Forum The Longship Potential trade candidates

Potential trade candidates

supafreak84
Joined Jan 2014
1,318 posts
Rep: 1,433

I know we've discussed Addison a bunch, but I think another possibility that's a tradable asset would be Jonathan Greenard. I think it's clear that Van Ginkel is the more important player and Dallas Turner continues to get better and better. Greenard is 28, under a reasonable contract for two more seasons, and has been a pro bowl caliber player. It's always nice to have pass rushers in waves, but it hasn't worked out that way in the two years we've had AVG, Turner and Greenard. I think depending on the trade return, I'd be open to moving Greenard in a trade and moving forward with Dallas Turner in 2026.

#1 · Dec 26, 5:55 AM
FourCornersViking
Joined Jan 2014
213 posts
Rep: 230
supafreak84 wrote:
I know we've discussed Addison a bunch, but I think another possibility that's a tradable asset would be Jonathan Greenard. I think it's clear that Van Ginkel is the more important player and Dallas Turner continues to get better and better. Greenard is 28, under a reasonable contract for two more seasons, and has been a pro bowl caliber player. It's always nice to have pass rushers in waves, but it hasn't worked out that way in the two years we've had AVG, Turner and Greenard. I think depending on the trade return, I'd be open to moving Greenard in a trade and moving forward with Dallas Turner in 2026.

Any trade is possible, depending on what kind of compensation the Vikings will receive.  If it's a big haul, hell why not?

#2 · Dec 26, 6:13 AM
MaroonBells
Joined Jan 2014
3,235 posts
Rep: 4,468

Agree that the Vikings could move on from Greenard this offseason. Not sure if that will be a trade or a release, but it's time to give the job to Turner. I'd add TJ Hockenson to the potential trade list too. 

I think those guys are far more likely to be traded this offseason than Addison. Addison's eligible for an extension after this season, but the Vikings don't HAVE TO do anything for another year. And they could even give him the 5th year option, keeping him in Minnesota through the 2027 season. There are a lot of moving parts with that contract (already paying Jefferson, Addison's character issues, the QB problem) that the Vikings are probably going to want to run the clock out on that one.

#3 · Dec 26, 6:18 AM
Still Hurtn
Joined Aug 2019
200 posts
Rep: 290

Is Kwesi involved? I can predict the outcome with 90% certainty

#4 · Dec 26, 6:20 AM
supafreak84
Joined Jan 2014
1,318 posts
Rep: 1,433
Still Hurtn wrote:
Is Kwesi involved? I can predict the outcome with 90% certainty

Well, and henceforth lies the problem in any potential trade discussion is do your trust the powers in charge to maximize any compensation received in said trade? I think for most of us that answer is a resounding "No" which is a huge problem in itself. It makes any potential trade far less appealing

And I would guess trade compensation would net a similar return for both Addison and Greenard. Probably a 2nd round pick along with a later round pick or player. If you have a GM you trust to maximize those picks, you certainly feel better about it

edited Dec 26, 2025 6:39 AM
#5 · Dec 26, 6:24 AM
Log in to reply.

Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)

Warn Poster

Suspend User (3 days)

The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.

Forum The Longship Potential trade candidates

Welcome to VikeFans!

Welcome back, Skol fans! This is our new home. Log in with your username or email and your existing password.


Be sure to check out the How To's and Questions forum for guides on getting around the new site, and use the Help Request forum if you run into anything that you need help with. Skol!