Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Wow. Beagles are gonna be pissed
#11
Also can't forget the Eagles lost 7 starters in the offseason, not including Isaiah Rodgers who was a part-time starter. That's a third of their roster.
[-] The following 2 users Like MaroonBells's post:
  
Reply

#12
The eagles looked sloppy, disinterested. Lots of broken tackles, unwillingness to tackle. On Dart's TD run, someone had to have a shot at him. Nobody care enough to try.
Reply

#13
(Yesterday, 12:00 PM)greediron Wrote: The eagles looked sloppy, disinterested.  

This ^. Same with the Chiefs. I think they are a victim of their successes, its hard to keep a team motivated to grind each new season for excellence. And make no mistake, you very much do have to GRIND out wins. Parity is rife in the NFL, so any team is capable really of beating you if you aren't on top of it.
[-] The following 2 users Like StickierBuns's post:
  
Reply

#14
It was a good game. Of course Dart is more fluid than Wentz, he is 10 years younger. Good to see the Eagles discombobulated
Reply

#15
(11 hours ago)Vikergirl Wrote: It was a good game. Of course Dart is more fluid than Wentz, he is 10 years younger. Good to see the Eagles discombobulated

Dart was much more poised and confident than McCarthy has been. I think JJ can get there, but I'm worried about his durability.
I also think Dart will have health issues if he continues to play the way he did last night.
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 Melroy van den Berg.