Forum The Longship Next QB? Look beyond the names you are hearing?

Next QB? Look beyond the names you are hearing?

Montana Tom
Joined May 2013
688 posts
Rep: 1,243

One veteran player hasn’t come up much in connection to the Vikings, but would fit their QB room perfectly.

The two most popular candidates to share the Vikings’ quarterback room with J.J. McCarthy are Mac Jones and Kirk Cousins. The Vikings might not be able to land either.

Jones is the backup with the San Francisco 49ers and is a favorite target of speculative Vikings fans.

But why would the 49ers, who have championship aspirations, and a starting quarterback who is frequently injured, trade their high-quality backup? And what would it cost if they did?

Cousins recently reworked his massive contract with the Atlanta Falcons so that he could become a free agent this summer. He would be ideal for the Vikings as someone who has succeeded in the Vikings’ system, but would he come back to Minnesota to back up a less-accomplished quarterback, and how much would the Vikings be willing to pay someone who might not see the field?

While Jones and Cousins will become the stars of Speculation Season, I think there are more logical targets out there.

McCarthy should be the Vikings’ starter entering 2026. But the Vikings can’t be assured he will stay healthy or keep the job. So what they need is someone who can win games if needed but not someone who will come to town with the expectation of starting.

This will require some needle-threading.

Let’s look at what they did last year.

They traded for Sam Howell, who failed almost immediately.

They picked up Carson Wentz as a “street” free agent, meaning he was sitting at home.

They tried Max Brosmer, who had played one year of major college football.

My suggestion: How about doing none of the above this offseason?

I think there is a sleeper candidate who is being overlooked.

He has not only played in a Super Bowl, he had a 10-point lead in the fourth quarter before Patrick Mahomes took over the game.

His postseason record is 4-2.

His career completion percentage is 67.4, better than Cousins’ 66.7 or Jones’ 66.5.

He has learned under two of the best offensive coaches in football in Kyle Shanahan and Sean McVay.

Because he plays for McVay, he is familiar with the offense run by Vikings coach Kevin O’Connell.

This player has a far better résumé than Daniel Jones, Cousins or Sam Darnold did before those players arrived in Minnesota.

And because he’s been a backup the past two seasons, he’s healthy and couldn’t make realistic demands about being a starter.

He might also look at the Vikings’ current quarterback situation the way Jones looked at Indianapolis’ last offseason. Jones thought he could beat out young Anthony Richardson, and he was right.

Who am I talking about?

You’ve probably guessed by now: Jimmy Garoppolo.

The name might not excite you. I would encourage you to compare his résumé with every other attainable quarterback on the market.

Now, if Joe Burrow demands a trade from Cincinnati, he would become the subject of a bidding war, and the Vikings would probably at least try to acquire him.

But there is a problem with Burrow: He makes a massive amount of money. To acquire him would cost draft picks, players and funds, which would leave the Vikings in the same situation that Burrow is now trying to extricate himself from — a team that pays its skill-position players so much money that it can’t fund an offensive line or defense.

Garoppolo is on a one-year deal with the Rams. Unless Matthew Stafford retires and the Rams are willing to hand the job to Garoppolo, he will likely be looking for a place where he can make one more run as a starter.

With McCarthy and Garoppolo, the Vikings would have a talented youngster and an accomplished veteran in the room, with Brosmer as their developmental quarterback.

The Vikings could do a lot worse. We know, because they did a lot worse at the backup quarterback position this season.

credit:  Souhan/Strib

#1 · Jan 10, 4:30 AM
StickierBuns
Joined May 2013
5,336 posts
Rep: 1
purplefaithful wrote:

I think it's more than a wink at this point. I think they were pretty transparent in retrospect and after I got to sleeping on it.

I want JJM to be our franchise QB. I want to buy a JJM jersey to hang next to my Page 88. But he hasn't cemented himself as there yet
He hasn't proven himself reliable enough (yet) for an NFL team not to have legit, starting options

If it were my team? Yah, I would bring in competition to better the position depth and save a season if necessary.

Too much at stake and we cant have a repeat of 25 in 2026.


Honestly, I think KOC still really likes JJM....he's got just about everything he's looking for, its in his DNA...but he can't trust him blindly anymore. So he'll bring someone in, they'll compete, and the whole organization will be watching, including ownership. But this is what JJ does, rise to the occasion. I'm very confident he comes out QB1 in any competition, legit or lesser so. He's got that elusive upside.

He's going to be a much better QB in 2026. MUCH. JMO.
edited Jan 14, 2026 9:28 AM
#42 · Jan 14, 9:25 AM
StickierBuns
Joined May 2013
5,336 posts
Rep: 1
pattersaur wrote:


Bringing in Rodgers to be the starter with a tentative plan to go back to JJM the following season is wild to me. Either they believe in McCarthy or they don't. Another year of hemming and hawing with McCarthy tells me that almost no matter what happens, he was a bad pick for us at #10 overall. I'd much rather watch the kid play through it (if he can stay on the field) than see Rodgers and Valdez Scantling and Lazard padding their stats here next year. Do fans seriously want that? Ick


This^

I personally can't think of something dumber than signing Aaron Rodgers for the 2026 season. Why now? You have to give JJM the 2026 season as well for all kinds of reasons, but a 42 year old QB? Doesn't make any sense on any level. Jefferson and McCarthy need to get to work this offseason and they will. They'll bring in some QB for 'competition', but he'll be much younger and will have to ok with eventually being QB2.
#43 · Jan 18, 3:34 AM
comet52
Joined Sep 2013
683 posts
Rep: 1,049
StickierBuns wrote:
They'll bring in some QB for 'competition', 

Yup.  And it won't be tired old Aaron Rodgers, that guy is cooked. Not to mention he wouldn't in a million years be signed to "compete", he'd be the starter effectively ending JJM's purple career. JJM would be traded or released.

Aaron's game is mostly dink and dunk now and he bails on plays at the first hint of getting hit, and that's not what big game explosives hunter KOC wants to do.  He needs a guy to stand in there at the back of the 7 step drop and wait wait wait for the long developing bombs away stuff to come open.  Rodgers would be dead before week 5 trying to do that, carted out on a stretcher never to be seen again.  Before he'd let that happen it would devolve into what it's been for him elsewhere the last few years--coach calls play, Aaron calls different play.  What can coach do about it? Nothing.

Competition is just cover-your-ass for the guys at TCO.  "We need competition."  Right.  Because identifying a starter is just some FAFO exercise in the NFL that no team ever does.  Teams sign a guy or spend draft capital or both and then work like hell to make that guy the man.   JJM this year is a case in point.  If you have to have a bunch of washouts or unknowns battle each other in camp to decide who starts you are starting way behind any other team in the qb department.  It's like saying what's the route we want to take to 6-11 this year?  Taking JJM's 2026 camp reps away from him for a competitor is basically saying game over for JJM in purple.  

Not to mention that KAM/KOC planned this whole thing, ejected Darnold, miscalculated badly on Jones, then Howell, then had to go with bottom of the barrel Wentz at backup, and ran with JJM as #1 this year while getting the Wilfs to spend more than any other team in football to build what they thought would be a contender.  It's kinda early to just say "Oh, Mr. Wilf, that shit didn't work so now we're on to Mac Jones! Or how do you feel about back to the future of Kirk Cousins?  Excited?!"

edited Jan 18, 2026 5:53 AM
#44 · Jan 18, 5:50 AM
Zanary
Joined May 2013
1,047 posts
Rep: 674

Kirk or Mac seem like the obvious choices, at the moment.

KOC, JJM, Flores...make a good plan, or you'll be following Kwesi....

#45 · Jan 18, 10:00 AM
Norse
Joined Mar 2016
47 posts
Rep: 44

Just like the Vikings. We give Kirk 4-5 years the first time and that experiment failed.
So let’s do it over again.

#46 · Jan 19, 3:25 AM
MaroonBells
Joined Jan 2014
3,235 posts
Rep: 4,468
Zanary wrote:
Kirk or Mac seem like the obvious choices, at the moment.

Those are two totally different situations though. A young guy like Mac Jones (or Willis or Murray) probably beats out JJ McCarthy and do we see JJ on the field at any point before his 1st contract expires? Maybe not. Rodgers, Cousins, Mariota, JimmyG....guys like that would just be stop gaps. The future is still JJ with the old guys. 

And I have absolutely no clue which direction the Vikings want to go.

#47 · Jan 19, 3:38 AM
Log in to reply.

Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)

Warn Poster

Suspend User (3 days)

The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.

Forum The Longship Next QB? Look beyond the names you are hearing?

Welcome to VikeFans!

Welcome back, Skol fans! This is our new home. Log in with your username or email and your existing password.


Be sure to check out the How To's and Questions forum for guides on getting around the new site, and use the Help Request forum if you run into anything that you need help with. Skol!