Forum The Longship What was your "uh-oh" moment in 2025?

What was your "uh-oh" moment in 2025?

MA
Joined Aug 2017
398 posts
Rep: 452

I'm curious, as a Fan, when did you realize the 2025 Vikings weren't gonna be as good as you'd hoped? 

When did ya get the feeling in your gut that said, "Uh-oh" this isn't gonna work nearly as well as you'd hoped?

The moment you  figured out, JJ wasn't be as good as  advertised ?

FWIW The Vikings played lights out in 2000,Culpepper's first  year as a starter.   it was  a precedent of what was possible. 

With Free Agency spending , the roster,    there were semi realistic high expectations  in 2025.

For me it was in Preseason, when the starters didn't play much.
A rookie QB who'd sat out an entire year ,playing behind a replaced IOL , and a new IDL in Flores system that all  got limited reps....?  

Denny Green got it right when his teams  played full out in preseason and it worked.

The practice of sitting starters in preseason was predicated on a veteran unit returning in tact, where they'd demonstrated they didn't need the reps. That's not what is happening now. These units and players are unproven due to Free Agency yet everyone sits out most of Preseason....

What's the upside to resting starters only for them to show up  week 1 looking off and out of sorts where they  needed more reps..Isn't that the purpose of Preseason?

#1 · Apr 2, 1:22 PM
pattersaur
Joined Jul 2017
722 posts
Rep: 720
Mattyman wrote:
I'm curious, as a Fan, when did you realize the 2025 Vikings weren't gonna be as good as you'd hoped? 

When did ya get the feeling in your gut that said, "Uh-oh" this isn't gonna work nearly as well as you'd hoped?

The moment you  figured out, JJ wasn't be as good as  advertised ?

FWIW The Vikings played lights out in 2000,Culpepper's first  year as a starter.   it was  a precedent of what was possible. 

With Free Agency spending , the roster,    there were semi realistic high expectations  in 2025.

For me it was in Preseason, when the starters didn't play much.
A rookie QB who'd sat out an entire year ,playing behind a replaced IOL , and a new IDL in Flores system that all  got limited reps....?  

Denny Green got it right when his teams  played full out in preseason and it worked.

The practice of sitting starters in preseason was predicated on a veteran unit returning in tact, where they'd demonstrated they didn't need the reps. That's not what is happening now. These units and players are unproven due to Free Agency yet everyone sits out most of Preseason....

What's the upside to resting starters only for them to show up  week 1 looking off and out of sorts where they  needed more reps..Isn't that the purpose of Preseason?

We lost in Green Bay and McCarthy and the offense looked completely pathetic. Then, like a day later when I had almost kind of mentally moved on, we found out McCarthy was injured again. The following days that felt like months listening to fans convince themselves Brosmer was Brady was a dark time :P

#2 · Apr 2, 2:32 PM
AGRforever
Joined Sep 2014
535 posts
Rep: 610

153 yards in the season opener against a not so great Bears secondary. I guess at that point I realized the kid wasn’t the messiah.

#3 · Apr 2, 4:16 PM
Vikesrock
Joined Jan 2014
68 posts
Rep: 179

I expected him to stink for a while in the beginning. He had no live NFL game experience. I never really uh-ohh'd until the Vikings were ruled out of the playoffs. I figured McCarthy would continue as he got more playing time, but he kept getting injured. I believe we did see him improve, but then hurt again..

#4 · Apr 2, 5:10 PM
RS
Joined Apr 2024
181 posts
Rep: 207

When we lost to Atlanta with Cashman and AVG already out and McCarthy getting the high ankle sprain. I knew right there this was going to be one of those MASH unit seasons. Whenever we got one guy back, somebody else went out.

#5 · Apr 2, 6:33 PM
SA
Joined May 2013
100 posts
Rep: 102
pattersaur wrote:

We lost in Green Bay and McCarthy and the offense looked completely pathetic. Then, like a day later when I had almost kind of mentally moved on, we found out McCarthy was injured again. The following days that felt like months listening to fans convince themselves Brosmer was Brady was a dark time :P

Yes.  I think that’s when StickierB wandered out to sea, lol.
Isn’t that when we were wondering if it was a soft benching? Had to eat a lot of shit from Packer fans after that one.

edited Apr 3, 2026 12:56 AM
#6 · Apr 3, 12:54 AM
KN
Joined Jan 2021
198 posts
Rep: 207

I can't point to a specific game, but when I realized that KOC was too stubborn to modify his offense to make it easier for an inexperienced QB & also unwilling to run the ball more, that's when I knew that it was going to be a long season.

#7 · Apr 3, 1:13 AM
IceRatz16
Joined Dec 2016
102 posts
Rep: 158
AGRforever wrote:
153 yards in the season opener against a not so great Bears secondary. I guess at that point I realized the kid wasn’t the messiah.

Then your expectations were unrealistic and have no business being involved with a team developing a QB.

Funny how your stat of his total yardage was the nail in the coffin, but you fail to remember the following:

1) McCarthy won the game, on the road, against an NFC foe (turns out the team that won the division), and in Primetime in his first NFL start
2) McCarthy became the first Vikings quarterback to account for two or more touchdowns in his debut since Tarkenton did in 1961
3) McCarthy was the first player in NFL history to account for three touchdowns in the fourth quarter of his debut
4) McCarthy was the first to throw two touchdown passes of at least 10 yards and rush for a touchdown of at least 10 yards in the fourth quarter

To the original post, I'd say Atlanta's game as well.  It was a debacle for the o line, McCarthy's injury on a "hip-drop" tackle, and KO looked like he was playing the Rams/Lions with Darnold at the helm allowing his QB to get ransacked and the defense looked soft and out of place without a couple key players.

We all need to remember that the NFC North was a very difficult division in '25 again and we lost out of the playoffs because of one play against the second Bears' game.  If we make the playoffs, what happens?  Does McCarthy play and turn into the winner he always has been and win a game under KO?  We won't ever know...

edited Apr 3, 2026 2:18 AM
#8 · Apr 3, 2:15 AM
HO
Joined Apr 2024
411 posts
Rep: 480

When I realized the great, hyped up, offensive line was anything but great. Skule kept me hoping he would miss the plane and I thought JJ didn't have a chance!

#9 · Apr 3, 3:49 AM
Zanary
Joined May 2013
1,047 posts
Rep: 674
RS_Express wrote:
When we lost to Atlanta with Cashman and AVG already out and McCarthy getting the high ankle sprain. I knew right there this was going to be one of those MASH unit seasons. Whenever we got one guy back, somebody else went out.

Similar. JJM went from "clutch" to "cringe" in one week (granted, when he also became a father), and Atlanta was able to run right through our defense practically unchecked.

The whole team looked "off", and the dysfunction was on full display.

KOC, JJM, Flores...make a good plan, or you'll be following Kwesi....

#10 · Apr 3, 3:59 AM
MaroonBells
Joined Jan 2014
3,235 posts
Rep: 4,468
#11 · Apr 3, 4:06 AM
medaille
Joined Mar 2014
670 posts
Rep: 892

The not starting the starters in preseason to get JJM some more game reps was questionable. The Darrisaw not really ready to start but starting was questionable.

But the moment I knew we were in for a long season was after the 2nd game, and JJM had the sprained ankle and the DL got ran over. You just knew things weren’t going to plan at all. You knew we were starting Wentz for like a month and he’d only been in the building for a couple weeks.

#12 · Apr 3, 5:05 AM
comet52
Joined Sep 2013
682 posts
Rep: 1,049

In the spring I took a rare hit on the hopium pipe.  Mmmmm, looks like 11 wins is on the radar!  

But by July and August the high wore off and I was feeling like something was not right.  There were just a bunch of bad signs.  I went back to thinking it was gonna be a .500 team.  

It was objectively worse than that until those last games versus weaklings gave them an easy path to salvaging wins.  Not that they really mattered at that point.

#13 · Apr 3, 5:31 AM
greediron
greediron
Mod
Joined May 2013
681 posts
Rep: 796
Knucklehead wrote:
I can't point to a specific game, but when I realized that KOC was too stubborn to modify his offense to make it easier for an inexperienced QB & also unwilling to run the ball more, that's when I knew that it was going to be a long season.

I think this.  Watching him do the same with Carson Wentz back there just blew my mind.  I was hoping Wentz would go off on him a bit and let him know the O-line was a mash unit, couldn't protect the blind side and without running the ball, the QBs were sitting ducks.

#14 · Apr 6, 6:50 AM
purplefaithful
Joined May 2013
3,478 posts
Rep: 4,142

For me it was the ATL game...

Not because the D decided not to show-up that game, thats going to happen over 17 games.

But because the young QB who needed reps so badly gets a frigging high ankle sprain. The football gods were just not going to make this smooth sailing

Hurry-up Vikings, we ain't getting any younger! 

#15 · Apr 6, 6:58 AM
supafreak84
Joined Jan 2014
1,318 posts
Rep: 1,433
greediron wrote:

I think this.  Watching him do the same with Carson Wentz back there just blew my mind.  I was hoping Wentz would go off on him a bit and let him know the O-line was a mash unit, couldn't protect the blind side and without running the ball, the QBs were sitting ducks.

And this is why I say the curtain was pulled back for me and OConnell was exposed for what he really is. He's never (ever) in his coaching career developed or brought along a young quarterback and he is now the poster boy for "organizations fail young quarterbacks before young quarterbacks fail organizations" after his failure to bring along McCarthy and dumping him after ten games for Murray (not a system fit), who he hopes can run around and make enough plays for him to save his job. So the "uh oh" moment for me was when it was confirmed after four years that the head coach is a fraud. We've had two frauds leading this organization for four years, we got rid of one, now the others been given more control in a must-win year for him.

#16 · Apr 6, 7:06 AM
MaroonBells
Joined Jan 2014
3,235 posts
Rep: 4,468

Something seemed off about KOC from training camp on. He seemed awkward, uncomfortable in a way. With the benefit of hindsight, it may have been that he knew McCarthy wasn't ready and the tension with Kwesi that rose out of that.

#17 · Apr 6, 7:12 AM
JustInTime
Joined Feb 2025
1,974 posts
Rep: 1,513

Realizing that JJ was as fragile as a china doll. That was disappointing after waiting for him to recover from his meniscus surgery. 

But the truly disheartening thing was how poor his fundamentals were. Seems like he’ll need to be rebuilt from the ground up. His parents should demand a refund from the IMG Academy.

“Hell is empty and all the devils are here”

Shakespeare 

#18 · Apr 6, 7:32 AM
MaroonBells
Joined Jan 2014
3,235 posts
Rep: 4,468
JustInTime wrote:
Realizing that JJ was as fragile as a china doll. That was disappointing after waiting for him to recover from his meniscus surgery. 

But the truly disheartening thing was how poor his fundamentals were. Seems like he’ll need to be rebuilt from the ground up. His parents should demand a refund from the IMG Academy.

I don't think I would go to that extreme. A few of the most impressive throws I saw last year by any QB in the NFL were thrown by JJ McCarthy. If you need to tweak his mechanics to develop some consistency and prevent some of those wildly inaccurate easy throws, then go for it. But what he needs most is just time, maturity and a one-way ticket out of his head. I think this year on the bench will do him some good.

#19 · Apr 6, 8:33 AM
Log in to reply.

Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)

Warn Poster

Suspend User (3 days)

The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.

Forum The Longship What was your "uh-oh" moment in 2025?

Welcome to VikeFans!

Welcome back, Skol fans! This is our new home. Log in with your username or email and your existing password.


Be sure to check out the How To's and Questions forum for guides on getting around the new site, and use the Help Request forum if you run into anything that you need help with. Skol!