Forum The Longship 2026 Free Agency and Draft: RB

2026 Free Agency and Draft: RB

MaroonBells
Joined Jan 2014
3,235 posts
Rep: 4,468

I think I'd add Wake Forest's Demond Claiborne to this list linked below. This class doesn't have the depth of last year's class, but right now it seems there are 7 RBs that I'd be pretty happy with: Love, Price, Coleman, Johnson, Washington, Claiborne and Singleton. While I loved Singleton the first time I put him on (he's the best physical specimen in this class) his poor final season does cause some concern. 

Still, unless we bring back Aaron Jones, and I doubt we do, we need a starter on day one, so I think this could be a position where we tap into the free agency market. Breece Hall, Travis Etienne and Kenneth Walker III all free agents, with Etienne the most likely to hit the market IMO. 

https://youtube.com/shorts/SG2o8GS_NJg?si=jv0ga4OyijBISGVh

#1 · Feb 17, 5:27 AM
KN
Joined Jan 2021
198 posts
Rep: 207
MaroonBells wrote:
I think I'd add Wake Forest's Demond Claiborne to this list linked below. This class doesn't have the depth of last year's class, but right now it seems there are 7 RBs that I'd be pretty happy with: Love, Price, Coleman, Johnson, Washington, Claiborne and Singleton. While I loved Singleton the first time I put him on (he's the best physical specimen in this class) his poor final season does cause some concern. 

Still, unless we bring back Aaron Jones, and I doubt we do, we need a starter on day one, so I think this could be a position where we tap into the free agency market. Breece Hall, Travis Etienne and Kenneth Walker III all free agents, with Etienne the most likely to hit the market IMO. 

https://youtube.com/shorts/SG2o8GS_NJg?si=jv0ga4OyijBISGVh

One of the announcers during the SB mentioned that Walker while a very good runner was lacking as a pass receiver & blocker. I doubt that would make him a fit in the KOC offense.

#2 · Feb 17, 5:53 AM
MaroonBells
Joined Jan 2014
3,235 posts
Rep: 4,468
Knucklehead wrote:

One of the announcers during the SB mentioned that Walker while a very good runner was lacking as a pass receiver & blocker. I doubt that would make him a fit in the KOC offense.

I heard that too. Definitely something to consider.

#3 · Feb 17, 6:16 AM
purplefaithful
Joined May 2013
3,492 posts
Rep: 4,156

Per ESPN's Adam Schefter, the Seahawks are unlikely to use their franchise tag on Walker entering an offseason in which they have several key free agents to try retaining as they look to win back-to-back Super Bowl titles.

The estimated franchise tag value for running backs in 2026 is $14.5 million. Seattle does project to have $63.6 million in cap space this offseason.

Hurry-up Vikings, we ain't getting any younger! 

#4 · Feb 17, 9:59 AM
StickierBuns
Joined May 2013
5,336 posts
Rep: 1

I'll be very interested to do a deep dive on the RBs before the Draft.

#5 · Feb 17, 2:50 PM
DA
Joined Feb 2014
63 posts
Rep: 70

My favorite RB in the draft other than Love is Jadarian Price. I expect he goes as high as Rd 2. I like Emmett Johnson too. While not as deep as last year's class, there are several good RBs in this class. For a very late pick, check out Robert Henry Jr from UTSA. I would love to get him in the 6th or 7th.

#6 · Feb 18, 4:08 AM
MaroonBells
Joined Jan 2014
3,235 posts
Rep: 4,468
dadevike wrote:
My favorite RB in the draft other than Love is Jadarian Price. I expect he goes as high as Rd 2. I like Emmett Johnson too. While not as deep as last year's class, there are several good RBs in this class. For a very late pick, check out Robert Henry Jr from UTSA. I would love to get him in the 6th or 7th.

Emmett Johnson is getting a lot of love right now. Bucky Brooks has him RB2. I like him, but right now I wouldn't take him before Price or Coleman. Couple things I don't like about him is that he's not much of a pass protector, plus he'll spend some time dancing and juking looking for the big play instead of just moving the chains.

#7 · Feb 18, 4:37 AM
DA
Joined Feb 2014
63 posts
Rep: 70
MaroonBells wrote:

Emmett Johnson is getting a lot of love right now. Bucky Brooks has him RB2. I like him, but right now I wouldn't take him before Price or Coleman. Couple things I don't like about him is that he's not much of a pass protector, plus he'll spend some time dancing and juking looking for the big play instead of just moving the chains.

True, Johnson is not very good in pass pro. But that is generally the case with high end backs coming out of college. Claiborne is not good at pass pro either. Neither is Price. Love is one of the better backs in pass pro, but I am assuming he will be gone by 18.

#8 · Feb 19, 5:00 AM
MaroonBells
Joined Jan 2014
3,235 posts
Rep: 4,468
dadevike wrote:

True, Johnson is not very good in pass pro. But that is generally the case with high end backs coming out of college. Claiborne is not good at pass pro either. Neither is Price. Love is one of the better backs in pass pro, but I am assuming he will be gone by 18.

Pass pro is a big part of why we should've drafted our back last year. It is a specific talent that some very good backs just don't master as rookies. It's interesting to me that even the back who was supposed to be the best pass blocker from last year's class, Tre Henderson, struggled with it as a rookie. It's why he didn't get a lot of early playing time. 

This is another reason why it might be best for the Vikings to get their RB from free agency. We need a RB1; we don't have time to dink around developing one.

#9 · Feb 23, 3:27 AM
purplefaithful
Joined May 2013
3,492 posts
Rep: 4,156

Wonder if Dallas is out of the LOVE sweepstakes with their recent signing of Javonte Williams?

Hurry-up Vikings, we ain't getting any younger! 

#10 · Feb 23, 3:45 AM
MaroonBells
Joined Jan 2014
3,235 posts
Rep: 4,468
#11 · Feb 24, 2:42 AM
DA
Joined Feb 2014
63 posts
Rep: 70
MaroonBells wrote:
https://x.com/TPPSkol/status/2026005980929052932?s=20

I don't see him as nearly fast, quick, or elusive enough for his very small frame. 180 lbs? UDFA.

#12 · Feb 25, 2:54 AM
StickierBuns
Joined May 2013
5,336 posts
Rep: 1
MaroonBells wrote:

[twitter]https://x.com/TPPSkol/status/2026005980929052932?s=20[/twitter]


Reminds me of a version of Bills RB James Cook, maybe not quite as explosive.
edited Feb 25, 2026 6:43 AM
#13 · Feb 25, 6:41 AM
MaroonBells
Joined Jan 2014
3,235 posts
Rep: 4,468
#14 · Feb 27, 6:27 AM
MaroonBells
Joined Jan 2014
3,235 posts
Rep: 4,468

6-1, 223 and 4.33 speed. 

#15 · Feb 28, 6:35 AM
DA
Joined Feb 2014
63 posts
Rep: 70
MaroonBells wrote:
6-1, 223 and 4.33 speed. 

He is not small but he does not break a ton of tackles. However, give him a crease or have a defender take a less than perfect angle, and he is a threat for a big play at any point. I would not mind Washington if we cannot get Price.

#16 · Feb 28, 11:32 AM
MaroonBells
Joined Jan 2014
3,235 posts
Rep: 4,468
dadevike wrote:

He is not small but he does not break a ton of tackles. However, give him a crease or have a defender take a less than perfect angle, and he is a threat for a big play at any point. I would not mind Washington if we cannot get Price.

Agree. This is not Skattebo. He doesn't run angry and he's not particularly shifty. But that size/speed combo is going to have some teams salivating.

#17 · Mar 1, 1:37 AM
purplefaithful
Joined May 2013
3,492 posts
Rep: 4,156
StickierBuns wrote:
That's what I've been saying, but we'll see....

VikingzFanPage
@vikingzfanpage
·
10m
It’s “probably more likely” that the #Vikings choose to draft a RB compared to signing one in free agency, per
@SeifertESPN
.

“With 9 draft picks, possibly 10 (comp picks), it’s probably more likely the Vikings are looking to draft a RB, who wouldn’t necessarily be the starter on opening day in 2026, but certainly be in position to be a contributor throughout the course of the season.”

I really hope thats not the case...They dont have a #1 RB and that aint helping #9 at all. 

Maybe they can trade for Montgomery ;)

Hurry-up Vikings, we ain't getting any younger! 

#18 · Mar 2, 4:15 AM
MaroonBells
Joined Jan 2014
3,235 posts
Rep: 4,468
StickierBuns wrote:
That's what I've been saying, but we'll see....

VikingzFanPage
@vikingzfanpage
·
10m
It’s “probably more likely” that the #Vikings choose to draft a RB compared to signing one in free agency, per
@SeifertESPN
.

“With 9 draft picks, possibly 10 (comp picks), it’s probably more likely the Vikings are looking to draft a RB, who wouldn’t necessarily be the starter on opening day in 2026, but certainly be in position to be a contributor throughout the course of the season.”

I don't agree with Siefert on this at all. I think the Vikings will more likely add a free agent back than one from the draft. Maybe even one from each, because the Vikings need a starter on day one, and they need numbers. 

Ty Chandler is a free agent. Ham is retired. Jordan Mason is a RB2 and Zavier Scott is an undrafted free agent. No matter who the Vikings add at QB, a big part of their success (or failure) is going to be connected to how well we run the ball. 

Unless we somehow get lucky with Love, the rookie back we bring in will be a day two pick at best. Can you count on that guy? I'm gonna say no. Tre Henderson was a phenomenal prospect—uber successful, big program, loves to pass block, goes early on day two, but doesn't start for the Pats until week 9, because he couldn't be trusted to—wait for it—pass block. 

No, the Vikings should've taken their back last year. Now they need to cover for that in free agency.

#19 · Mar 2, 4:34 AM
purplefaithful
Joined May 2013
3,492 posts
Rep: 4,156
MaroonBells wrote:

I don't agree with Siefert on this at all. I think the Vikings will more likely add a free agent back than one from the draft. Maybe even one from each, because the Vikings need a starter on day one, and they need numbers. 

Ty Chandler is a free agent. Ham is retired. Jordan Mason is a RB2 and Zavier Scott is an undrafted free agent. No matter who the Vikings add at QB, a big part of their success (or failure) is going to be connected to how well we run the ball. 

Unless we somehow get lucky with Love, the rookie back we bring in will be a day two pick at best. Can you count on that guy? I'm gonna say no. Tre Henderson was a phenomenal prospect—uber successful, big program, loves to pass block, goes early on day two, but doesn't start for the Pats until week 9, because he couldn't be trusted to—wait for it—pass block. 

No, the Vikings should've taken their back last year. Now they need to cover for that in free agency.

Hurry-up Vikings, we ain't getting any younger! 

#20 · Mar 2, 5:13 AM
StickierBuns
Joined May 2013
5,336 posts
Rep: 1

That's what I've been saying, but we'll see....

VikingzFanPage
@vikingzfanpage
·
10m
It’s “probably more likely” that the #Vikings choose to draft a RB compared to signing one in free agency, per
@SeifertESPN
.

“With 9 draft picks, possibly 10 (comp picks), it’s probably more likely the Vikings are looking to draft a RB, who wouldn’t necessarily be the starter on opening day in 2026, but certainly be in position to be a contributor throughout the course of the season.”

#21 · Mar 2, 9:41 AM
Log in to reply.

Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)

Warn Poster

Suspend User (3 days)

The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.

Forum The Longship 2026 Free Agency and Draft: RB

Welcome to VikeFans!

Welcome back, Skol fans! This is our new home. Log in with your username or email and your existing password.


Be sure to check out the How To's and Questions forum for guides on getting around the new site, and use the Help Request forum if you run into anything that you need help with. Skol!