Forum The Longship Wow Mike...

Wow Mike...

purplefaithful
Joined May 2013
3,478 posts
Rep: 4,142

This place has come along so far in just a week...

Really nice work and I like the new platform a bunch 

Its fast, crisp, more depth to communicate.

Hurry-up Vikings, we ain't getting any younger! 

#1 · Apr 13, 5:54 AM
Mike Olson
Mike Olson
Admin
Joined May 2013
113 posts
Rep: 144

thanks man! I am pretty stoked for this platform too

Is this thing STILL on?

Skol Vikes!

Is this thing on?

#2 · Apr 13, 7:21 AM
Kentis
Joined Oct 2013
541 posts
Rep: 931

Yep, this place is dreamy now…!  :)

edited Apr 13, 2024 7:56 AM
#3 · Apr 13, 7:51 AM
1V
Joined Sep 2013
193 posts
Rep: 185

Agree with y'all, thanks Mike. I really like the platform and all tweeks you've made to make it more friendly for all of us.

#4 · Apr 13, 9:19 AM
Montana Tom
Joined May 2013
686 posts
Rep: 1,239

I agree. Faster, crisper, cleaner.

#5 · Apr 13, 9:27 AM
FLVike
Joined Jul 2017
388 posts
Rep: 357

Very nice job Mike, you are greatly appreciated.

#6 · Apr 13, 10:57 AM
purplefaithful
Joined May 2013
3,478 posts
Rep: 4,142

Just noticed nothing from the Sensitive Topics board trashes the Football board...

Not sure if that was intentional or not? but I like the clean separation

Hurry-up Vikings, we ain't getting any younger! 

#7 · Apr 13, 11:48 AM
JimmyinSD
JimmyinSD
Admin
Joined May 2013
1,754 posts
Rep: 1,867
purplefaithful wrote:
Just noticed nothing from the Sensitive Topics board trashes the Football board...

Not sure if that was intentional or not? but I like the clean separation

It was only an issue before ibecause you allowed it to be.  It was easy not to see those threads if you didn't want to.  The way Mike had that set up was pretty much as close to ideal as you could have if you are going to have multiple forums on one site.  This set up is less than ideal as you have to leave this forum to check for activity on another.

Why isn't Chuck Foreman in the Hall of Fame?

#8 · Apr 13, 12:21 PM
Psyched Vike
Joined Aug 2017
15 posts
Rep: 10
Montana Tom wrote:
I agree.  Faster, crisper, cleaner.

Hahaha - your comment gave me an immediate flashback to the opening theme song of my favorite TV series as a young kid - "The Six Million Dollar Man".  Six Million Dollar Forum?

Great job Mike.  Like the new place a lot.

#9 · Apr 13, 3:44 PM
FLVike
Joined Jul 2017
388 posts
Rep: 357
Psyched Vike wrote:

Hahaha - your comment gave me an immediate flashback to the opening theme song of my favorite TV series as a young kid - "The Six Million Dollar Man".  Six Million Dollar Forum?

Great job Mike.  Like the new place a lot.

"Here comes the throttle, circuit breakers are in. We have separation. Inboards and outboards are on. I'm going forward with the side stick. I've got a blowout in vapor three. Get your pitch to zero. Pitch is out, I can't hold altitude. Flight com, I can't hold it, she's breaking up, she's break......................"

#10 · Apr 14, 3:04 AM
Mike Olson
Mike Olson
Admin
Joined May 2013
113 posts
Rep: 144
JimmyinSD wrote:

It was only an issue before ibecause you allowed it to be.  It was easy not to see those threads if you didn't want to.  The way Mike had that set up was pretty much as close to ideal as you could have if you are going to have multiple forums on one site.  This set up is less than ideal as you have to leave this forum to check for activity on another.

Yeah that software (vanilla forums) had a view of the forums you belonged to called “discussions”. I then coded a way to easily be able to turn off a forum in the discussions view so that if you wanted to remove a forum from the discussions view (like the st forum) to take a break from it you could without losing the ability to go into the forum to view the content. It was a neat feature.

Is this thing STILL on?

Skol Vikes!

Is this thing on?

#11 · Apr 14, 4:01 AM
JimmyinSD
JimmyinSD
Admin
Joined May 2013
1,754 posts
Rep: 1,867
Mike Olson wrote:

Yeah that software (vanilla forums) had a view of the forums you belonged to called “discussions”. I then coded a way to easily be able to turn off a forum in the discussions view so that if you wanted to remove a forum from the discussions view (like the st forum) to take a break from it you could without losing the ability to go into the forum to view the content. It was a neat feature.

Have you found anything similar for this software?  that really was ideal for trying to host 2 types of forums from one site. I was going to ask,  but figured I would wait a while to give you a chance to catch your breath after the last few demanding weeks.

Why isn't Chuck Foreman in the Hall of Fame?

#12 · Apr 14, 5:26 AM
purplefaithful
Joined May 2013
3,478 posts
Rep: 4,142

IMO the issue with the previous software was my belief that most users didnt know how or were just forgetful about the right clicks to avoid sensitive, off-topics on their football view.

Another way to think about it is this; how many casual fans visit sites to call home or post at now and then, and when they see the toxic, vitriol threads on Trump, Biden, Deep state they get turned off and go elsewhere.

So yes, the work arounds are there, but only for those that take the time learn em and use em.

IMHO keep it as is - its nicely separated and both boards easily accessed. Even though I leverage it, I wouldn't even have a sensitive topics board if it were up to me.

edited Apr 14, 2024 5:56 AM

Hurry-up Vikings, we ain't getting any younger! 

#13 · Apr 14, 5:43 AM
LabGeek
Joined Jan 2014
40 posts
Rep: 38

I would agree with purplefaithful, keep it separated.

#14 · Apr 14, 6:05 AM
purplefaithful
Joined May 2013
3,478 posts
Rep: 4,142
LabGeek wrote:
I would agree with purplefaithful, keep it separated.

It was separated b4 too - but it took a little bit of click to get it separate and to keep it separate.

I suspect most didnt learn or upkeep and probably didnt like seeing the political crap. Especially the casual user. 

As it is now? Requires nothing to keep em separate. So its less likely to be off-putting to many. 

I am not falling on a sword over it, just thinking about keeping it friendly and football focused.

Hurry-up Vikings, we ain't getting any younger! 

#15 · Apr 14, 6:22 AM
JimmyinSD
JimmyinSD
Admin
Joined May 2013
1,754 posts
Rep: 1,867
purplefaithful wrote:
IMO the issue with the previous software was my belief that most users didnt know how or were just forgetful about the right clicks to avoid sensitive, off-topics on their football view.

Another way to think about it is this; how many casual fans visit sites to call home or post at now and then, and when they see the toxic, vitriol threads on Trump, Biden, Deep state they get turned off and go elsewhere.

So yes, the work arounds are there, but only for those that take the time learn em and use em.

IMHO keep it as is - its nicely separated and both boards easily accessed. Even though I leverage it, I wouldn't even have a sensitive topics board if it
were up to me.

IIRC The drfault was for new members to not see the ST board, or posts,  so there wasn't the issue of it running people off.  That was the whole point of the ST board and not allowing those types of threads on the main board.   As far as not seeing them it was quite simple,  if you wanted to stay football only,  you hit the Longship, if you wanted to see all forums you hit recent discussions.   

Why isn't Chuck Foreman in the Hall of Fame?

#16 · Apr 14, 9:11 AM
Log in to reply.

Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)

Warn Poster

Suspend User (3 days)

The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.

Forum The Longship Wow Mike...

Welcome to VikeFans!

Welcome back, Skol fans! This is our new home. Log in with your username or email and your existing password.


Be sure to check out the How To's and Questions forum for guides on getting around the new site, and use the Help Request forum if you run into anything that you need help with. Skol!