Forum Statistics
» Members: 858,   » Latest member: Jozed658,   » Forum threads: 21,838,   » Forum posts: 284,409,  
Full Statistics

  Thielen with a good point
Posted by: MaroonBells - 09-15-2025, 10:57 AM - Forum: The Longship - Replies (8)

Will Ragatz @WillRagatz
Adam Thielen: "We started 5-0 one year and missed the playoffs. We started 1-2 and went to the NFC championship game. A Week 2 loss doesn't derail who you are as a football team — but it can, if you don't treat it the right way. Great opportunity to see what this team's really made of."

_________

I'd also like to point out that one year the Patriots lost on opening day to the Bills 31-0. Brady threw 4 picks. They won the Super Bowl that year. The Bills went 6-10 and missed the playoffs. Football is weird.

Print this item

  What I think...
Posted by: Montana Tom - 09-15-2025, 10:01 AM - Forum: The Longship - Replies (5)

What I think after last night's debacle....

Some of this is as obvious as the nose on your face, and some has been stated before...my Monday morning take:

1. We really miss Darrisaw.  Skules is not one, but two steps down.
2. Juergens seemed to be acceptable when Kelly was taken out for concussion protocol.  
3. JJM has to get rid of the ball faster...it takes him a fraction of a second too long to identify receivers.  I am massively disappointed in the performance of our OL in general.
4. I really thought Nailor was going to have "bouncy hands", recovering from a broken bone in his hand.  Instead, it appears that his ability to snag balls has improved since last year.
5. Two of those picks were close to completions...one of two thoughts...JJM has to throw with more anticipation of a DB jumping the route.  Second, good job by the Falcon's DBs.
6.  Why were so many edge rushers not picked up by our OL?
7.  It seems that one cure for stunting the rush would be shorter routes, quicker release.  Not seeing too many good old fashioned slant routes.
8.  Even highly touted Will Fries had a huge false start penalty in front of 70,000 ppl...how must that feel?
9.  I still like Jalen Redmond and LDR on the line together.
10.  Penix looked like the better of the two 2nd year QBs last night, but he wasn't completely better.  JJM threw for more yards, (148-135 yards), Penix had a much higher completion rate (61% to 52%), but the biggest difference was sacks taken (6 vs 3) and picks (2 vs 0).  If you factor in those, Penix looked definitely better.
11.  I knew Bijan Robinson was good, but I could not believe the one-two punch of Robinson-Allgeier. 
12.  Aaron Jones did not seem like the better RB last night, but looking at the box score, he was with a 4.6 YPC.  However, one of the biggest runs by Mason was negated by penalty.  Duh.
13.  I think our DL earned the moniker "sieve" last night.
14.  We get blown out for the home opener against...Atlanta?  We barely beat the Bears...but the Lions blew them out.  This does not bode well.
15.  JJM showed some flashes, no question.  Kid's got an arm...but...plenty of low throws that even Thielen could not catch.
16.  Box score says we had 3 sacks, 3 TFLs and 6 QB hurries...but that did not overcome their running game gashing our DL.  
17.  Myles Price...where did you go?
and finally...
18.  I know that many of us said "patience" with the red-shirt rookie QB.  And then we were teased with that 4th quarter comeback last week thinking "the future is now!"  I've seen one good quarter out of 8 so far.  I think the word of the day is "patience"...the switch does not get flipped in a week...it takes time.  Expect more games like this, not less.

Print this item

  Viking game/NFL observations
Posted by: StickierBuns - 09-15-2025, 06:30 AM - Forum: The Longship - Replies (23)

That was a rough game to watch and take in. Minnesota seems discombobulated out there. Gashed early with the run game, Bijan was eating. They saw something on film and exploited it (for awhile). 218 yards given up on the ground. JJ's inconsistencies/decisions and the O-line not protecting him: 9 of his first 14 pass attempts were either rushed or he was sacked. Injuries to key players keep mounting. Skule is absolutely brutal. Sigh. Lots to work on. Disappointed. The crowd was SO pumped to start the game and they got a shitburger to eat.

  • Uncle Sammy started out rough but finished up nice, good game for him. Not sure where Pittsburgh's D went but lots of guys left wide open. Rodgers looked old, will the media break ankles getting off his bandwagon? Kaleb Johnson.....yikes.
  • How did Jacksonville lose that game? Is enough enough now with Trevor Lawrence? 
  • Detroit opened up a can against Chicago, safe to say they've rebounded and this is a two-horse race for the NFCN title.
  • TreVeyon Henderson looks very pedestrian so far....not horrible but certainly not a playmaker at this current time. Surprising.
  • Danny Dimes? Looking pretty good.
  • I just don't see it again this week with Bryce Young....or Kyler Murray. Same stuff from both of them. 
  • Patrick Mahomes is missing a lot of weapons, most injured/suspended. I think KC will catch fire a bit when his WRers return. But they aren't world-beaters anymore. 
  • God D-mn, Russ....still gas in that tank in New York. 

Print this item

  Post-game vs Falcons
Posted by: supafreak84 - 09-14-2025, 10:46 PM - Forum: The Longship - Replies (16)

Wow, steaming pile of shit all the way around. Have gotten off to terrible starts in both games so far and we just weren't able to recover tonight. A few thoughts;

- Everything about the offense looks off from the plays getting in on time, to the line play, to growing pains with McCarthy. Hockenson has been a complete non factor. We've been in rythem one quarter out of eight and KOC not playing the starters more in the preseason looks like a mistake at this point. KOC is going to have his hands full getting this offense on track and it's likely going to be one of those things they are just going to have to work their way out of. The turd the Bears defense laid against Detroit today makes me a little less impressed with the comeback win last week.

- I thought the defense played well mostly but we gave up a lot of gash runs that kept Atlanta drives alive. We don't have a lot of girth in the front seven and that was a concern to me going in to the season. I thought there were a few times when they ran right at Dallas Turner and he couldn't make the play. Our linebackers are all undersized and it's a girth for speed tradeoff that's not always going to work in our favor like we saw tonight. 

- The good news; we have a Burrow-less Bengals team coming to Minnesota next week and we are close to getting back Harrison Smith, Darrisaw, and Addison. We need to see major improvements on offense and we should against a very mid Bengals defense

Print this item

  DERP! That was a Festival of Pain.
Posted by: Zanary - 09-14-2025, 07:39 PM - Forum: The Longship - Replies (29)

...give up a slew of huge runs, give up 3 early points, go for a 4th deep in our territory and bobble it...

...and Atlanta just got another 1st down.

EDIT! Incomplete pass by Penix.

BARTENDER!!!

Print this item

  Good versus Evil
Posted by: Waterboy - 09-14-2025, 07:11 PM - Forum: Sensitive Topics - Replies (5)

I honestly don’t understand how people can’t distinguish between the two. 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article...oting.html

Print this item

  Burrow down
Posted by: MaroonBells - 09-14-2025, 01:01 PM - Forum: The Longship - Replies (16)

Was just about to post the Bengals OL is trash when Burrow gets sacked. He remains down with some kind of leg injury. Not sure how severe.

Print this item

  Parsons deal offered to Jets
Posted by: purplefaithful - 09-14-2025, 12:48 PM - Forum: The Longship - Replies (1)

Before trading Micah Parsons to the Green Bay Packers, Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones offered the star pass rusher to the New York Jets, he said Saturday in a radio interview.

Jones, a guest on ESPN New York radio, told host Gary Myers that he had called the Jets. Asked by Myers if the Cowboys were interested in star defensive tackle Quinnen Williams, Jones confirmed that Williams was the Jets player he was looking to acquire, along with picks in his proposed trade.

The conversation apparently didn't last long. Jones said the Jets told him they "didn't have the resources to entertain conversations."

Jones wound up dealing Parsons to the Packers for defensive tackle Kenny Clark and two first-round picks. Simultaneously, Parsons signed a four-year, $188 million contract extension.

The Cowboys owner reiterated his stance that he always wanted a "dominant" interior defensive lineman, which explains his interest in Williams.

"A prerequisite to the entire trade was that we had to have right now a really, frankly significant dominant inside defensive player," Jones said. "That was a prerequisite. You didn't get in the mentality of my trading if you didn't have that coming through the door."

Williams, a 2022 first-team All-Pro, is arguably the Jets' top defensive player. He is under contract through 2027.


ESPN

Print this item

  Get ready to sharpen your household budget pencils...
Posted by: purplefaithful - 09-14-2025, 11:59 AM - Forum: Sensitive Topics - Replies (1)

Health insurance costs in the United States are on track for their biggest jump in at least five years, according to multiple surveys, adding turbulence to an uncertain economy and boosting expenses for millions of Americans already beset by inflation.

In 2026, businesses will be hit with an increase of 9 percent or more, and they are expected to push some of the burden onto employees, according to the research.

For the 24 million enrollees of Affordable Care Act insurance plans, however, the news is far worse. The end of enhanced federal subsidies for that program means their costs are expected to rise by more than 75 percent next year, according to KFF, the nonpartisan health policy organization.

Insurers and employers point to two recent factors to explain the rising prices: the tariffs on pharmaceutical imports being considered by the Trump administration and the high cost of new obesity treatments, called GLP-1 drugs.

With inflation top of mind for many Americans, and broad discontent with health care, the spike in prices in both government-sponsored and private health insurance could make the cost of coverage an issue in the 2026 midterm elections. A Gallup poll in December reported that “Americans’ rating of the quality of U.S. healthcare has fallen to the lowest reading in 24 years, and views of healthcare coverage nationally remain broadly negative.”

Now, even among Republicans opposed to the government insurance program, the rapid rise in prices and the end of the Obamacare subsidies have created worry.

“Voters don’t want to see people losing their health insurance,” according to the pollsters of Fabrizio Ward, a Republican polling firm, which found overwhelming bipartisan support for extending the Affordable Care Act subsidies in a recent poll of 28 competitive congressional districts.

Three recent research reports blame the insurance price hikes generally on rising prices and the more liberal use of health care services. All three reports — by Aon, a global consultancy; Mercer, a benefits company; and the Business Group on Health, an industry group — cited the new obesity drugs as a driver of costs.

“We are seeing a continued surge in utilization” of the GLP-1 drugs, said Debbie Ashford, a chief actuary at Aon and an author of the report. 

She said use of the drugs rose 92 percent in 2023 and an additional 56 percent in 2024, and the growth has continued this year at a similar pace. These drugs can cost as much as $800 a month.

As employers seek to limit the bill for GLP-1s, 90 percent of them said they are paying for the drugs only after prior authorization reviews, and nearly half are requiring that patients be substantially overweight as determined by BMI, or body mass index, the Business Group survey said.

Additional cost drivers cited in the forecasts include mental health, chronic conditions and cancer.

The other new force behind the price hikes is the expectation of import tariffs, which would boost drug prices.

Pharmaceuticals are currently exempt from the tariffs imposed by the Trump administration, but the Commerce Department is investigating the impact of drug imports on national security. The president has also said planned tariffs on medicines could be as much as 250 percent.

In a May letter to the Commerce Department, the American Hospital Association warned that the tariffs would significantly affect drug prices. The U.S. gets nearly 30 percent of its active pharmaceutical ingredients from China, the letter said. It also cited a survey indicating that many health care experts expect tariff-related expenses to increase hospital costs by at least 15 percent.

Some insurers, in legal filings with regulators, have said explicitly that the expected tariffs were raising insurance prices.

A document from United Healthcare of New York states that, to account for “uncertainty regarding tariffs and/or the onshoring of manufacturing and their impact on total medical costs, most notably on pharmaceuticals, a total price impact of 3.6% is built into the initially submitted rate filing.”

While the obesity drugs and tariffs are expected to raise health care costs generally, the most urgent political matter is the fate of the extra subsidies for the 24 million people with Affordable Care Act plans, who could see their premium payments double in January if the subsidies go away. About half of adults with such coverage are small-business owners or their employees, or are self-employed, according to KFF.

The extra subsidies were first provided during the coronavirus pandemic, intended to make HealthCare.gov coverage more affordable, and have been in place for the past five years. During that time, the number of enrollees in Obamacare plans has doubled to more than 24 million, helping to reduce the number of Americans without health insurance. The subsidies have come at a significant cost to taxpayers, however, and extending them an additional 10 years would cost $335 billion, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

While some critics have predicted a “death spiral” for the marketplaces if such a trend occurred, others have said the original subsidies are enough to support the program.

“As long as those original subsidies remain in place, there will be no death spiral,” said Cynthia Cox, a researcher at KFF who focuses on the Affordable Care Act. “But some individuals will face hardship.”

Eleven House Republicans, many of them in vulnerable seats, have signed onto a bipartisan bill to extend the subsidies for another year — enough time to move the issue past the 2026 midterm elections.

Rep. Jen Kiggans (R-Virginia), the bill’s lead sponsor, warned that if the tax credit ends, a Virginia family of four earning $64,000 could see their premiums jump by more than $2,500 a year. A 60-year-old couple earning $82,800 could face nearly $12,000 in higher annual premiums.

“This is the last thing Virginians need, and it’s unacceptable,” Kiggans said.

Congress could extend the subsidies in a bill to fund the government after Oct. 1. There has also been talk of extending them in a year-end measure, possibly adding them to budget negotiations, but insurers warn that may be too late: At that point most HealthCare.gov customers will have already selected plans.

House conservatives, who have long railed against the Affordable Care Act, are opposed to continuing the extra federal assistance. House Freedom Caucus Chairman Andy Harris (R-Maryland) said that it’s time “to end COVID-era policies” and predicted that “so many Republicans” would vote against it.

But Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Missouri), known for his populist overtures during the debate over cutting Medicaid, said that “we have to do something” to prevent skyrocketing premiums.

“I think anytime somebody’s health care premiums go up by 200 percent when they’re already unaffordable, that’s a problem. We cannot allow that to happen,” he said.

Source: WAPO

Print this item

  Oh the irony
Posted by: MaroonBells - 09-14-2025, 10:24 AM - Forum: The Longship - Replies (6)

Looked up Ryan Kelly's week one PFF grade for pass blocking in a kind of celebratory good riddance to bad pass blocking at the center position. He graded 78.8, which is very good. Ranked 6th among centers in the NFL. 

You'll never guess who ranked number one.

Print this item


Online Users
There are currently 1152 online users. » 3 Member(s) | 1146 Guest(s)
Applebot, Facebook, Google, ArizonaViking, Godhead, Still Hurtn

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 Melroy van den Berg.