenard. But that doesn't preclude a new interested team that can offer slightly better having some new interest. Or its all bullshit, lol.

Liked:
#28 · Apr 23, 2:13 PM
MaroonBells
Joined Jan 2014
4,338 posts
Rep: 4,518

JustInTime wrote:

Which supposedly has already happened.

Or a deal has been agreed to provided certain things happen in the draft. I think that's probably more likely.

“A gentleman is someone who can play the accordion, but doesn't." - Tom Waits

Liked:
#29 · Apr 23, 2:26 PM
JustInTime
Joined Feb 2025
2,473 posts
Rep: 1,579

MaroonBells wrote:

Or a deal has been agreed to provided certain things happen in the draft. I think that's probably more likely.

Or, it’s a dart throw. Until I see someone like Jeremiah tweet something like this, color me skeptical.

“Hell is empty and all the devils are here”

Shakespeare 

Liked:
#30 · Apr 23, 2:33 PM
pattersaur
Joined Jul 2017
776 posts
Rep: 720

Would be THRILLED to end the night with 2 first round defenders and have been trying to keep the cornerback drumbeat alive around here for a bit. Thanks for the post NFLDG. Glad you find your way to the new and improved hangout.

Liked:
#31 · Apr 23, 2:38 PM
IceRatz16
Joined Dec 2016
122 posts
Rep: 174

I’m not really sure where the hype for VJ Payne in the third round is coming from. Maybe as a late Day 3 flyer, but a third feels like a stretch and that’s coming from a KSU guy.

He plays aggressive and looks to deliver big hits, but too often that turns into missed tackles and blown opportunities. Offenses take advantage of that. I’m not sold on his instincts, and I don’t see a particularly high ceiling there either.

Liked:
#32 · Apr 23, 2:40 PM
Canthony
Joined Oct 2013
706 posts
Rep: 432

19809e35-2ce8-43fc-9d0a-0844e5e4f80d.png

Liked:
#33 · Apr 23, 2:43 PM
Canthony
Joined Oct 2013
706 posts
Rep: 432

@NFL Draft Guru Hood may go 20 to Dallas. I am just really high on Woods. But your drafts look great!

Liked:
#34 · Apr 23, 2:45 PM
MaroonBells
Joined Jan 2014
4,338 posts
Rep: 4,518

JustInTime wrote:

Or, it’s a dart throw. Until I see someone like Jeremiah tweet something like this, color me skeptical.

Might the Greenard trade be contingent upon the Eagles drafting a DE in the 1st round? And wouldn't it be funny if we took Faulk ahead of them forcing the Eagles to trade for Greenard on day-two? Not quite the same kind of player, but stranger things.

“A gentleman is someone who can play the accordion, but doesn't." - Tom Waits

Liked:
#35 · Apr 23, 2:56 PM
Log in to reply.

Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)

Warn Poster

Suspend User (3 days)

The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.

Forum The Longship NFLDG 2026 Mock Draft
Return to top ↑

Welcome to VikeFans!

Welcome back, Skol fans! This is our new home. Log in with your username or email and your existing password.


Be sure to check out the How To's and Questions forum for guides on getting around the new site, and use the Help Request forum if you run into anything that you need help with. Skol!

You belong here, Vikings fan.

Join the VikeFans community to share your takes, react to posts, and talk Vikings with fans who get it.