(5 hours ago)MaroonBells Wrote: It's a head scratcher for sure, especially considering the quality of the RBs still on the board at that point. I'll give McCardell the benefit of the doubt on this one...for now.
You can give it, that’s nice of you, but the Vikings recent draft picks have in no way earned the benefit of the doubt
Addison has little incentive to sign a deal with us this offseason, unless the Vikings overpay based on What Could Have Been and not, What Was. If they sweeten it enough to keep him around a few more years I won’t complain. He’s excellent.
Nailor and Hockenson I’d try to move on from. Hock makes way more than his production is worth. The problem is there just aren’t many good tight ends, and even fewer who come available. Outside of a rookie phenom, I think
upgrading at TE in ‘26 is unlikely. So can we achieve roughly the same results (not much frankly) for less money? It looks like Hockensons dead cap would be $12M if we cut him if I’m reading it right. Ouch…
Nailor has been solid this year but how much do you pay a guy for 500 yds and a couple TDs? Speedy screams “Signs A Fat Deal With A Bad Team” to me. And that might be a great move for him to go somewhere with more opportunities and money.
If somehow Addison does get traded, for continuity’s sake I guess I’d keep Hockenson around for one more year over anointing Nailor WR2. I’m just not super high on his potential anymore.