Forum Statistics
» Members: 971,   » Latest member: Dennisnef,   » Forum threads: 22,166,   » Forum posts: 290,766,  
Full Statistics

  Yikes: hero to zero in record time
Posted by: StickierBuns - 04-01-2026, 07:50 AM - Forum: The Longship - Replies (15)

SleeperNFL

@SleeperNFL
·
19h
Adam Schefter on the market for Anthony Richardson:

“If there was a market for him, the Colts would have traded him" 

@PatMcAfeeShow

Print this item

  KOC: 'We wanted to elevate the QB room'
Posted by: StickierBuns - 04-01-2026, 07:15 AM - Forum: The Longship - No Replies



#Vikings HC Kevin O’Connell on what he told JJ McCarthy before signing Kyler Murray:

“I was honest with him. I said ‘We are going to elevate the room as a whole’… We know that there’s a standard to playing that position, that we need, through a competitive environment, get all of our QB’s to play to that standard, and when we do that we’re gonna win football games.”

(NFLOnNBC via YouTube)

Print this item

  League Meeting News
Posted by: purplefaithful - 03-31-2026, 03:47 PM - Forum: The Longship - Replies (2)

PHOENIX -- NFL owners approved two significant changes to the league's replay review system Tuesday, one that is contingent on the NFL using replacement officials this season and one that will take effect whether or not there is an officiating work stoppage.

The NFL and NFL Referees Association broke off collective bargaining last week as a May 31 expiration of their contract looms. The league has already begun collecting names of college officials who could serve as replacements during the preseason and possibly the regular season, if needed.

The first set of Tuesday's approved changes will create a massive expansion of authority for staffers in the league's officiating command center in New York City, allowing them to consult with the on-field referee on a wide variety of called and uncalled penalties and other administrative procedures.

Rich McKay, co-chairman of the NFL's competition committee, said the league would reallocate existing gameday employees to ensure appropriate staffing levels to cover each game if a work stoppage activates these rule changes. NFL owners are "alarmed" about the state of negotiations, sources said over the weekend, and NFL executive vice president Jeff Miller said Tuesday that owners are "insistent upon" a new CBA that provides avenues to improve the state of NFL officiating.

"That's where we are in these negotiations," Miller said, "and that's exactly where we're going to stay."

According to verbiage in the rule, staff members in New York could alert a replacement referee if they see clear and obvious evidence of an uncalled foul for roughing the passer, intentional grounding or an act that would normally lead to disqualification.

Those staff members would also be permitted to alert replacement referees that a flag shouldn't have been thrown if there is clear and obvious video evidence that "at least one element of the foul called is not present," according to the verbiage.

Fouls eligible for this alert include: twisting, pulling, or turning the face mask; roughing the passer; intentional grounding; horse-collar tackles; illegal contact; pass interference; and disqualification.

In 2019, the NFL conducted a one-year experiment that subjected pass interference to replay review. The effort bogged down amid a muddled standard for overturning an on-field decision. In Tuesday's approved rule, the competition committee limited league staff members' involvement only to circumstances where "there was inadvertent tangling of feet when both players were playing the ball or neither player was playing the ball."

In addition, after the two-minute warning or in overtime, the list of called or uncalled penalties that league staff members could provide referees with would expand to include unsportsmanlike conduct based on punching or kicking at an opponent. During kicks, league staff members could also consult on the leverage and leaping rules.

Finally, throughout a game, league staff members could assist on discerning whether a foul should be classified as roughing or running into the kicker.

NFL team employees received a memo over the weekend prohibiting public discussion of the NFLRA negotiations.

Dallas Cowboys owner and CEO and co-chair of the competition committee Stephen Jones declined to talk about the contingency plan Monday, "out of respect for the process and ongoing negotiations." Multiple head coaches also declined to comment on officiating throughout the meetings.

New England Patriots coach and competition committee member Mike Vrabel said in jest, "I think we should just have coaches call fouls."

"I trust the league," San Francisco 49ers owner Jed York told ESPN on Monday. "I don't deal with that piece of the NFL. I'm not on any committees that deal with it, so whatever they're going to do, I trust the league's operations."

Another club owner who requested anonymity told ESPN: "We have to be prepared for everything."

Meanwhile, the second change to replay review will represent a notable shift for owners who have previously sought to limit its scope. For the first time, replay officials in New York will have the authority to both disqualify a player and direct that a penalty be enforced even if on-field officials had not thrown a flag, in the case of either a flagrant football act or non-football act. It takes effect independent of negotiations with the NFLRA.

Previously, owners have not wanted replay officials to throw a flag because they wanted to preserve that for the discretion of on-field officials. 

The original wording of Tuesday's rule change did not allow replay officials to throw a flag. But McKay said it was amended when multiple coaches said there should be an on-field impact if the act is flagrant enough to merit disqualification.

"They said, 'Hey, if we're going to do this, we have to put a flag on, because we cannot have a 4th-and-2 show up, they disqualified a player from the previous play for a non-football act -- he's punched somebody, he's done whatever -- and the team still has to punt,'" McKay said.

McKay said he foresees a continued effort to expand replay review and assist in the near future but said: "We've stayed true to the idea that we want replay assist, and we want New York to be able to help, and we just don't want to move too fast. We don't want to add too much to it."

In other changes, owners approved:

• A rule that eliminates a team's incentive to kick the ball out of bounds on kickoffs from the 50-yard line.

• Allowing teams to declare an onside kick at any point in a game. This change arose because teams wanted to be able to use an onside kick if a penalty enforcement led to them kicking off from the 50.

• A modification of alignment requirements on the kickoff for members of the receiving team in the setup zone, aligning the kickoff rule with the original intent of special teams coaches who developed it in 2024. The NFL thinks it could address an increase in the concussion rate on kickoffs.

• Approved an expansion of its mental health coverage to require each team to employ a full-time clinician or offer full-time coverage. Eight of the 32 teams already are in compliance. It is subject to approval by the NFL Players Association since it's part of the collective bargaining agreement. The policy will also provide more support for players on injured reserve.

• A rule that permit players on Reserve/Physically Unable to Perform list to begin a 21-day practice period after the team's second game of the regular season.

ESPN


18-game regular season? Mixed reaction by NFL owners, coaches

PHOENIX -- The prospect of the NFL migrating to an 18-game regular season might still be years away, but there has been no shortage of conversation about the idea at this week's NFL annual league meeting.

With the recent installation of a new executive director at the NFL Players Association in JC Tretter, and with the continued expansion of the league's international slate of games, momentum appears to be slowly building toward a push for an additional regular-season contest while scaling back to two preseason games.

"If we can make it work, I do think that it would be good," Indianapolis Colts owner and CEO Carlie Irsay-Gordon said Sunday. "Preseason is, as far as the fan product goes, the commissioner has openly said that it's not the best product that we have. It is, I would say, for development of our team. I don't think we can get rid of it.

"But I think as long as the players want it -- which I think they would, because it would mean more revenue -- I think [it's] ultimately a better product. I think it's reasonable. It's something we should work toward."

That is not to say an 18-game regular season would be anything close to a guarantee for the NFL. The NFLPA has already taken a public stance stating its opposition to expanding the regular season. But the union took a similar position before the league moved to the current 17-game season in 2021. That didn't prevent players from approving the new collective bargaining agreement, which included the increase in games but also more revenue for players, in a close vote in 2021.

Any expansion to the league's season would require negotiation with the union. And doing so in the near term would mean reopening CBA talks before the scheduled expiration of the current deal after the 2030 season. It's unclear how likely either side would be to agree to that particular detail.

The potential negotiation would likely require concessions from owners. Irsay-Gordon acknowledged as much when she suggested a shortened offseason program might make for a good incentive for players.

"We need to start thinking about working smarter," she said.

Among the ranks of league owners and executives, however, support for expanding the season to 18 games appears to be growing.

"I like it for the long-term growth and development of the league," New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft said Monday, "to keep our league healthy and grow revenue. I think preseason games have not been what it used to be."

Kraft acknowledged the complexities of such an effort, adding: "Changing to 18 games, and having that real content, and being mindful of player safety, I personally would like to see us have a second bye week."

But some league owners and coaches pumped the brakes on the idea of 18 games. Cleveland Browns owner Jimmy Haslam, for instance, said the conversation is "a little premature." New Orleans Saints coach Kellen Moore added, "If you do preseason and you go all the way to the Super Bowl, it's whatever, 23, 24 games. So, there's a lot of games on the calendar."

But what makes a push for 18 games conceivable despite concerns is that it is likely to be packaged with the league's effort to increase the number of games played internationally, another topic that has taken center stage at this week's meetings at the Arizona Biltmore.

The NFL will play a record nine international games in 2026, adding the first regular-season games in Australia and France. That is a precursor to what the league seems to really want.

"It would allow us to also grow the game internationally," Kraft said. "Every team in the league would play a game overseas. I think it would be a lot more exciting to the fans to have an extra game rather than the way our preseason games stack up."

Having 18 games is seen by many as a vehicle to increasing the number of international contests.

The combination of 18 regular-season games and an expanded international slate could be a boon for NFL revenues. The league could likely charge additional rights fees for the extra games from broadcast partners. And it could continue to build on the key revenue stream international games are providing.

"It's been proven out in terms of the viewership," said Minnesota Vikings owner and president Mark Wilf, whose team embraced international expansion by playing consecutive games in Dublin and London last season. "The engagement has grown dramatically in all the countries we've been in."

The debate is still in its infancy, and many hurdles remain before an expansion of the regular season becomes reality.

But it's clear the conversation among the league's top brass is already underway.

ESPN

Print this item

  About that empty GM seat...
Posted by: purplefaithful - 03-31-2026, 08:52 AM - Forum: The Longship - Replies (13)

PHOENIX – Vikings owner Mark Wilf said the team is currently 100% focused on the upcoming NFL draft and will not commence its general manager hiring process until after its conclusion April 25.

That aligns with Wilf’s initial comments on a search timeline following Kwesi Adofo-Mensah’s firing on Jan. 30, when Wilf named Rob Brzezinski as acting general manager.

Wilf was clear, though, that the process will pick up quickly once that milepost in the league calendar has passed.

“We’re gonna be deliberate about it, but we know we need to get moving for the next college season and all that and get ready,” Wilf told Twin Cities media March 30 at the NFL’s annual league meeting. “Once the draft’s concluded, we’ll get going with interviews, and moving towards a relatively expeditious process to get it going.”

With the draft less than a month away, Wilf said he is in the early stages of planning what the hiring process will look like.

The process will be ownership-driven but not without input from football staff and other key members of the executive staff, such as Chief Operating Officer Andrew Miller.

A third-party representative is expected to help with organization and contacting potential candidates for maximum thoroughness, which Wilf said is something the organization has done before. He clarified the role did not necessarily mean a member of a search firm or a consultant.

The Vikings will continue to have the general manager report directly to ownership, opting not to switch up hierarchy among the staff, but Wilf said the GM is expected to have strong collaboration with coach Kevin O’Connell and the football operations team.

As for other qualities Wilf is looking for in the next Vikings GM, he said that’s part of what this early stage of planning is for establishing.

Wilf declined to say directly whether Brzezinski will be considered as a candidate for the full-time job, stating the conversation is “not yet there.”

Brzezinski has been with the Vikings since before the Wilf family — namely Mark and his brother, Zygi Wilf — took over ownership in 2005, a fact that Wilf noted in his response to whether Brzezinski would be a candidate.

Brzezinski, who also held a session with local media Monday, did not give a direct answer on whether he would like to be considered for the job, either.

“There’s been a couple of times through this process where I’ve kind of sat back and I’ve been like, ‘Wow, this is an awesome responsibility we have right now,’ ” Brzezinski said. He added that his “we” included Senior Manager of Football Administration Emily Badis and football administration consultant Matt Thomas.

“Honestly, just really focused on that,” Brzezinski said. “We wanna get this right. And I believe we’re gonna get it right. Looking into the future at all, it’s not what I’m focused on right now.”

The intense focus on the draft from both parties is understandable. The Vikings have their most picks (nine) since 2022, which was their first season with Adofo-Mensah as GM

Brzezinski, both on Monday and previously, has expressed pride in the team’s patience and deliberate methodology this free agency. The Vikings signed four new players, including quarterback Kyler Murray, as well as re-signed or reworked contracts for a handful of key veterans.

“I think we’re in certainly a much better position than we were just even a few weeks ago, not just from the cap standpoint, but positioned well to draft best available and make us not desperate at any one position to have a strong base to build on,” Wilf said. “Fortunately we have nine picks this year. That’s a good position to be in, and we wanna make sure we hit those.”

Then, the Vikings can take their swing on their next general manager.

Strib

Print this item

  The Athletic: What I heard about Minnesota's QBs
Posted by: StickierBuns - 03-31-2026, 06:54 AM - Forum: The Longship - Replies (26)

https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/7159300...-meetings/

A good read here, check out the full story to get context to a few tidbits I pulled below:

"When O’Connell onboards quarterbacks, he often uses film sessions to inspire faith. It allows O’Connell to appreciate the high-level talent. It also gives him a chance to assess, via their reactions and expressions, what a player likes and doesn’t like. Among all of the aspects of his job as the franchise’s primary figurehead, these moments are his favorite.

Working with Murray, beginning with organized team activities, is likely to be energizing. It’ll spur creativity. The Vikings will toy more than they have in the past with shotgun sets, offset shotgun formations and the pistol. Marrying this passing structure with a complementary run game is a major offseason focus. That is not to say, though, that the Vikings will be shifting drastically away from their under-center bread and butter.

"Kyler is dynamic in the keeper game and movement game with his natural athleticism,” O’Connell said. “I see a lot of ways that we’ll be able to continue the evolution of our offense in Year 5.”

Wilf said he recognized motivation in Murray’s voice when they initially spoke.

“The first thing on his mind was, ‘I want to win championships,’” Wilf said. “That’s what we’re about, too. He’s going to be a great addition.”

p.s. my two cents is that KOC is very intrigued with a motivated Kyler Murray heading up his offense. If we can get any semblance of health this year from the offensive line, the run game will be more effective. BFlo working his usual magic on the other side of the ball and you've got a potentially really solid football team. I think Viking's fans are going to fall hard for Murray's dynamism. I'll have to see it all unfold first, but I don't have any blinders on either. Can't deny my interest isn't piqued. And one last thing, lol: does this sound like a guy (KOC) thinking this is a 'competition'?


[Image: 61i76D2ibnL._AC_UF1000,1000_QL80_.jpg]

Print this item

  KOC presser tidbits from NFL owners meeting
Posted by: StickierBuns - 03-30-2026, 10:45 AM - Forum: The Longship - Replies (8)

Kevin Seifert
@SeifertESPN
·
3m
Kevin O'Connell said that J.J. McCarthy is back in Minnesota after spending the early part of the offseason training in California, and has been in the building most days working out in the weight room.

Print this item

  Greenard staying in Minnesota?
Posted by: StickierBuns - 03-30-2026, 10:39 AM - Forum: The Longship - Replies (21)

VikingzFanPage
@vikingzfanpage
·
6m
Kevin O’Connell says he expects to have Jonathan Greenard on the #Vikings roster in 2026. Greenard has been linked to trade talks as of recent.

“Yeah, I expect him to be part of our team.”

Print this item

  In case you thought officiating couldn't get worse...
Posted by: badgervike - 03-30-2026, 09:25 AM - Forum: The Longship - Replies (3)

NFL to start bringing on replacement refs citing large differences in bargaining...

The real refs struggle...

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/4834...ssociation

Print this item

  OT: Terrifying
Posted by: MaroonBells - 03-30-2026, 08:48 AM - Forum: The Longship - Replies (3)

Print this item

  Random Draft Thoughts
Posted by: supafreak84 - 03-29-2026, 10:36 PM - Forum: The Longship - Replies (32)

Just a few thoughts now that I'm looking at the draft more;

- I still firmly believe (unless we trade down) that the first pick is either a receiver or Peter Woods. When I look at this thing and how it's played out this offseason, there is zero chance Kevin OConnell gets caught with his pants down at receiver when he wants to run a ton of multiple receiver formations and throw the ball all over the yard. We lost Nailor, Felton didn't see the field last year, and the cupboard is literally bare behind him. Nevermind that Addison is one bad offseason decision from missing half the year on suspension. There are a trio of receivers projected in that general area that are worth the pick in Jordyn Tyson (who is tremendous but injury concerns), Omar Cooper (Deebo Samuel type), and Denzel Boston (who has drawn Mike Evans comparisons). We were 28th in passing offense last year and loading the cupboard at receiver in an offense where we run multiple receiver formations and gives whomever we have at quarterback the best chance to be successful just makes sense. 

- I think Peter Woods is the most Flores-type lineman in this draft and to me, defensive line is a massive need. 

- We signed a corner this offseason and to me, with the way Flores operates, that takes corner off the board as a first round need. 

- Safety. Even if Smith doesn't return, I feel pretty good going into next year with Mettelus, Jackson and Jay Ward. I still think the longer it goes without hearing anything definitive on Smith, the higher the likelihood the Hitman is back. Safety would still be a need....but not a likely first round need in my opinion.

I'd be pretty happy with something like;

1. Jordyn Tyson, WR
2. Jacob Rodriguez, LB 
3. LT Overton, DT
3. Jalen Kilgore, S/CB

Print this item


Online Users
There are currently 834 online users. » 0 Member(s) | 832 Guest(s)
Applebot, Google

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 Melroy van den Berg.