Posts: 1,495
Threads: 190
Joined: Jan 2014
Reputation:
1,123
Great game last night with Bama coming back to beat Oklahoma. Miami and A&M in a dogfight this morning. I still think Notre Dame would have beaten any of these four teams if they would have been let in to the playoffs, but that's another conversation. Ole Miss and Oregon should roll later
The following 1 user Likes supafreak84's post:1 user Likes supafreak84's post
Posts: 5,524
Threads: 878
Joined: Apr 2024
Reputation:
4,404
Watching the Miami-Texas AM game now, pretty good so far although very low scoring. Good CFP games and Green Bay at Chicago tonight.
Posts: 1,495
Threads: 190
Joined: Jan 2014
Reputation:
1,123
12-20-2025, 03:38 PM
(This post was last modified: 12-20-2025, 04:04 PM by supafreak84.)
Like I said earlier this year, Malachi Toney is Tyreek Hill 2.0
Also, to jump back on the selection process, if the goal is to get the very best teams in the playoffs, then how can you justify having some conference winner that's not even ranked in the top 20 teams in the playoffs over a team like Notre Dame who could legitimately have won it all? Tulane is en route of getting curb stomped by Ole Miss and James Madison is just a sacrificial lamb that will probably lose by 4 TD's at Oregon tonight. Does anybody really want to see that happen in these games? I know I don't regardless of what happened to Notre Dame. College football needs to once again tweak things and I don't think continuing to add more teams is the right answer. 12 teams is fine, just take the best 12 teams regardless on if you did or did not win some bum ass conference title. Automatic qualifiers needs to come with some kind of caveat, like while you may have won your conference, if you aren't ranked as a top 15 team at seasons end, too bad. Nobody can say with a straight face that Tulane or James Madison are better teams than Notre Dame or BYU
The following 1 user Likes supafreak84's post:1 user Likes supafreak84's post
Posts: 2,246
Threads: 288
Joined: May 2013
Reputation:
1,506
(12-20-2025, 03:38 PM)supafreak84 Wrote: Like I said earlier this year, Malachi Toney is Tyreek Hill 2.0
Also, to jump back on the selection process, if the goal is to get the very best teams in the playoffs, then how can you justify having some conference winner that's not even ranked in the top 20 teams in the playoffs over a team like Notre Dame who could legitimately have won it all? Tulane is en route of getting curb stomped by Ole Miss and James Madison is just a sacrificial lamb that will probably lose by 4 TD's at Oregon tonight. Does anybody really want to see that happen in these games? I know I don't regardless of what happened to Notre Dame. College football needs to once again tweak things and I don't think continuing to add more teams is the right answer. 12 teams is fine, just take the best 12 teams regardless on if you did or did not win some bum ass conference title. Automatic qualifiers needs to come with some kind of caveat, like while you may have won your conference, if you aren't ranked as a top 15 team at seasons end, too bad. Nobody can say with a straight face that Tulane or James Madison are better teams than Notre Dame or BYU
A complex power points system is the only logical answer. I'm not sure how to fairly weigh the power conference teams higher than the good teams from weaker conferences without unfairly disqualifying strong teams from those weaker conferences, but im sure there is a better option than what gave us this years mess.
Why isn't Chuck Foreman in the Hall of Fame?
Posts: 773
Threads: 24
Joined: Aug 2017
Reputation:
694
For March Madness when you have a 64 team field, it makes sense to have automatic bids and create some excitement for some of the smaller schools. For a 12 team field, you can't afford to be giving away spots. Tulane and James Madison cannot compete with these teams, not fair to anyone. They both should have gone to a bowl game they would have had a chance of winning. Imagine it will help them with recruiting, but the two games today were a complete waste.
The following 2 users Like JR44's post:2 users Like JR44's post

Posts: 737
Threads: 4
Joined: Oct 2013
Reputation:
345
(12-20-2025, 03:38 PM)supafreak84 Wrote: Like I said earlier this year, Malachi Toney is Tyreek Hill 2.0
Also, to jump back on the selection process, if the goal is to get the very best teams in the playoffs, then how can you justify having some conference winner that's not even ranked in the top 20 teams in the playoffs over a team like Notre Dame who could legitimately have won it all? Tulane is en route of getting curb stomped by Ole Miss and James Madison is just a sacrificial lamb that will probably lose by 4 TD's at Oregon tonight. Does anybody really want to see that happen in these games? I know I don't regardless of what happened to Notre Dame. College football needs to once again tweak things and I don't think continuing to add more teams is the right answer. 12 teams is fine, just take the best 12 teams regardless on if you did or did not win some bum ass conference title. Automatic qualifiers needs to come with some kind of caveat, like while you may have won your conference, if you aren't ranked as a top 15 team at seasons end, too bad. Nobody can say with a straight face that Tulane or James Madison are better teams than Notre Dame or BYU
Or Texas
The following 1 user Likes Canthony's post:1 user Likes Canthony's post
Posts: 2,246
Threads: 288
Joined: May 2013
Reputation:
1,506
(12-20-2025, 09:33 PM)JR44 Wrote: For March Madness when you have a 64 team field, it makes sense to have automatic bids and create some excitement for some of the smaller schools. For a 12 team field, you can't afford to be giving away spots. Tulane and James Madison cannot compete with these teams, not fair to anyone. They both should have gone to a bowl game they would have had a chance of winning. Imagine it will help them with recruiting, but the two games today were a complete waste.
James Madison hasn't been winning FCS championships, not sure why they suddenly go to the big leagues and deserve a shot at the big trophy over perennial power houses that had respectable records.
Why isn't Chuck Foreman in the Hall of Fame?
Posts: 5,524
Threads: 878
Joined: Apr 2024
Reputation:
4,404
(12-20-2025, 09:33 PM)JR44 Wrote: For March Madness when you have a 64 team field, it makes sense to have automatic bids and create some excitement for some of the smaller schools. For a 12 team field, you can't afford to be giving away spots. Tulane and James Madison cannot compete with these teams, not fair to anyone. They both should have gone to a bowl game they would have had a chance of winning. Imagine it will help them with recruiting, but the two games today were a complete waste.
Agreed. These aren't the best teams in the CFP, that's the bottom line, regardless of what the corporate mouthpieces at the Mothership (ESPN) yammer on about.
Posts: 290
Threads: 45
Joined: Aug 2019
Reputation:
241
Allowing those two high school teams in was new level of stupid.
The following 2 users Like Still Hurtn's post:2 users Like Still Hurtn's post

Posts: 8,208
Threads: 3,973
Joined: May 2013
Reputation:
3,436
Back to the drawing board...
At what point did common sense go out the window when constructing that system?
Cant be allowed to happen next season.
|